Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency

Mapping ecosystem services (ESs) is an important tool for providing the quantitative information necessary for the optimal use and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. A common mapping approach is to apply established empirical relationships to ecosystem property maps. Often, ecosystem propert...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rob Alkemade, Catharina J.E. Schulp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2011-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/9/2057/
_version_ 1818958929451810816
author Rob Alkemade
Catharina J.E. Schulp
author_facet Rob Alkemade
Catharina J.E. Schulp
author_sort Rob Alkemade
collection DOAJ
description Mapping ecosystem services (ESs) is an important tool for providing the quantitative information necessary for the optimal use and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. A common mapping approach is to apply established empirical relationships to ecosystem property maps. Often, ecosystem properties that provide services to humanity are strongly related to the land use and land cover, where the spatial allocation of the land cover in the landscape is especially important. Land use and land cover maps are, therefore, essential for ES mapping. However, insight into the uncertainties in land cover maps and how these propagate into ES maps is lacking. To analyze the effects of these uncertainties, we mapped pollination efficiency as an example of an ecosystem function, using two continental-scale land cover maps and two global-scale land cover maps. We compared the outputs with maps based on a detailed national-scale map. The ecosystem properties and functions could be mapped using the GLOBCOVER map with a reasonable to good accuracy. In homogeneous landscapes, an even coarser resolution map would suffice. For mapping ESs that depend on the spatial allocation of land cover in the landscape, a classification of satellite images using fractional land cover or mosaic classes is an asset.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T11:33:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2c8f44bd58e64cc88cd5deb7628db4fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T11:33:33Z
publishDate 2011-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-2c8f44bd58e64cc88cd5deb7628db4fe2022-12-21T19:42:11ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922011-09-01392057207510.3390/rs3092057Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination EfficiencyRob AlkemadeCatharina J.E. SchulpMapping ecosystem services (ESs) is an important tool for providing the quantitative information necessary for the optimal use and protection of ecosystems and biodiversity. A common mapping approach is to apply established empirical relationships to ecosystem property maps. Often, ecosystem properties that provide services to humanity are strongly related to the land use and land cover, where the spatial allocation of the land cover in the landscape is especially important. Land use and land cover maps are, therefore, essential for ES mapping. However, insight into the uncertainties in land cover maps and how these propagate into ES maps is lacking. To analyze the effects of these uncertainties, we mapped pollination efficiency as an example of an ecosystem function, using two continental-scale land cover maps and two global-scale land cover maps. We compared the outputs with maps based on a detailed national-scale map. The ecosystem properties and functions could be mapped using the GLOBCOVER map with a reasonable to good accuracy. In homogeneous landscapes, an even coarser resolution map would suffice. For mapping ESs that depend on the spatial allocation of land cover in the landscape, a classification of satellite images using fractional land cover or mosaic classes is an asset.http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/9/2057/ecosystem functionsecosystem servicesland cover mapsThe Netherlandsgeometric uncertaintythematic uncertainty
spellingShingle Rob Alkemade
Catharina J.E. Schulp
Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency
Remote Sensing
ecosystem functions
ecosystem services
land cover maps
The Netherlands
geometric uncertainty
thematic uncertainty
title Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency
title_full Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency
title_fullStr Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency
title_full_unstemmed Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency
title_short Consequences of Uncertainty in Global-Scale Land Cover Maps for Mapping Ecosystem Functions: An Analysis of Pollination Efficiency
title_sort consequences of uncertainty in global scale land cover maps for mapping ecosystem functions an analysis of pollination efficiency
topic ecosystem functions
ecosystem services
land cover maps
The Netherlands
geometric uncertainty
thematic uncertainty
url http://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/3/9/2057/
work_keys_str_mv AT robalkemade consequencesofuncertaintyinglobalscalelandcovermapsformappingecosystemfunctionsananalysisofpollinationefficiency
AT catharinajeschulp consequencesofuncertaintyinglobalscalelandcovermapsformappingecosystemfunctionsananalysisofpollinationefficiency