Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Christianity
This paper explores the implications of Kierkegaard’s concern with the existential meaning of Christianity on his treatment of the relationship between philosophy and theology. It will be argued that Kierkegaard offers an existential corrective to the predominantly scholarly-scientific engagement wi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2019-07-01
|
| Series: | Open Theology |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0010 |
| _version_ | 1819023319881482240 |
|---|---|
| author | Li Elizabeth |
| author_facet | Li Elizabeth |
| author_sort | Li Elizabeth |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper explores the implications of Kierkegaard’s concern with the existential meaning of Christianity on his treatment of the relationship between philosophy and theology. It will be argued that Kierkegaard offers an existential corrective to the predominantly scholarly-scientific engagement with this debate, to point to the much more serious matter of the individual’s existence and the impossible difficulty and challenge that the religious sphere poses to the human being, both epistemologically and ethically. This will be shown by taking into account Kierkegaard’s definitions of the terms philosophy, theology, and Christianity, as well as the distinction he draws between objective and subjective philosophy: Whereas Kierkegaard separates from Christianity what can be termed objective philosophy (in particular Hegelian-speculative philosophy), subjective philosophy (specifically Socratic philosophy) is revealed to have a much more complex relationship to the religious sphere. Socratic philosophy’s relationship to Christianity is ultimately kept in a dynamic tension of similarity and dissimilarity, or analogy and contrast, which reflects the difficulty of Christian existence. As such, this reconceptualised debate, for Kierkegaard, does not belong within a scholarly academic context, but rather annihilates such inquiry. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:37:01Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2c67359c9e7b479ba5a79745250d11be |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2300-6579 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T04:37:01Z |
| publishDate | 2019-07-01 |
| publisher | De Gruyter |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Open Theology |
| spelling | doaj.art-2c67359c9e7b479ba5a79745250d11be2022-12-21T19:15:49ZengDe GruyterOpen Theology2300-65792019-07-015113614610.1515/opth-2019-0010opth-2019-0010Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and ChristianityLi Elizabeth0University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern IrelandThis paper explores the implications of Kierkegaard’s concern with the existential meaning of Christianity on his treatment of the relationship between philosophy and theology. It will be argued that Kierkegaard offers an existential corrective to the predominantly scholarly-scientific engagement with this debate, to point to the much more serious matter of the individual’s existence and the impossible difficulty and challenge that the religious sphere poses to the human being, both epistemologically and ethically. This will be shown by taking into account Kierkegaard’s definitions of the terms philosophy, theology, and Christianity, as well as the distinction he draws between objective and subjective philosophy: Whereas Kierkegaard separates from Christianity what can be termed objective philosophy (in particular Hegelian-speculative philosophy), subjective philosophy (specifically Socratic philosophy) is revealed to have a much more complex relationship to the religious sphere. Socratic philosophy’s relationship to Christianity is ultimately kept in a dynamic tension of similarity and dissimilarity, or analogy and contrast, which reflects the difficulty of Christian existence. As such, this reconceptualised debate, for Kierkegaard, does not belong within a scholarly academic context, but rather annihilates such inquiry.https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0010kierkegaardexistencesocratic philosophysinannihilationdissimilarityreflection |
| spellingShingle | Li Elizabeth Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Christianity Open Theology kierkegaard existence socratic philosophy sin annihilation dissimilarity reflection |
| title | Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Christianity |
| title_full | Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Christianity |
| title_fullStr | Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Christianity |
| title_full_unstemmed | Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Christianity |
| title_short | Kierkegaard’s Existential Conception of the Relationship Between Philosophy and Christianity |
| title_sort | kierkegaard s existential conception of the relationship between philosophy and christianity |
| topic | kierkegaard existence socratic philosophy sin annihilation dissimilarity reflection |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1515/opth-2019-0010 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lielizabeth kierkegaardsexistentialconceptionoftherelationshipbetweenphilosophyandchristianity |