What Schrems, Delvigne and Celaj tell us about the state of fundamental rights in the EU
<p>The overall message looks puzzling. First, privacy is a super-fundamental right that reigns supreme above all other rights after the Court’s decision in Schrems. Second, national electoral rules governing the right to vote in elections to the European Parliament come under the scope of appl...
Main Author: | Daniel Sarmiento |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Max Steinbeis Verfassungsblog GmbH
|
Series: | Verfassungsblog |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://verfassungsblog.de/what-schrems-delvigne-and-celaj-tell-us-about-the-state-of-fundamental-rights-in-the-eu/ |
Similar Items
-
Mit den eigenen Waffen geschlagen: Die Reaktion des EuGH auf den unbedingten Vorrang der Menschenwürde vor dem Unionsrecht nach dem BVerfG
by: Heiko Sauer -
The Force awakens – The Schrems case from a German perspective
by: Franz C. Mayer -
Limits on Limitations: The Essence of Fundamental Rights in the EU
by: Koen Lenaerts
Published: (2019-09-01) -
Mutual Trust and EU Accession to the ECHR: Are We Over the Opinion 2/13 Hurdle?
by: Eleonora Di Franco, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
At a Snail’s Pace - How EU Bureaucracy Undermines Fundamental Rights
by: Radosveta Vassileva
Published: (2023-10-01)