Interpretation Of Judges In Supreme Court Decision Number: 46 P/HUM/2018
This research was conducted to determine the interpretation of judges in the Supreme Court Decision No. 46 P/HUM/2018. This study uses a normative type of research with an approach to identifying legislation and literature that is relevant to research. Data collected from primary, secondary, and ter...
Main Authors: | Muslim Andi Yusuf, Dharma Fidyansari |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Substantive Justice International Journal of Law |
Online Access: | https://www.substantivejustice.id/index.php/sucila/article/view/43 |
Similar Items
-
Freedom Of Religion And Belief Under Supreme Court Verdict Study Case On Supreme Court Decision Number 17/P/HUM/2021
by: Ayub, Zainal Amin, et al.
Published: (2023) -
Analysis of Constitutional Court Decision No. 30/Puu-Xvi/2018 and Supreme Court Decision No. 65p/Hum/2018 Concerning the Prohibition of Concurrent Positions for Regional Representative Council Candidates (DPD)
by: Riswan Rais Syarif, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
Decree of the President of the Republic of Indonesia No 55/M of 2020 Concerning Termination and Appointment of Membership No After the Supreme Court Decision Number5P/HUM/2021
by: Novi Hamzah, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Can an Unlawful Judge be the First President of the Supreme Court?
by: Michał Krajewski, et al. -
Perspectives to Strengthening Competencies of Judges in The Supreme Court of The Republic of Indonesia
by: Magya Ramadhania Putri, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)