RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study

Background/Aims The management of walled-off necrosis (WON) has undergone a paradigm shift from surgical to nonsurgical modalities. Real-world data on the management of symptomatic WON are scarce. Methods Prospectively collected data of symptomatic WON cases were retrospectively evaluated. The treat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ankush Pawar, Ujjwal Sonika, Manish Kumar, Sundeep Saluja, Siddharth Srivastava
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2021-11-01
Series:Clinical Endoscopy
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-ce.org/upload/pdf/ce-2020-175.pdf
_version_ 1797641266130845696
author Ankush Pawar
Ujjwal Sonika
Manish Kumar
Sundeep Saluja
Siddharth Srivastava
author_facet Ankush Pawar
Ujjwal Sonika
Manish Kumar
Sundeep Saluja
Siddharth Srivastava
author_sort Ankush Pawar
collection DOAJ
description Background/Aims The management of walled-off necrosis (WON) has undergone a paradigm shift from surgical to nonsurgical modalities. Real-world data on the management of symptomatic WON are scarce. Methods Prospectively collected data of symptomatic WON cases were retrospectively evaluated. The treatment modalities used were medical management alone, percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) or endoscopic drainage (ED), or a combination of PCD and ED. We compared clinical outcome among these modalities. Results A total of 264 patients were evaluated. The most common indications for drainage were pain and fever. Of the patients, 28% was treated with medical therapy alone, 31% with ED, 37% with PCD, and 4% with a combined approach. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 93% and 91% of patients in the endoscopic arm and in 90% and 81% patients in the PCD arm, respectively (p=0.0004 for clinical success). Lower rates of complications (7% vs. 22%, p=0.005), readmission (20% vs. 34%, p=0.04), and mortality (4% vs. 19%, p=0.0012), and shorter hospital stay (13 days vs. 19 days, p=0.0018) were observed in the endoscopic group than in the PCD group. Conclusions ED of WON is better than PCD and is associated with lower mortality, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T13:43:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d03535faf604bceafce10e358083e56
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2234-2400
2234-2443
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T13:43:05Z
publishDate 2021-11-01
publisher Korean Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
record_format Article
series Clinical Endoscopy
spelling doaj.art-2d03535faf604bceafce10e358083e562023-11-02T11:17:05ZengKorean Society of Gastrointestinal EndoscopyClinical Endoscopy2234-24002234-24432021-11-0154690991510.5946/ce.2020.1757478RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis StudyAnkush Pawar0Ujjwal Sonika1Manish Kumar2Sundeep Saluja3Siddharth Srivastava4 Department of Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India Department of Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India Department of Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India Department of Gastrosurgery, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, India Department of Gastroenterology, Govind Ballabh Pant Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, New Delhi, IndiaBackground/Aims The management of walled-off necrosis (WON) has undergone a paradigm shift from surgical to nonsurgical modalities. Real-world data on the management of symptomatic WON are scarce. Methods Prospectively collected data of symptomatic WON cases were retrospectively evaluated. The treatment modalities used were medical management alone, percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) or endoscopic drainage (ED), or a combination of PCD and ED. We compared clinical outcome among these modalities. Results A total of 264 patients were evaluated. The most common indications for drainage were pain and fever. Of the patients, 28% was treated with medical therapy alone, 31% with ED, 37% with PCD, and 4% with a combined approach. Technical success and clinical success were achieved in 93% and 91% of patients in the endoscopic arm and in 90% and 81% patients in the PCD arm, respectively (p=0.0004 for clinical success). Lower rates of complications (7% vs. 22%, p=0.005), readmission (20% vs. 34%, p=0.04), and mortality (4% vs. 19%, p=0.0012), and shorter hospital stay (13 days vs. 19 days, p=0.0018) were observed in the endoscopic group than in the PCD group. Conclusions ED of WON is better than PCD and is associated with lower mortality, fewer complications, and shorter hospitalization.http://www.e-ce.org/upload/pdf/ce-2020-175.pdfdrainageendoscopic ultrasoundnecrosispancreatitisself-expandable metallic stent
spellingShingle Ankush Pawar
Ujjwal Sonika
Manish Kumar
Sundeep Saluja
Siddharth Srivastava
RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study
Clinical Endoscopy
drainage
endoscopic ultrasound
necrosis
pancreatitis
self-expandable metallic stent
title RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study
title_full RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study
title_fullStr RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study
title_full_unstemmed RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study
title_short RWON Study: The Real-World Walled-off Necrosis Study
title_sort rwon study the real world walled off necrosis study
topic drainage
endoscopic ultrasound
necrosis
pancreatitis
self-expandable metallic stent
url http://www.e-ce.org/upload/pdf/ce-2020-175.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT ankushpawar rwonstudytherealworldwalledoffnecrosisstudy
AT ujjwalsonika rwonstudytherealworldwalledoffnecrosisstudy
AT manishkumar rwonstudytherealworldwalledoffnecrosisstudy
AT sundeepsaluja rwonstudytherealworldwalledoffnecrosisstudy
AT siddharthsrivastava rwonstudytherealworldwalledoffnecrosisstudy