Defining key design elements of registry-based randomised controlled trials: a scoping review
Abstract Background Traditional randomised controlled trials remain the gold standard for improving clinical care but they do have their limitations, including their associated high costs, high failure rate and limited external validity. An alternative methodology is the newly defined, prospective,...
Main Authors: | Bill Karanatsios, Khic-Houy Prang, Ebony Verbunt, Justin M. Yeung, Margaret Kelaher, Peter Gibbs |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2020-06-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-020-04459-z |
Similar Items
-
A qualitative study exploring stakeholders’ perceptions of registry-based randomised controlled trials capacity and capability in Australia
by: Bill Karanatsios, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01) -
“Nothing to lose and the possibility of gaining”: a qualitative study on the feasibility and acceptability of registry-based randomised controlled trials among cancer patients and clinicians
by: Khic-Houy Prang, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01) -
Clinical trials in dentistry in India: Analysis from trial registry
by: S Gowri, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01) -
Commentary: On the levels of patient selection in registry-based randomized controlled trials
by: Florian Lasch, et al.
Published: (2019-02-01) -
Registry-based randomised controlled trials: conduct, advantages and challenges—a systematic review
by: Frances Shiely, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)