Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review

Abstract Introduction The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) has increased during the past decade, and the focus on how to use them has resulted in a more proactive application. Studies have shown that proactive use of PROMs during treatment improves patient-clinician communication, le...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Anette Stolberg Kargo, Angela Coulter, Pernille Tine Jensen, Karina Dahl Steffensen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:Journal of Ovarian Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-019-0538-9
_version_ 1797968826862665728
author Anette Stolberg Kargo
Angela Coulter
Pernille Tine Jensen
Karina Dahl Steffensen
author_facet Anette Stolberg Kargo
Angela Coulter
Pernille Tine Jensen
Karina Dahl Steffensen
author_sort Anette Stolberg Kargo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Introduction The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) has increased during the past decade, and the focus on how to use them has resulted in a more proactive application. Studies have shown that proactive use of PROMs during treatment improves patient-clinician communication, leads to better symptom management and may prolong survival among advanced cancer patients. Ovarian cancer is a serious disease in which the majority of patients experience recurrence during the follow-up period and suffer from a number of severe symptoms from underlying disease. This systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence on the proactive use of PROMs as a dialogue tool during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients. Results The following databases were searched for relevant literature; PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The search was conducted in April 2019 without any filters or limits. A total of 643 publications were identified, and 48 studies were found to be potentially eligible. Of the 48 papers, none met the final inclusion criterion of using PROMs proactively as a dialogue tool for ovarian cancer patients during follow-up. Conclusion Studies have shown that PROMs can identify otherwise undetected symptoms. Using PROMs proactively during the consultation has been shown to improve symptom management for patients with some other types of cancer. However, we found no studies that had examined the proactive use of PROMs during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients. Future studies should evaluate if the proactive use of PROMs could facilitate a more individualized and more effective follow-up program tailored to the ovarian cancer patient’s needs and preferences.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T02:52:46Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c6d8bd79eba4dbfaabcc353d21f6132
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1757-2215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T02:52:46Z
publishDate 2019-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Journal of Ovarian Research
spelling doaj.art-2c6d8bd79eba4dbfaabcc353d21f61322023-01-02T15:58:18ZengBMCJournal of Ovarian Research1757-22152019-07-011211810.1186/s13048-019-0538-9Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic reviewAnette Stolberg Kargo0Angela Coulter1Pernille Tine Jensen2Karina Dahl Steffensen3Department of Clinical Oncology, Sygehus Lillebalt, Vejle SygehusInstitute of Regional Health Research, University of Southern DenmarkDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University HospitalDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Sygehus Lillebalt, Vejle SygehusAbstract Introduction The use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) has increased during the past decade, and the focus on how to use them has resulted in a more proactive application. Studies have shown that proactive use of PROMs during treatment improves patient-clinician communication, leads to better symptom management and may prolong survival among advanced cancer patients. Ovarian cancer is a serious disease in which the majority of patients experience recurrence during the follow-up period and suffer from a number of severe symptoms from underlying disease. This systematic review was conducted to assess the evidence on the proactive use of PROMs as a dialogue tool during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients. Results The following databases were searched for relevant literature; PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library. The search was conducted in April 2019 without any filters or limits. A total of 643 publications were identified, and 48 studies were found to be potentially eligible. Of the 48 papers, none met the final inclusion criterion of using PROMs proactively as a dialogue tool for ovarian cancer patients during follow-up. Conclusion Studies have shown that PROMs can identify otherwise undetected symptoms. Using PROMs proactively during the consultation has been shown to improve symptom management for patients with some other types of cancer. However, we found no studies that had examined the proactive use of PROMs during follow-up of ovarian cancer patients. Future studies should evaluate if the proactive use of PROMs could facilitate a more individualized and more effective follow-up program tailored to the ovarian cancer patient’s needs and preferences.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-019-0538-9Ovarian cancerFollow-upPatient reported outcomeQuality of life
spellingShingle Anette Stolberg Kargo
Angela Coulter
Pernille Tine Jensen
Karina Dahl Steffensen
Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review
Journal of Ovarian Research
Ovarian cancer
Follow-up
Patient reported outcome
Quality of life
title Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review
title_full Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review
title_fullStr Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review
title_short Proactive use of PROMs in ovarian cancer survivors: a systematic review
title_sort proactive use of proms in ovarian cancer survivors a systematic review
topic Ovarian cancer
Follow-up
Patient reported outcome
Quality of life
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13048-019-0538-9
work_keys_str_mv AT anettestolbergkargo proactiveuseofpromsinovariancancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT angelacoulter proactiveuseofpromsinovariancancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT pernilletinejensen proactiveuseofpromsinovariancancersurvivorsasystematicreview
AT karinadahlsteffensen proactiveuseofpromsinovariancancersurvivorsasystematicreview