How Low Can You Go? Transfer of Low-Grade Blastocysts

Background: Low grade blastocyst (LGB) transfer results in varied live birth rates (5-39%). Only limited studies with small sample sizes (n=10-440) exist, due to LGB transfer being less desirable. Definitions of LGB and study designs are heterogenous, further confounding outcome interpretation. Aim:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Haowen ZOU, James KEMPER, Elizabeth HAMMOND, Yanhe LIU, Fengqin XU, Gensheng LIU, Haitao XI, Lintao XUE, Xiaohong BAI, Hongqing LIAO, Songguo XUE, Shuqin ZHAO, Aijun ZHANG, Masoud AFNAN, Rui WANG, Ben MOL, Dean MORBECK
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: World Scientific Publishing 2022-09-01
Series:Fertility & Reproduction
Online Access:https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2661318222740826
Description
Summary:Background: Low grade blastocyst (LGB) transfer results in varied live birth rates (5-39%). Only limited studies with small sample sizes (n=10-440) exist, due to LGB transfer being less desirable. Definitions of LGB and study designs are heterogenous, further confounding outcome interpretation. Aim: This study aimed to obtain sufficient LGB transfers to determine live birth rates, as well as allow subgroup analysis by blastocyst quality and maternal age. Method: This study was a multicentre, multinational retrospective cohort study across nine IVF clinics in China and New Zealand between 2012 to 2019. 6966 single blastocyst transfer cycles on days 5-7 (fresh and frozen) were collected; of these, 875 transfers were from LGBs (<3BB). Blastocysts with expansion stage 1 or 2 (early blastocysts) were excluded. The main outcome was live birth rate. Blastocysts were grouped according to quality grade: good-grade blastocysts (GGBs; n=3849, AA, AB and BA), moderate-grade blastocysts (MGBs; n=2242, BB) and LGBs (n=875, AC, CA, BC, CB and CC). Live birth rates were compared using the Pearson Chi-squared test. A logistic regression analysis examined the relationship between blastocyst grade and live birth after adjustment for confounders: clinic, female age, expansion stage, and blastocyst age. Results: Live birth rates for GGBs, MGBs and LGBs were 45%, 36% and 28% respectively (p<0.0001). Within the LGB group, the highest live birth rates were for grade C TE (30%) and the lowest were for grade C ICM (19%). The lowest combined grade (CC) had a 15% live birth rate (n=7/48). The odds of live birth were 2.33 (95% CI = 1.88-2.89) for GGBs compared to LGBs and 1.56 (95% CI = 1.28-1.92) for MGBs compared to LGBs following fresh and frozen blastocyst transfers (p<0.0001). The odds of live birth according to ICM grade were 1.31 (A versus B; 95% CI = 1.15-1.48), 2.82 (A versus C; 95% CI = 1.91-4.18) and 2.16 (B versus C; 95% CI = 1.48-3.16; all p<0.0001). The odds of live birth according to TE grade were 1.33 (A versus B; 95% CI = 1.17-1.50, p<0.0001), 1.85 (A versus C; 95% CI = 1.45-2.34, p<0.0001) and 1.39 (B versus C; 95% CI = 1.12-1.73, p=0.0024). Conclusion: The live birth rate for LGBs is 28%, with rates ranging between 15-31% for the different inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE) subgroups of LGBs. Even those in the lowest grading tier maintain modest live birth rates (15%; CC). Thus, these can be considered for transfer in women with few other options.
ISSN:2661-3182
2661-3174