Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFE

In the past, the dry mixed conifer forests of California’s Sierra Nevada mountains experienced frequent low to mixed severity fires. However, due to fire suppression and past management, forest structure has changed, and the new fire regimes are characterized by large, high severity fires which kill...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Iris Allen, Natalie Pawlikowski, Sophan Chhin, Michael Premer, Jianwei Zhang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-06-01
Series:Forests
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/6/1223
_version_ 1797594717650681856
author Iris Allen
Natalie Pawlikowski
Sophan Chhin
Michael Premer
Jianwei Zhang
author_facet Iris Allen
Natalie Pawlikowski
Sophan Chhin
Michael Premer
Jianwei Zhang
author_sort Iris Allen
collection DOAJ
description In the past, the dry mixed conifer forests of California’s Sierra Nevada mountains experienced frequent low to mixed severity fires. However, due to fire suppression and past management, forest structure has changed, and the new fire regimes are characterized by large, high severity fires which kill a majority of the overstory trees. These new disturbance patterns require novel approaches to regenerate the forest as they are not adapted to large, high severity fires. We forecasted growth and fire behavior of young plantations for 100 years into the future using the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) and its Fire and Fuels Extension (FFE). In these simulations, we tested combinations of different fuel treatments (mastication only, mastication with prescribed burning, and no fuels treatments) with different overstory thinning intensities (residual densities of 370 SDI (stand density index), 495 SDI, 618 SDI (TPH), and no overstory thinning) on stand growth and potential fire behavior using analysis of variance. We compared growth and crowning index at the end of the simulation and the simulation age when the flame length, basal area mortality, and fire type reached low severity between fuel treatment, thinning intensity, and original management of stands (plantation with PCT [precommercial thinning], plantation without PCT, and natural regenerating stands). These comparisons are essential to identify which fuel treatment categories reduce fire risk. We found an overall pattern of decreasing crown fire occurrence and fire induced mortality across all simulations due to increasing canopy base height and decreasing canopy bulk density. In particular, stands with mastication and prescribed burning transitioned from crown fire types to surface fires 10 years earlier compared to mastication only or no fuel treatment. Furthermore, pre-commercially thinned stands transitioned from crown fire states to surface fires 10 years earlier in the simulations compared to un-thinned and naturally regenerating stands. Stands with mastication and burning went below 25% reference threshold of basal area mortality 11 and 17 years earlier before the mastication only and no fuel treatment, respectively. In addition, pre-commercially thinned stands went below 25% basal area mortality 9 and 5 years earlier in the simulation compared to un-thinned or naturally regenerated stands, respectively. Mastication with prescribed burning (MB) was the most effective treatment for quickly reducing fire behavior by consuming surface fuels, thus drastically lowing flame length (e.g., surface flame length of MB was 0.6 m compared to mastication only [1.3 m] and no treatment [1.4 m]). Furthermore, intensive thinning reduced risk of active crown fires spreading through the stand. Prioritizing prescribed burning, when possible, and thinning (both pre-commercially and from below) are the most effective ways to quickly improve fire resistance in mixed conifer plantations. Our results highlight the different stressors that post-fire planted forests experience and how different silvicultural treatments interact over time to reduce fire risk, which demonstrates the importance of treating stands early and the effectiveness of surface fuel treatments.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T02:27:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c49e0edd71547ca96d1be581155d6c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1999-4907
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T02:27:20Z
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Forests
spelling doaj.art-2c49e0edd71547ca96d1be581155d6c32023-11-18T10:28:03ZengMDPI AGForests1999-49072023-06-01146122310.3390/f14061223Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFEIris Allen0Natalie Pawlikowski1Sophan Chhin2Michael Premer3Jianwei Zhang4Division of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, 322 Percival Hall, 1145 Evansdale Dr, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADivision of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, 322 Percival Hall, 1145 Evansdale Dr, Morgantown, WV 26506, USADivision of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Virginia University, 322 Percival Hall, 1145 Evansdale Dr, Morgantown, WV 26506, USASchool of Forest Resources, University of Maine, 5755 Nutting Hall, Orono, ME 04469, USAUnited States Department of Agriculture—Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, 3644 Avtech Parkway, Redding, CA 96002, USAIn the past, the dry mixed conifer forests of California’s Sierra Nevada mountains experienced frequent low to mixed severity fires. However, due to fire suppression and past management, forest structure has changed, and the new fire regimes are characterized by large, high severity fires which kill a majority of the overstory trees. These new disturbance patterns require novel approaches to regenerate the forest as they are not adapted to large, high severity fires. We forecasted growth and fire behavior of young plantations for 100 years into the future using the Forest Vegetation Simulator (FVS) and its Fire and Fuels Extension (FFE). In these simulations, we tested combinations of different fuel treatments (mastication only, mastication with prescribed burning, and no fuels treatments) with different overstory thinning intensities (residual densities of 370 SDI (stand density index), 495 SDI, 618 SDI (TPH), and no overstory thinning) on stand growth and potential fire behavior using analysis of variance. We compared growth and crowning index at the end of the simulation and the simulation age when the flame length, basal area mortality, and fire type reached low severity between fuel treatment, thinning intensity, and original management of stands (plantation with PCT [precommercial thinning], plantation without PCT, and natural regenerating stands). These comparisons are essential to identify which fuel treatment categories reduce fire risk. We found an overall pattern of decreasing crown fire occurrence and fire induced mortality across all simulations due to increasing canopy base height and decreasing canopy bulk density. In particular, stands with mastication and prescribed burning transitioned from crown fire types to surface fires 10 years earlier compared to mastication only or no fuel treatment. Furthermore, pre-commercially thinned stands transitioned from crown fire states to surface fires 10 years earlier in the simulations compared to un-thinned and naturally regenerating stands. Stands with mastication and burning went below 25% reference threshold of basal area mortality 11 and 17 years earlier before the mastication only and no fuel treatment, respectively. In addition, pre-commercially thinned stands went below 25% basal area mortality 9 and 5 years earlier in the simulation compared to un-thinned or naturally regenerated stands, respectively. Mastication with prescribed burning (MB) was the most effective treatment for quickly reducing fire behavior by consuming surface fuels, thus drastically lowing flame length (e.g., surface flame length of MB was 0.6 m compared to mastication only [1.3 m] and no treatment [1.4 m]). Furthermore, intensive thinning reduced risk of active crown fires spreading through the stand. Prioritizing prescribed burning, when possible, and thinning (both pre-commercially and from below) are the most effective ways to quickly improve fire resistance in mixed conifer plantations. Our results highlight the different stressors that post-fire planted forests experience and how different silvicultural treatments interact over time to reduce fire risk, which demonstrates the importance of treating stands early and the effectiveness of surface fuel treatments.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/6/1223fire behaviorfire managementmechanical thinningmontane forestsprescribed fire
spellingShingle Iris Allen
Natalie Pawlikowski
Sophan Chhin
Michael Premer
Jianwei Zhang
Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFE
Forests
fire behavior
fire management
mechanical thinning
montane forests
prescribed fire
title Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFE
title_full Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFE
title_fullStr Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFE
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFE
title_short Modeling Juvenile Stand Development and Fire Risk of Post-Fire Planted Forests under Variations in Thinning and Fuel Treatments Using FVS–FFE
title_sort modeling juvenile stand development and fire risk of post fire planted forests under variations in thinning and fuel treatments using fvs ffe
topic fire behavior
fire management
mechanical thinning
montane forests
prescribed fire
url https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4907/14/6/1223
work_keys_str_mv AT irisallen modelingjuvenilestanddevelopmentandfireriskofpostfireplantedforestsundervariationsinthinningandfueltreatmentsusingfvsffe
AT nataliepawlikowski modelingjuvenilestanddevelopmentandfireriskofpostfireplantedforestsundervariationsinthinningandfueltreatmentsusingfvsffe
AT sophanchhin modelingjuvenilestanddevelopmentandfireriskofpostfireplantedforestsundervariationsinthinningandfueltreatmentsusingfvsffe
AT michaelpremer modelingjuvenilestanddevelopmentandfireriskofpostfireplantedforestsundervariationsinthinningandfueltreatmentsusingfvsffe
AT jianweizhang modelingjuvenilestanddevelopmentandfireriskofpostfireplantedforestsundervariationsinthinningandfueltreatmentsusingfvsffe