A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care

Abstract Objective This study adapted Improving Cancer Patients’ Insurance Choices (I Can PIC), an intervention to help cancer patients navigate health insurance decisions and care costs. The original intervention improved knowledge and confidence making insurance decisions, however, users felt limi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Miles E. Charles, Lindsay M. Kuroki, Ana A. Baumann, Rachel G. Tabak, Aimee James, Krista Cooksey, Mary C. Politi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-09-01
Series:BMC Research Notes
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06189-8
_version_ 1811273599335530496
author Miles E. Charles
Lindsay M. Kuroki
Ana A. Baumann
Rachel G. Tabak
Aimee James
Krista Cooksey
Mary C. Politi
author_facet Miles E. Charles
Lindsay M. Kuroki
Ana A. Baumann
Rachel G. Tabak
Aimee James
Krista Cooksey
Mary C. Politi
author_sort Miles E. Charles
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective This study adapted Improving Cancer Patients’ Insurance Choices (I Can PIC), an intervention to help cancer patients navigate health insurance decisions and care costs. The original intervention improved knowledge and confidence making insurance decisions, however, users felt limited by choices provided in insurance markets. Using decision trees and frameworks to guide adaptations, we modified I Can PIC to focus on using rather than choosing health insurance. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unforeseen obstacles, prompting changes to study protocols. As a result, we allowed users outside of the study to use I Can PIC (> 1050 guest users) to optimize public benefit. This paper describes the steps took to conduct the study, evaluating both the effectiveness of I Can PIC and the implementation process to improve its impact. Results Although I Can PIC users had higher knowledge and health insurance literacy compared to the control group, results were not statistically significant. This outcome may be associated with systems-level challenges as well as the number and demographic characteristics of participants. The publicly available tool can be a resource for those navigating insurance and care costs, and researchers can use this flexible approach to intervention delivery and testing as future health emergencies arise.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T23:02:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c1decf23af747399d43961dbee25c27
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1756-0500
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T23:02:09Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Research Notes
spelling doaj.art-2c1decf23af747399d43961dbee25c272022-12-22T03:13:00ZengBMCBMC Research Notes1756-05002022-09-011511610.1186/s13104-022-06189-8A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer careMiles E. Charles0Lindsay M. Kuroki1Ana A. Baumann2Rachel G. Tabak3Aimee James4Krista Cooksey5Mary C. Politi6Division of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineBrown School, Washington UniversityDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineDivision of Public Health Sciences, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of MedicineAbstract Objective This study adapted Improving Cancer Patients’ Insurance Choices (I Can PIC), an intervention to help cancer patients navigate health insurance decisions and care costs. The original intervention improved knowledge and confidence making insurance decisions, however, users felt limited by choices provided in insurance markets. Using decision trees and frameworks to guide adaptations, we modified I Can PIC to focus on using rather than choosing health insurance. The COVID-19 pandemic introduced unforeseen obstacles, prompting changes to study protocols. As a result, we allowed users outside of the study to use I Can PIC (> 1050 guest users) to optimize public benefit. This paper describes the steps took to conduct the study, evaluating both the effectiveness of I Can PIC and the implementation process to improve its impact. Results Although I Can PIC users had higher knowledge and health insurance literacy compared to the control group, results were not statistically significant. This outcome may be associated with systems-level challenges as well as the number and demographic characteristics of participants. The publicly available tool can be a resource for those navigating insurance and care costs, and researchers can use this flexible approach to intervention delivery and testing as future health emergencies arise.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06189-8ImplementationAdaptationDecision scienceHealth insuranceHealth policy
spellingShingle Miles E. Charles
Lindsay M. Kuroki
Ana A. Baumann
Rachel G. Tabak
Aimee James
Krista Cooksey
Mary C. Politi
A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care
BMC Research Notes
Implementation
Adaptation
Decision science
Health insurance
Health policy
title A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care
title_full A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care
title_fullStr A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care
title_full_unstemmed A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care
title_short A case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care
title_sort case study of adapting a health insurance decision intervention from trial into routine cancer care
topic Implementation
Adaptation
Decision science
Health insurance
Health policy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-022-06189-8
work_keys_str_mv AT milesecharles acasestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT lindsaymkuroki acasestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT anaabaumann acasestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT rachelgtabak acasestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT aimeejames acasestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT kristacooksey acasestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT marycpoliti acasestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT milesecharles casestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT lindsaymkuroki casestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT anaabaumann casestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT rachelgtabak casestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT aimeejames casestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT kristacooksey casestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare
AT marycpoliti casestudyofadaptingahealthinsurancedecisioninterventionfromtrialintoroutinecancercare