Reporting on methods of subgroup analysis in clinical trials: a survey of four scientific journals
Results of subgroup analysis (SA) reported in randomized clinical trials (RCT) cannot be adequately interpreted without information about the methods used in the study design and the data analysis. Our aim was to show how often inaccurate or incomplete reports occur. First, we selected eight methodo...
Main Authors: | E.D. Moreira Jr., Z. Stein, E. Susser |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica
2001-11-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-879X2001001100011 |
Similar Items
-
Subgroup analyses in confirmatory clinical trials: time to be specific about their purposes
by: Julien Tanniou, et al.
Published: (2016-02-01) -
Subgroup Analysis in Pulmonary Hypertension-Specific Therapy Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
by: Héctor Rodríguez-Ramallo, et al.
Published: (2022-05-01) -
A meta-epidemiological study of subgroup analyses in cochrane systematic reviews of atrial fibrillation
by: Miney Paquette, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01) -
Specific Aspects and Significance of Subgroup Assessment in Confirmatory Clinical Trials
by: O. I. Basova, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01) -
Development of Randomized Trials in Adults with Medulloblastoma—The Example of EORTC 1634-BTG/NOA-23
by: Peter Hau, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)