Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data Product

Abstract A new statistical approach to validating climate models is introduced. First, five observational estimates of global mean surface temperature with estimated standard errors are combined into one data product, latent observed annual global temperature anomalies for the years 1880–2014, using...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter F. Craigmile, Peter Guttorp
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: American Geophysical Union (AGU) 2023-10-01
Series:Earth and Space Science
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002468
_version_ 1797648009951969280
author Peter F. Craigmile
Peter Guttorp
author_facet Peter F. Craigmile
Peter Guttorp
author_sort Peter F. Craigmile
collection DOAJ
description Abstract A new statistical approach to validating climate models is introduced. First, five observational estimates of global mean surface temperature with estimated standard errors are combined into one data product, latent observed annual global temperature anomalies for the years 1880–2014, using a Bayesian hierarchical statistical approach. Summarizing these observed anomalies, estimates of smooth trend, levels of warming, and residual dependence as summarized by the spectral density function, are provided with simultaneous 95% credible bands. Then, corresponding estimates of smooth trend, levels of warming, and residual dependence are produced for sixth Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) historical simulations analyzed at the annual global temperature anomaly scale, and compared to these bands. Among our results, we find that 93 out of the 318 CMIP6 historical model runs contain trends fitting inside the simultaneous bands for the smooth trend constructed from the data products, and for residual temporal dependence 69 out of 318 model runs contain spectral density functions that are within the corresponding data‐product‐based‐bands. We estimate the mean global temperature increase from 1995–2014 relative to 1880–1899, from the data product, to be 0.896°C with a 95% credible interval of between 0.877 and 0.915. We find that 14 CMIP6 model runs agree with this interval, 197 model runs lead to a smaller temperature increase globally, and 107 model runs lead to a larger temperature increase.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T15:25:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2cc85b483a5b44549461a7e059654999
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2333-5084
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T15:25:55Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher American Geophysical Union (AGU)
record_format Article
series Earth and Space Science
spelling doaj.art-2cc85b483a5b44549461a7e0596549992023-10-27T17:48:33ZengAmerican Geophysical Union (AGU)Earth and Space Science2333-50842023-10-011010n/an/a10.1029/2022EA002468Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data ProductPeter F. Craigmile0Peter Guttorp1Department of Mathematics and Statistics Hunter College CUNY New York NY USANorwegian Computing Center Oslo NorwayAbstract A new statistical approach to validating climate models is introduced. First, five observational estimates of global mean surface temperature with estimated standard errors are combined into one data product, latent observed annual global temperature anomalies for the years 1880–2014, using a Bayesian hierarchical statistical approach. Summarizing these observed anomalies, estimates of smooth trend, levels of warming, and residual dependence as summarized by the spectral density function, are provided with simultaneous 95% credible bands. Then, corresponding estimates of smooth trend, levels of warming, and residual dependence are produced for sixth Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) historical simulations analyzed at the annual global temperature anomaly scale, and compared to these bands. Among our results, we find that 93 out of the 318 CMIP6 historical model runs contain trends fitting inside the simultaneous bands for the smooth trend constructed from the data products, and for residual temporal dependence 69 out of 318 model runs contain spectral density functions that are within the corresponding data‐product‐based‐bands. We estimate the mean global temperature increase from 1995–2014 relative to 1880–1899, from the data product, to be 0.896°C with a 95% credible interval of between 0.877 and 0.915. We find that 14 CMIP6 model runs agree with this interval, 197 model runs lead to a smaller temperature increase globally, and 107 model runs lead to a larger temperature increase.https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002468
spellingShingle Peter F. Craigmile
Peter Guttorp
Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data Product
Earth and Space Science
title Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data Product
title_full Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data Product
title_fullStr Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data Product
title_full_unstemmed Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data Product
title_short Comparing CMIP6 Climate Model Simulations of Annual Global Mean Temperatures to a New Combined Data Product
title_sort comparing cmip6 climate model simulations of annual global mean temperatures to a new combined data product
url https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EA002468
work_keys_str_mv AT peterfcraigmile comparingcmip6climatemodelsimulationsofannualglobalmeantemperaturestoanewcombineddataproduct
AT peterguttorp comparingcmip6climatemodelsimulationsofannualglobalmeantemperaturestoanewcombineddataproduct