Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review

The aim of this study was to review the validity of the commonly adopted local positioning systems (LPSs) in sports settings for measuring athletes’ external load (i.e. distances, speeds, accelerations, and decelerations), with a special focus on systems using radio-frequency identification (RFID) a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Daniele Conte
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Termedia Publishing House 2020-07-01
Series:Human Movement
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.termedia.pl/Validity-of-local-positioning-systems-to-measure-external-load-in-sport-settings-a-brief-review,129,40289,1,1.html
_version_ 1818586944035094528
author Daniele Conte
author_facet Daniele Conte
author_sort Daniele Conte
collection DOAJ
description The aim of this study was to review the validity of the commonly adopted local positioning systems (LPSs) in sports settings for measuring athletes’ external load (i.e. distances, speeds, accelerations, and decelerations), with a special focus on systems using radio-frequency identification (RFID) and ultra-wideband (UWB) technology. The reviewed articles showed that the validity of 6 LPSs including both RFID and UWB technologies was assessed by documenting acceptable validity for measuring distances (< 3.5% difference) when compared with reference systems across different activities and sports (indoor and outdoor). Inconsistent results have been presented for average speeds, with difference from reference systems of up to 35%. Additionally, high differences have been revealed for accelerations (up to 12%) and decelerations (up to 84%) during movements including changes of directions and for high-intensity speeds (up to 43% difference) during small-sided games. Finally, the reviewed studies suggest a higher validity in measuring instant speeds and accelerations in LPSs compared with other tracking systems (global positioning systems and video-based systems). In conclusion, this review paper implies acceptable validity of the investigated LPSs in measuring distances, while caution should be observed when measuring speeds, accelerations, and decelerations. Moreover, this review provides sports coaches, practitioners, and club directors with valuable information on purchasing and using LPSs in sports settings.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:01:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c5de227c55642d8932130bcbf76e526
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1899-1955
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:01:00Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format Article
series Human Movement
spelling doaj.art-2c5de227c55642d8932130bcbf76e5262022-12-21T22:37:11ZengTermedia Publishing HouseHuman Movement1899-19552020-07-01214303610.5114/hm.2020.9420040289Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief reviewDaniele ConteThe aim of this study was to review the validity of the commonly adopted local positioning systems (LPSs) in sports settings for measuring athletes’ external load (i.e. distances, speeds, accelerations, and decelerations), with a special focus on systems using radio-frequency identification (RFID) and ultra-wideband (UWB) technology. The reviewed articles showed that the validity of 6 LPSs including both RFID and UWB technologies was assessed by documenting acceptable validity for measuring distances (< 3.5% difference) when compared with reference systems across different activities and sports (indoor and outdoor). Inconsistent results have been presented for average speeds, with difference from reference systems of up to 35%. Additionally, high differences have been revealed for accelerations (up to 12%) and decelerations (up to 84%) during movements including changes of directions and for high-intensity speeds (up to 43% difference) during small-sided games. Finally, the reviewed studies suggest a higher validity in measuring instant speeds and accelerations in LPSs compared with other tracking systems (global positioning systems and video-based systems). In conclusion, this review paper implies acceptable validity of the investigated LPSs in measuring distances, while caution should be observed when measuring speeds, accelerations, and decelerations. Moreover, this review provides sports coaches, practitioners, and club directors with valuable information on purchasing and using LPSs in sports settings.https://www.termedia.pl/Validity-of-local-positioning-systems-to-measure-external-load-in-sport-settings-a-brief-review,129,40289,1,1.htmlultra-wideband radio-frequency identification construct validity catapult wimu pro
spellingShingle Daniele Conte
Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review
Human Movement
ultra-wideband
radio-frequency identification
construct validity
catapult
wimu pro
title Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review
title_full Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review
title_fullStr Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review
title_full_unstemmed Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review
title_short Validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings: a brief review
title_sort validity of local positioning systems to measure external load in sport settings a brief review
topic ultra-wideband
radio-frequency identification
construct validity
catapult
wimu pro
url https://www.termedia.pl/Validity-of-local-positioning-systems-to-measure-external-load-in-sport-settings-a-brief-review,129,40289,1,1.html
work_keys_str_mv AT danieleconte validityoflocalpositioningsystemstomeasureexternalloadinsportsettingsabriefreview