The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.

The habitat in which proteins exert their function contains up to 400 g/L of macromolecules, most of which are proteins. The repercussions of this dense environment on protein behavior are often overlooked or addressed using synthetic agents such as poly(ethylene glycol), whose ability to mimic prot...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michela Candotti, Modesto Orozco
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-07-01
Series:PLoS Computational Biology
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4966950?pdf=render
_version_ 1819091037340041216
author Michela Candotti
Modesto Orozco
author_facet Michela Candotti
Modesto Orozco
author_sort Michela Candotti
collection DOAJ
description The habitat in which proteins exert their function contains up to 400 g/L of macromolecules, most of which are proteins. The repercussions of this dense environment on protein behavior are often overlooked or addressed using synthetic agents such as poly(ethylene glycol), whose ability to mimic protein crowders has not been demonstrated. Here we performed a comprehensive atomistic molecular dynamic analysis of the effect of protein crowders on the structure and dynamics of three proteins, namely an intrinsically disordered protein (ACTR), a molten globule conformation (NCBD), and a one-fold structure (IRF-3) protein. We found that crowding does not stabilize the native compact structure, and, in fact, often prevents structural collapse. Poly(ethylene glycol) PEG500 failed to reproduce many aspects of the physiologically-relevant protein crowders, thus indicating its unsuitability to mimic the cell interior. Instead, the impact of protein crowding on the structure and dynamics of a protein depends on its degree of disorder and results from two competing effects: the excluded volume, which favors compact states, and quinary interactions, which favor extended conformers. Such a viscous environment slows down protein flexibility and restricts the conformational landscape, often biasing it towards bioactive conformations but hindering biologically relevant protein-protein contacts. Overall, the protein crowders used here act as unspecific chaperons that modulate the protein conformational space, thus having relevant consequences for disordered proteins.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T22:33:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2beaca0f0a1a4ae2a1742c521d48721d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1553-734X
1553-7358
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T22:33:21Z
publishDate 2016-07-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS Computational Biology
spelling doaj.art-2beaca0f0a1a4ae2a1742c521d48721d2022-12-21T18:48:01ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS Computational Biology1553-734X1553-73582016-07-01127e100504010.1371/journal.pcbi.1005040The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.Michela CandottiModesto OrozcoThe habitat in which proteins exert their function contains up to 400 g/L of macromolecules, most of which are proteins. The repercussions of this dense environment on protein behavior are often overlooked or addressed using synthetic agents such as poly(ethylene glycol), whose ability to mimic protein crowders has not been demonstrated. Here we performed a comprehensive atomistic molecular dynamic analysis of the effect of protein crowders on the structure and dynamics of three proteins, namely an intrinsically disordered protein (ACTR), a molten globule conformation (NCBD), and a one-fold structure (IRF-3) protein. We found that crowding does not stabilize the native compact structure, and, in fact, often prevents structural collapse. Poly(ethylene glycol) PEG500 failed to reproduce many aspects of the physiologically-relevant protein crowders, thus indicating its unsuitability to mimic the cell interior. Instead, the impact of protein crowding on the structure and dynamics of a protein depends on its degree of disorder and results from two competing effects: the excluded volume, which favors compact states, and quinary interactions, which favor extended conformers. Such a viscous environment slows down protein flexibility and restricts the conformational landscape, often biasing it towards bioactive conformations but hindering biologically relevant protein-protein contacts. Overall, the protein crowders used here act as unspecific chaperons that modulate the protein conformational space, thus having relevant consequences for disordered proteins.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4966950?pdf=render
spellingShingle Michela Candotti
Modesto Orozco
The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.
PLoS Computational Biology
title The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.
title_full The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.
title_fullStr The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.
title_full_unstemmed The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.
title_short The Differential Response of Proteins to Macromolecular Crowding.
title_sort differential response of proteins to macromolecular crowding
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4966950?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT michelacandotti thedifferentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding
AT modestoorozco thedifferentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding
AT michelacandotti differentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding
AT modestoorozco differentialresponseofproteinstomacromolecularcrowding