Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background Surgery is the main treatment option for patients with local gastric cancer. However, surgery alone is usually not sufficient for stomach cancer patients, and combined therapies are recommended for these patients. In recent studies, some preoperative treatments have shown benefit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jianwen Hu, Yanpeng Yang, Yongchen Ma, Yingze Ning, Guowei Chen, Yucun Liu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2022-07-01
Series:Systematic Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02001-7
_version_ 1811219276160303104
author Jianwen Hu
Yanpeng Yang
Yongchen Ma
Yingze Ning
Guowei Chen
Yucun Liu
author_facet Jianwen Hu
Yanpeng Yang
Yongchen Ma
Yingze Ning
Guowei Chen
Yucun Liu
author_sort Jianwen Hu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Surgery is the main treatment option for patients with local gastric cancer. However, surgery alone is usually not sufficient for stomach cancer patients, and combined therapies are recommended for these patients. In recent studies, some preoperative treatments have shown benefits. However, the treatment selection is still uncertain because previous studies failed to obtain a statistically significant difference between preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, we plan to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the benefits among these preoperative treatments. Methods/design This review includes randomized controlled trials with or without blinding as well as published studies, high-quality unpublished studies, full articles and meeting abstracts with an English context if sufficient results were provided for analysis. Data sources include the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, major relevant international conferences and manual screening of references. Patients with a diagnosis of resectable primary gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma (stage II or higher) who underwent surgery alone or preoperative treatment followed by surgery and who were pathologically confirmed as proposed by the AJCC 2017 guidelines without age, sex, race, subtypes of adenocarcinoma and molecular pathology limitations will be included. The following three interventions will be included: surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemistry followed by surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. All-cause mortality, overall survival (OS, the time interval from diagnosis to death) and/or progression-free survival (PFS, the time interval from diagnosis to disease progression or death from any cause) will be defined as major results of concern. The clinical and pathological response rate (according to RECIST and tumour regression score), R0 resection rate, quality of life and grade 3 or above adverse events (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, NCI-CTCAE) will be defined as the secondary outcomes. Discussion The aim of this systematic review is to compare the benefits of different preoperative treatments for patients with locoregional stomach cancer. This systematic review will improve the understanding of the relative efficacy of these treatment options by providing the latest evidence on the efficacy of various treatment options in the management of gastric cancer patients and may guide clinical practice. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD4202123718
first_indexed 2024-04-12T07:23:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c8caff69840455cab09d63320e81daa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2046-4053
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T07:23:26Z
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Systematic Reviews
spelling doaj.art-2c8caff69840455cab09d63320e81daa2022-12-22T03:42:15ZengBMCSystematic Reviews2046-40532022-07-0111111010.1186/s13643-022-02001-7Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysisJianwen Hu0Yanpeng Yang1Yongchen Ma2Yingze Ning3Guowei Chen4Yucun Liu5Department of General Surgery, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First HospitalEndoscopy Center, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First HospitalDepartment of General Surgery, Peking University First HospitalAbstract Background Surgery is the main treatment option for patients with local gastric cancer. However, surgery alone is usually not sufficient for stomach cancer patients, and combined therapies are recommended for these patients. In recent studies, some preoperative treatments have shown benefits. However, the treatment selection is still uncertain because previous studies failed to obtain a statistically significant difference between preoperative chemotherapy and preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Therefore, we plan to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the benefits among these preoperative treatments. Methods/design This review includes randomized controlled trials with or without blinding as well as published studies, high-quality unpublished studies, full articles and meeting abstracts with an English context if sufficient results were provided for analysis. Data sources include the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, major relevant international conferences and manual screening of references. Patients with a diagnosis of resectable primary gastric or EGJ adenocarcinoma (stage II or higher) who underwent surgery alone or preoperative treatment followed by surgery and who were pathologically confirmed as proposed by the AJCC 2017 guidelines without age, sex, race, subtypes of adenocarcinoma and molecular pathology limitations will be included. The following three interventions will be included: surgery alone, neoadjuvant chemistry followed by surgery and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. All-cause mortality, overall survival (OS, the time interval from diagnosis to death) and/or progression-free survival (PFS, the time interval from diagnosis to disease progression or death from any cause) will be defined as major results of concern. The clinical and pathological response rate (according to RECIST and tumour regression score), R0 resection rate, quality of life and grade 3 or above adverse events (according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, NCI-CTCAE) will be defined as the secondary outcomes. Discussion The aim of this systematic review is to compare the benefits of different preoperative treatments for patients with locoregional stomach cancer. This systematic review will improve the understanding of the relative efficacy of these treatment options by providing the latest evidence on the efficacy of various treatment options in the management of gastric cancer patients and may guide clinical practice. Systematic review registration PROSPERO CRD4202123718https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02001-7Gastric cancerPreoperative treatmentsSurgery aloneSystematic reviewMeta-analysis
spellingShingle Jianwen Hu
Yanpeng Yang
Yongchen Ma
Yingze Ning
Guowei Chen
Yucun Liu
Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Systematic Reviews
Gastric cancer
Preoperative treatments
Surgery alone
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
title Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort survival benefits from neoadjuvant treatment in gastric cancer a systematic review and meta analysis
topic Gastric cancer
Preoperative treatments
Surgery alone
Systematic review
Meta-analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-02001-7
work_keys_str_mv AT jianwenhu survivalbenefitsfromneoadjuvanttreatmentingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanpengyang survivalbenefitsfromneoadjuvanttreatmentingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yongchenma survivalbenefitsfromneoadjuvanttreatmentingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yingzening survivalbenefitsfromneoadjuvanttreatmentingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guoweichen survivalbenefitsfromneoadjuvanttreatmentingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yucunliu survivalbenefitsfromneoadjuvanttreatmentingastriccancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis