Comparison of continuous versus intermittent enteral feeding in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background The enteral route is commonly utilised to support the nutritional requirements of critically ill patients. However, there is paucity of data guiding clinicians regarding the appropriate method of delivering the prescribed dose. Continuous enteral feeding is commonly used; however...
Main Authors: | Aaron J. Heffernan, C. Talekar, M. Henain, L. Purcell, M. Palmer, H. White |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Critical Care |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-022-04140-8 |
Similar Items
-
Continuous versus Intermittent Enteral Feeding in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review
by: Xenophon Theodoridis, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01) -
Effects of continuous versus bolus enteral feeding in trauma patients: A randomized clinical trial
by: Leila Banaei, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01) -
Respiratory Complications of Small-Bore Feeding Tube Insertion in Critically Ill Patients
by: Kyoung-Jin Choi, et al.
Published: (2015-04-01) -
Continuous versus Intermittent Enteral Tube Feeding for Critically Ill Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial
by: Hong-Yeul Lee, et al.
Published: (2022-02-01) -
The effect of intermittent versus continuous enteral feeding for critically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
by: Jing Qu, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)