Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis

Background and objective: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most malignant cancer types that causes substantial economic burden in China. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five first-line anti-PD-(L)1 treatments, including sintilimab, camrelizumab, atezolizumab, p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xi Chen, Mingye Zhao, Lei Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-03-01
Series:Frontiers in Pharmacology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1119906/full
_version_ 1797867165927342080
author Xi Chen
Xi Chen
Mingye Zhao
Mingye Zhao
Lei Tian
Lei Tian
author_facet Xi Chen
Xi Chen
Mingye Zhao
Mingye Zhao
Lei Tian
Lei Tian
author_sort Xi Chen
collection DOAJ
description Background and objective: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most malignant cancer types that causes substantial economic burden in China. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five first-line anti-PD-(L)1 treatments, including sintilimab, camrelizumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab and sugemalimab with each combined with chemotherapy, for treating advanced non-squamous NSCLC (nsq-NSCLC) from Chinese healthcare system perspective.Methods: Clinical data were obtained from the following clinical trials, namely, ORIENT-11, CameL, IMpower132, KEYNOTE-189 and GEMSTONE-302. A network meta-analysis was performed based on fractional polynomial models. We constructed a partitioned survival model with a three-week cycle length and a lifetime horizon to derive the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We performed one-way sensitivity analysis and probablistic sensitivity analysis to test the robustness. Additionally, two scenario analyses were undertaken to investigate the impact of Patient Assistant Program on the economic conclusion and to explore potential uncertainty associated with population representativeness of the global trial.Results: Compared with camrelizumab + chemotherapy, sugemalimab + chemotherapy and atezolizumab + chemotherapy were dominated, and the ICERs generated from sintilimab + chemotherapy and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy were $15,280.83/QALY and $159,784.76/QALY, respectively. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that uncertainty around ICERs was mainly driven by HR related parameters derived from NMA and drug price. The probablistic sensitivity analysis suggested that camrelizumab treatment was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1-time GDP per capita. When the threshold was set as 3-time GDP per capita, sintilimab strategy demonstrated the excellent cost-effective advantage. Sensitivity analysis proved the reliability of base-case results. Results from two scenario analyses indicated that the primary finding was robust.Conclusion: In current context of Chinese healthcare system, sintilimab + chemotherapy appeared to be cost-effective for the treatment of nsq-NSCLC compared with sugemalimab, camrelizumab, pembrolizumab as well as atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T23:35:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d003a328f9d4874841eb3200e256a8c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1663-9812
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T23:35:55Z
publishDate 2023-03-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pharmacology
spelling doaj.art-2d003a328f9d4874841eb3200e256a8c2023-03-20T05:48:49ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pharmacology1663-98122023-03-011410.3389/fphar.2023.11199061119906Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysisXi Chen0Xi Chen1Mingye Zhao2Mingye Zhao3Lei Tian4Lei Tian5Department of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, ChinaCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, ChinaCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, ChinaDepartment of Pharmacoeconomics, School of International Pharmaceutical Business, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, ChinaCenter for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, China Pharmaceutical University, Nanjing, ChinaBackground and objective: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is one of the most malignant cancer types that causes substantial economic burden in China. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of five first-line anti-PD-(L)1 treatments, including sintilimab, camrelizumab, atezolizumab, pembrolizumab and sugemalimab with each combined with chemotherapy, for treating advanced non-squamous NSCLC (nsq-NSCLC) from Chinese healthcare system perspective.Methods: Clinical data were obtained from the following clinical trials, namely, ORIENT-11, CameL, IMpower132, KEYNOTE-189 and GEMSTONE-302. A network meta-analysis was performed based on fractional polynomial models. We constructed a partitioned survival model with a three-week cycle length and a lifetime horizon to derive the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). We performed one-way sensitivity analysis and probablistic sensitivity analysis to test the robustness. Additionally, two scenario analyses were undertaken to investigate the impact of Patient Assistant Program on the economic conclusion and to explore potential uncertainty associated with population representativeness of the global trial.Results: Compared with camrelizumab + chemotherapy, sugemalimab + chemotherapy and atezolizumab + chemotherapy were dominated, and the ICERs generated from sintilimab + chemotherapy and pembrolizumab + chemotherapy were $15,280.83/QALY and $159,784.76/QALY, respectively. Deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that uncertainty around ICERs was mainly driven by HR related parameters derived from NMA and drug price. The probablistic sensitivity analysis suggested that camrelizumab treatment was cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of 1-time GDP per capita. When the threshold was set as 3-time GDP per capita, sintilimab strategy demonstrated the excellent cost-effective advantage. Sensitivity analysis proved the reliability of base-case results. Results from two scenario analyses indicated that the primary finding was robust.Conclusion: In current context of Chinese healthcare system, sintilimab + chemotherapy appeared to be cost-effective for the treatment of nsq-NSCLC compared with sugemalimab, camrelizumab, pembrolizumab as well as atezolizumab combined with chemotherapy.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1119906/fullnon-squamous non-small cell lung cancercost-effectivenesspartitioned survivalfractional polynomialnetwork meta-analysis
spellingShingle Xi Chen
Xi Chen
Mingye Zhao
Mingye Zhao
Lei Tian
Lei Tian
Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis
Frontiers in Pharmacology
non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
cost-effectiveness
partitioned survival
fractional polynomial
network meta-analysis
title Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis
title_full Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis
title_fullStr Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis
title_short Economic evaluation of five first-line PD-(L)1 inhibitors for treating non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in China: A cost-effectiveness analysis based on network meta-analysis
title_sort economic evaluation of five first line pd l 1 inhibitors for treating non squamous non small cell lung cancer in china a cost effectiveness analysis based on network meta analysis
topic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer
cost-effectiveness
partitioned survival
fractional polynomial
network meta-analysis
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fphar.2023.1119906/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xichen economicevaluationoffivefirstlinepdl1inhibitorsfortreatingnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis
AT xichen economicevaluationoffivefirstlinepdl1inhibitorsfortreatingnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mingyezhao economicevaluationoffivefirstlinepdl1inhibitorsfortreatingnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis
AT mingyezhao economicevaluationoffivefirstlinepdl1inhibitorsfortreatingnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis
AT leitian economicevaluationoffivefirstlinepdl1inhibitorsfortreatingnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis
AT leitian economicevaluationoffivefirstlinepdl1inhibitorsfortreatingnonsquamousnonsmallcelllungcancerinchinaacosteffectivenessanalysisbasedonnetworkmetaanalysis