The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse

Assessing credibility is of importance when deciding the legal outcome of a case. Such an assessment can be especially challenging when the witness is a child with intellectual disabilities. If these children have difficulties making their voices heard in legal proceedings the principal of equal leg...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ann-Christin Cederborg, Clara H. Gumpert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Stockholm University Press 2009-09-01
Series:Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.sjdr.se/articles/367
_version_ 1827837895283572736
author Ann-Christin Cederborg
Clara H. Gumpert
author_facet Ann-Christin Cederborg
Clara H. Gumpert
author_sort Ann-Christin Cederborg
collection DOAJ
description Assessing credibility is of importance when deciding the legal outcome of a case. Such an assessment can be especially challenging when the witness is a child with intellectual disabilities. If these children have difficulties making their voices heard in legal proceedings the principal of equal legal rights may be called in question. We openly interviewed 32 lawyers, prosecutors, and police officers about how they assess credibility of these children. The findings indicate that individual perceptions of credibility are filtered through a legal norm of how to understand reliable reports irrespective of the eyewitnesses' ability to reach that standard. Legal representatives are aware that such a procedure may exclude intellectual disabled children from being fairly assessed but they do not deviate from the rules they perceive as required by their legal role. If knowledge about intellectual competence and functional level of an individual child witness was perceived as necessary when putting an adapted legal norm into praxis, this may increase the chance that assessments of credibility are based on knowledge rather then on a simplified general legal classification. Such an assessment procedure may increase the chance that children with intellectual disabilities are not excluded from fair legal trials of their cases.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T06:55:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2bd2ad648f99408bb18075e6a040fb01
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1501-7419
1745-3011
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T06:55:50Z
publishDate 2009-09-01
publisher Stockholm University Press
record_format Article
series Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
spelling doaj.art-2bd2ad648f99408bb18075e6a040fb012023-09-03T00:03:32ZengStockholm University PressScandinavian Journal of Disability Research1501-74191745-30112009-09-0112212514010.1080/15017410902909134296The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuseAnn-Christin Cederborg0Clara H. Gumpert1Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linkoping University, SwedenSection on Forensic Psychiatry, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SwedenAssessing credibility is of importance when deciding the legal outcome of a case. Such an assessment can be especially challenging when the witness is a child with intellectual disabilities. If these children have difficulties making their voices heard in legal proceedings the principal of equal legal rights may be called in question. We openly interviewed 32 lawyers, prosecutors, and police officers about how they assess credibility of these children. The findings indicate that individual perceptions of credibility are filtered through a legal norm of how to understand reliable reports irrespective of the eyewitnesses' ability to reach that standard. Legal representatives are aware that such a procedure may exclude intellectual disabled children from being fairly assessed but they do not deviate from the rules they perceive as required by their legal role. If knowledge about intellectual competence and functional level of an individual child witness was perceived as necessary when putting an adapted legal norm into praxis, this may increase the chance that assessments of credibility are based on knowledge rather then on a simplified general legal classification. Such an assessment procedure may increase the chance that children with intellectual disabilities are not excluded from fair legal trials of their cases.https://www.sjdr.se/articles/367intellectual disabilitieschild witnessescredibility assessmentsinterdisciplinary knowledge
spellingShingle Ann-Christin Cederborg
Clara H. Gumpert
The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse
Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research
intellectual disabilities
child witnesses
credibility assessments
interdisciplinary knowledge
title The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse
title_full The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse
title_fullStr The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse
title_full_unstemmed The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse
title_short The challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse
title_sort challenge of assessing credibility when children with intellectual disabilities are alleged victims of abuse
topic intellectual disabilities
child witnesses
credibility assessments
interdisciplinary knowledge
url https://www.sjdr.se/articles/367
work_keys_str_mv AT annchristincederborg thechallengeofassessingcredibilitywhenchildrenwithintellectualdisabilitiesareallegedvictimsofabuse
AT clarahgumpert thechallengeofassessingcredibilitywhenchildrenwithintellectualdisabilitiesareallegedvictimsofabuse
AT annchristincederborg challengeofassessingcredibilitywhenchildrenwithintellectualdisabilitiesareallegedvictimsofabuse
AT clarahgumpert challengeofassessingcredibilitywhenchildrenwithintellectualdisabilitiesareallegedvictimsofabuse