Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.

<h4>Background</h4>Disposal and washing facilities and services for menstrual materials are often designed based upon technical specifications rather than an in-depth understanding of what drives peoples' choices of practices.<h4>Objectives and data sources</h4>This syst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hannah Jayne Robinson, Dani Jennifer Barrington
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260472
_version_ 1798034302746755072
author Hannah Jayne Robinson
Dani Jennifer Barrington
author_facet Hannah Jayne Robinson
Dani Jennifer Barrington
author_sort Hannah Jayne Robinson
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Background</h4>Disposal and washing facilities and services for menstrual materials are often designed based upon technical specifications rather than an in-depth understanding of what drives peoples' choices of practices.<h4>Objectives and data sources</h4>This systematic review identified and summarised the main behavioural drivers pertaining to the choice of disposal and washing practices of menstrual materials through the thematic content analysis and study appraisal of 82 publications (80 studies) on menstrual health and hygiene published since 1999, reporting the outcomes of primary research across 26 countries.<h4>Results</h4>Disposal and washing behaviours are primarily driven by the physical state of sanitation facilities; however, this is intrinsically linked to taboos surrounding and knowledge of menstruation.<h4>Implications</h4>Using reasons given for disposal and washing practices by menstruators or those who know them well, or inferred by authors of the reviewed studies, we identify the key considerations needed to design facilities and services which best suit the desired behaviours of both planners and those who menstruate.<h4>Inclusivity</h4>The term menstruators is used throughout to encompass all those mentioned in the studies reviewed (girls and women); although no studies explicitly stated including non-binary or transgender participants, this review uses inclusive language that represents the spectrum of genders that may experience menstruation.<h4>Registration</h4>The review protocol is registered on PROSPERO: 42019140029.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T20:42:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2bf9e2088b1544e58d05cbd79939b351
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T20:42:20Z
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2bf9e2088b1544e58d05cbd79939b3512022-12-22T04:04:09ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-011612e026047210.1371/journal.pone.0260472Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.Hannah Jayne RobinsonDani Jennifer Barrington<h4>Background</h4>Disposal and washing facilities and services for menstrual materials are often designed based upon technical specifications rather than an in-depth understanding of what drives peoples' choices of practices.<h4>Objectives and data sources</h4>This systematic review identified and summarised the main behavioural drivers pertaining to the choice of disposal and washing practices of menstrual materials through the thematic content analysis and study appraisal of 82 publications (80 studies) on menstrual health and hygiene published since 1999, reporting the outcomes of primary research across 26 countries.<h4>Results</h4>Disposal and washing behaviours are primarily driven by the physical state of sanitation facilities; however, this is intrinsically linked to taboos surrounding and knowledge of menstruation.<h4>Implications</h4>Using reasons given for disposal and washing practices by menstruators or those who know them well, or inferred by authors of the reviewed studies, we identify the key considerations needed to design facilities and services which best suit the desired behaviours of both planners and those who menstruate.<h4>Inclusivity</h4>The term menstruators is used throughout to encompass all those mentioned in the studies reviewed (girls and women); although no studies explicitly stated including non-binary or transgender participants, this review uses inclusive language that represents the spectrum of genders that may experience menstruation.<h4>Registration</h4>The review protocol is registered on PROSPERO: 42019140029.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260472
spellingShingle Hannah Jayne Robinson
Dani Jennifer Barrington
Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.
PLoS ONE
title Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.
title_full Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.
title_fullStr Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.
title_full_unstemmed Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.
title_short Drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices: A systematic review.
title_sort drivers of menstrual material disposal and washing practices a systematic review
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260472
work_keys_str_mv AT hannahjaynerobinson driversofmenstrualmaterialdisposalandwashingpracticesasystematicreview
AT danijenniferbarrington driversofmenstrualmaterialdisposalandwashingpracticesasystematicreview