A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States

In failed or failing states, deliberation as it is operationalized in much of the political communication literature is inapplicable. These states lack advanced communication infrastructures, press systems and public spheres, which require high literacy rates, education, the rule of law and other el...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Shawn M. Powers, William Youmans
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: University of Westminster Press 2012-04-01
Series:Journal of Deliberative Democracy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/407/
_version_ 1811309415490387968
author Shawn M. Powers
William Youmans
author_facet Shawn M. Powers
William Youmans
author_sort Shawn M. Powers
collection DOAJ
description In failed or failing states, deliberation as it is operationalized in much of the political communication literature is inapplicable. These states lack advanced communication infrastructures, press systems and public spheres, which require high literacy rates, education, the rule of law and other elements of an enabling regulatory environment. Rather than imagining deliberation as a series of exchanges over focused issues, a scaled down standard of deliberation is appropriate. Such a model could simply involve enhanced communication and information sharing among the citizenry, spreading political norms that aid some level of quasi-governance or simply improving the quality of life in challenging circumstances. Even in both starkly repressive countries and states where governments barely exist, some new communication technologies are increasingly available and they facilitate deliberative exchange. At the same time, foreign international broadcasters are complementing their traditional broadcasting with the development and promotion of deliberation technologies. This paper suggests international broadcasting agencies can find new purpose by utilizing emerging ICTs for the purpose of deliberative development in failed and failing states where public deliberation is under-developed.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T09:41:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2beb97bff2774c979a9300002f4a1d13
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2634-0488
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T09:41:42Z
publishDate 2012-04-01
publisher University of Westminster Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Deliberative Democracy
spelling doaj.art-2beb97bff2774c979a9300002f4a1d132022-12-22T02:51:53ZengUniversity of Westminster PressJournal of Deliberative Democracy2634-04882012-04-018110.16997/jdd.135A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning StatesShawn M. Powers0William Youmans1GSU,University of MichiganIn failed or failing states, deliberation as it is operationalized in much of the political communication literature is inapplicable. These states lack advanced communication infrastructures, press systems and public spheres, which require high literacy rates, education, the rule of law and other elements of an enabling regulatory environment. Rather than imagining deliberation as a series of exchanges over focused issues, a scaled down standard of deliberation is appropriate. Such a model could simply involve enhanced communication and information sharing among the citizenry, spreading political norms that aid some level of quasi-governance or simply improving the quality of life in challenging circumstances. Even in both starkly repressive countries and states where governments barely exist, some new communication technologies are increasingly available and they facilitate deliberative exchange. At the same time, foreign international broadcasters are complementing their traditional broadcasting with the development and promotion of deliberation technologies. This paper suggests international broadcasting agencies can find new purpose by utilizing emerging ICTs for the purpose of deliberative development in failed and failing states where public deliberation is under-developed.https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/407/deliberative developmentfailed stateLiberation TechnologiesVOAAl JazeeraICT
spellingShingle Shawn M. Powers
William Youmans
A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States
Journal of Deliberative Democracy
deliberative development
failed state
Liberation Technologies
VOA
Al Jazeera
ICT
title A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States
title_full A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States
title_fullStr A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States
title_full_unstemmed A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States
title_short A New Purpose for International Broadcasting: Subsidizing Deliberative Technologies in Nontransitioning States
title_sort new purpose for international broadcasting subsidizing deliberative technologies in nontransitioning states
topic deliberative development
failed state
Liberation Technologies
VOA
Al Jazeera
ICT
url https://delibdemjournal.org/article/id/407/
work_keys_str_mv AT shawnmpowers anewpurposeforinternationalbroadcastingsubsidizingdeliberativetechnologiesinnontransitioningstates
AT williamyoumans anewpurposeforinternationalbroadcastingsubsidizingdeliberativetechnologiesinnontransitioningstates
AT shawnmpowers newpurposeforinternationalbroadcastingsubsidizingdeliberativetechnologiesinnontransitioningstates
AT williamyoumans newpurposeforinternationalbroadcastingsubsidizingdeliberativetechnologiesinnontransitioningstates