Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ıntervention

Aim: Non-culprit lesion severity has often been exaggerated at the time of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to determine changes in non-culprit lesions severity on follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) and independent predictors of these changes. Material and Methods...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Aydın Yıldırım, Selahattin Turen, Fuat Caner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rabia Yılmaz 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Contemporary Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1481104
_version_ 1797860604168372224
author Aydın Yıldırım
Selahattin Turen
Fuat Caner
author_facet Aydın Yıldırım
Selahattin Turen
Fuat Caner
author_sort Aydın Yıldırım
collection DOAJ
description Aim: Non-culprit lesion severity has often been exaggerated at the time of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to determine changes in non-culprit lesions severity on follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) and independent predictors of these changes. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the changes in non-culprit lesion stenosis on follow-up CAG which was done within 2 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) in patients presenting with STEMI. Results: 154 patients were included in this study and 207 non-culprit lesions (percentage diameter stenosis (PDS) ≥50%) were compared using quantitative coronary analyses (QCA). Minimal lumen diameter (1.30 ± 0.38 mm vs. 1.54 ± 0.46 mm, p lt;0.001) and reference vessel diameter (2.88 ± 0.66 mm vs. 2.92 ± 0.64 mm, p=0.001) were increased significantly and PDS (54.49 ± 9.38 vs. 47.5 ± 11.17, p lt;0.001) and percentage area stenosis (78.38 ± 8.65 vs. 71.29 ± 11.84, p= lt;0.001) were decreased significantly. There was no significant change in lesion length (13.52 ± 5.59 mm vs. 13.25 ± 5.31 mm, p= 0.078). 65 (31.4%) of these significant lesions (PDS ≥50% by QCA) were regressed (less than 50%) on follow-up CAG. In multivariable analyses; current smoking, clopidogrel use after the P-PCI and history of coronary artery disease were the independent predictors of decrease in PDS. Conclusion: Significant exaggeration of non-culprit lesion stenosis severity occurs at the time of acute STEMI.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T21:49:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c20c57dfcbd45b9a91507bca0ab6dbd
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2667-7180
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T21:49:36Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher Rabia Yılmaz
record_format Article
series Journal of Contemporary Medicine
spelling doaj.art-2c20c57dfcbd45b9a91507bca0ab6dbd2023-03-24T19:43:25ZengRabia YılmazJournal of Contemporary Medicine2667-71802021-07-0111453754210.16899/jcm.8512811809Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ınterventionAydın Yıldırım0Selahattin Turen1Fuat Caner2İstanbul Medipol ÜniversitesiSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi İstanbul Mehmet Akif Ersoy Göğüs Kalp ve Damar Cerrahisi Eğitim ve Araştırma HastanesiBatman Devlet HastanesiAim: Non-culprit lesion severity has often been exaggerated at the time of acute ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to determine changes in non-culprit lesions severity on follow-up coronary angiography (CAG) and independent predictors of these changes. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the changes in non-culprit lesion stenosis on follow-up CAG which was done within 2 months after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (P-PCI) in patients presenting with STEMI. Results: 154 patients were included in this study and 207 non-culprit lesions (percentage diameter stenosis (PDS) ≥50%) were compared using quantitative coronary analyses (QCA). Minimal lumen diameter (1.30 ± 0.38 mm vs. 1.54 ± 0.46 mm, p lt;0.001) and reference vessel diameter (2.88 ± 0.66 mm vs. 2.92 ± 0.64 mm, p=0.001) were increased significantly and PDS (54.49 ± 9.38 vs. 47.5 ± 11.17, p lt;0.001) and percentage area stenosis (78.38 ± 8.65 vs. 71.29 ± 11.84, p= lt;0.001) were decreased significantly. There was no significant change in lesion length (13.52 ± 5.59 mm vs. 13.25 ± 5.31 mm, p= 0.078). 65 (31.4%) of these significant lesions (PDS ≥50% by QCA) were regressed (less than 50%) on follow-up CAG. In multivariable analyses; current smoking, clopidogrel use after the P-PCI and history of coronary artery disease were the independent predictors of decrease in PDS. Conclusion: Significant exaggeration of non-culprit lesion stenosis severity occurs at the time of acute STEMI.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1481104primary percutaneous coronary interventionmulti-vessel diseasenon-culprit lesionquantitative coronary analysisprimer perkütan koroner girişimçoklu damar hastalığısorumlu olmayan lezyonkantitatif koroner analiz
spellingShingle Aydın Yıldırım
Selahattin Turen
Fuat Caner
Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ıntervention
Journal of Contemporary Medicine
primary percutaneous coronary intervention
multi-vessel disease
non-culprit lesion
quantitative coronary analysis
primer perkütan koroner girişim
çoklu damar hastalığı
sorumlu olmayan lezyon
kantitatif koroner analiz
title Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ıntervention
title_full Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ıntervention
title_fullStr Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ıntervention
title_full_unstemmed Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ıntervention
title_short Changes in non-culprit lesion severity on follow-up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary ıntervention
title_sort changes in non culprit lesion severity on follow up coronary angiography after primary percutaneous coronary intervention
topic primary percutaneous coronary intervention
multi-vessel disease
non-culprit lesion
quantitative coronary analysis
primer perkütan koroner girişim
çoklu damar hastalığı
sorumlu olmayan lezyon
kantitatif koroner analiz
url https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/1481104
work_keys_str_mv AT aydınyıldırım changesinnonculpritlesionseverityonfollowupcoronaryangiographyafterprimarypercutaneouscoronaryıntervention
AT selahattinturen changesinnonculpritlesionseverityonfollowupcoronaryangiographyafterprimarypercutaneouscoronaryıntervention
AT fuatcaner changesinnonculpritlesionseverityonfollowupcoronaryangiographyafterprimarypercutaneouscoronaryıntervention