Moral preferences in helping dilemmas expressed by matching and forced choice
This paper asks whether moral preferences in eight medical dilemmas change as a function of how preferences are expressed, and how people choose when they are faced with two equally attractive help projects. In two large-scale studies, participants first read dilemmas where they “matched” two sugges...
Main Authors: | Arvid Erlandsson, Amanda Lindkvist, Kajsa Lundqvist, Per A. Andersson, Stephan Dickert, Paul Slovic, Daniel Västfjäll |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2020-07-01
|
Series: | Judgment and Decision Making |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500007427/type/journal_article |
Similar Items
-
Moral preferences in
helping dilemmas expressed by matching and forced choice
by: Arvid Erlandsson, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01) -
Decisions in moral dilemmas: The influence of subjective beliefs in outcome probabilities
by: Yiyun Shou, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Decisions in moral
dilemmas: The influence of subjective beliefs in outcome probabilities
by: Yiyun Shou, et al.
Published: (2017-09-01) -
Verification of the Japanese Version of Greene’s Moral Dilemma Task’s Validity and Reliability
by: Yoshiyuki Takimoto, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01) -
Seven (weak and strong) helping effects systematically tested in separate evaluation, joint evaluation and forced choice
by: Arvid Erlandsson
Published: (2021-09-01)