What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model

The present paper contains two distinct yet intricately linked studies concerning idiomatic phrases in Greek: a linguistic study and a psycholinguistic study. The linguistic study aims at investigating the degree of fixedness of idiomatic phrases, through a semantic-l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marianna Mini, Kleopatra Diakogiorgi, Aggeliki Fotopoulou
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Presses universitaires de Caen 2011-12-01
Series:Discours
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/discours/8579
_version_ 1818156841433038848
author Marianna Mini
Kleopatra Diakogiorgi
Aggeliki Fotopoulou
author_facet Marianna Mini
Kleopatra Diakogiorgi
Aggeliki Fotopoulou
author_sort Marianna Mini
collection DOAJ
description The present paper contains two distinct yet intricately linked studies concerning idiomatic phrases in Greek: a linguistic study and a psycholinguistic study. The linguistic study aims at investigating the degree of fixedness of idiomatic phrases, through a semantic-lexical categorization of 470 phrases with fixed subject. Three phrase categories were distinguished: typical phrases characterized by a strong semantic-lexical articulation between their constituents, and non-typical phrases, in which the constituents have a certain semantic autonomy. Non-typical phrases were further categorized into a) quasi-phrases and b) conventionalized phrases, the constituents of which have the highest degree of semantic autonomy. Α linguistic model was developed named “graded fixedness model”, and the psycholinguistic relevance of the model assessed by examining idiom comprehension in Greek elementary school children, aged 7.5 and 9.5 years old. To achieve this, a psycholinguistic study was then carried out. Children were presented with 8 typical, 8 quasi and 8 conventionalized phrases. For each phrase, they were asked to choose the one they thought correct out of three interpretations proposed (idiomatic, literal and other). The research findings presented and discussed herein provide evidence supporting the psychological reality of the notion of semantic autonomy even for the younger children’s processing which was overall quite poor: thus, the greater the semantic autonomy of a phrase’s constituents, the easier the access to its idiomatic meaning.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T15:04:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c141d8a983f47d5a58543185386e5a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1963-1723
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T15:04:42Z
publishDate 2011-12-01
publisher Presses universitaires de Caen
record_format Article
series Discours
spelling doaj.art-2c141d8a983f47d5a58543185386e5a82022-12-22T01:00:59ZengPresses universitaires de CaenDiscours1963-17232011-12-01910.4000/discours.8579What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic modelMarianna MiniKleopatra DiakogiorgiAggeliki FotopoulouThe present paper contains two distinct yet intricately linked studies concerning idiomatic phrases in Greek: a linguistic study and a psycholinguistic study. The linguistic study aims at investigating the degree of fixedness of idiomatic phrases, through a semantic-lexical categorization of 470 phrases with fixed subject. Three phrase categories were distinguished: typical phrases characterized by a strong semantic-lexical articulation between their constituents, and non-typical phrases, in which the constituents have a certain semantic autonomy. Non-typical phrases were further categorized into a) quasi-phrases and b) conventionalized phrases, the constituents of which have the highest degree of semantic autonomy. Α linguistic model was developed named “graded fixedness model”, and the psycholinguistic relevance of the model assessed by examining idiom comprehension in Greek elementary school children, aged 7.5 and 9.5 years old. To achieve this, a psycholinguistic study was then carried out. Children were presented with 8 typical, 8 quasi and 8 conventionalized phrases. For each phrase, they were asked to choose the one they thought correct out of three interpretations proposed (idiomatic, literal and other). The research findings presented and discussed herein provide evidence supporting the psychological reality of the notion of semantic autonomy even for the younger children’s processing which was overall quite poor: thus, the greater the semantic autonomy of a phrase’s constituents, the easier the access to its idiomatic meaning.http://journals.openedition.org/discours/8579developmentelementary school childrengraded fixedness modelidiomatic phrasepsycholinguistic relevancesemantic autonomy
spellingShingle Marianna Mini
Kleopatra Diakogiorgi
Aggeliki Fotopoulou
What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model
Discours
development
elementary school children
graded fixedness model
idiomatic phrase
psycholinguistic relevance
semantic autonomy
title What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model
title_full What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model
title_fullStr What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model
title_full_unstemmed What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model
title_short What can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases? The psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model
title_sort what can children tell us about the fixedness of idiomatic phrases the psycholinguistic relevance of a linguistic model
topic development
elementary school children
graded fixedness model
idiomatic phrase
psycholinguistic relevance
semantic autonomy
url http://journals.openedition.org/discours/8579
work_keys_str_mv AT mariannamini whatcanchildrentellusaboutthefixednessofidiomaticphrasesthepsycholinguisticrelevanceofalinguisticmodel
AT kleopatradiakogiorgi whatcanchildrentellusaboutthefixednessofidiomaticphrasesthepsycholinguisticrelevanceofalinguisticmodel
AT aggelikifotopoulou whatcanchildrentellusaboutthefixednessofidiomaticphrasesthepsycholinguisticrelevanceofalinguisticmodel