Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature

This paper is based on the concept of environmental political philosophy and from its perspective, it highlights the weaknesses and contradictions of contemporary, existing democracies. It aims to formulate an outline of the concept of environmental democracy, following the accounts of M. Bookchin,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Richard St’ahel
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie 2023-07-01
Series:Studia Philosophiae Christianae
Subjects:
Online Access:https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/spch/article/view/13089
_version_ 1797305082307411968
author Richard St’ahel
author_facet Richard St’ahel
author_sort Richard St’ahel
collection DOAJ
description This paper is based on the concept of environmental political philosophy and from its perspective, it highlights the weaknesses and contradictions of contemporary, existing democracies. It aims to formulate an outline of the concept of environmental democracy, following the accounts of M. Bookchin, R. Morrison and H. Skolimowski, as well as international environmental law enshrined in United Nations documents and resolutions. It is based on the hypothesis that the preservation of a democratic political system in a situation of a collapsing planetary system (the Anthropocene) requires improving the foundations of democratic theory with the insights of the Earth system sciences, particularly of political ecology and critical environmentalism. Through philosophical analysis, explanation and interpretation, this paper explores an environmental democracy that would, on the one hand, preserve the basic constitutional principles of current democratic constitutional regimes, and, on the other hand, reconcile them with the current state of understanding in the Earth sciences concerning the vulnerability of the planetary system. In a sense, J. Habermas’s understanding of human rights characterizes the concept of environmental democracy as a realistic utopia. The author concludes by drawing up the imperative of sustainability, which he sees as a guiding organizing principle of institutions and public policies for the climatic, demographic and economic regime of the Anthropocene.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T00:20:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d053a3682094f2d8c38e8a4af04709e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0585-5470
2720-0531
language deu
last_indexed 2024-03-08T00:20:11Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
record_format Article
series Studia Philosophiae Christianae
spelling doaj.art-2d053a3682094f2d8c38e8a4af04709e2024-02-16T11:04:16ZdeuWydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w WarszawieStudia Philosophiae Christianae0585-54702720-05312023-07-0159111113010.21697/spch.2023.59.A.06Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and NatureRichard St’ahel0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1665-5795Filozofický ústav Slovenskej Akadémie ViedThis paper is based on the concept of environmental political philosophy and from its perspective, it highlights the weaknesses and contradictions of contemporary, existing democracies. It aims to formulate an outline of the concept of environmental democracy, following the accounts of M. Bookchin, R. Morrison and H. Skolimowski, as well as international environmental law enshrined in United Nations documents and resolutions. It is based on the hypothesis that the preservation of a democratic political system in a situation of a collapsing planetary system (the Anthropocene) requires improving the foundations of democratic theory with the insights of the Earth system sciences, particularly of political ecology and critical environmentalism. Through philosophical analysis, explanation and interpretation, this paper explores an environmental democracy that would, on the one hand, preserve the basic constitutional principles of current democratic constitutional regimes, and, on the other hand, reconcile them with the current state of understanding in the Earth sciences concerning the vulnerability of the planetary system. In a sense, J. Habermas’s understanding of human rights characterizes the concept of environmental democracy as a realistic utopia. The author concludes by drawing up the imperative of sustainability, which he sees as a guiding organizing principle of institutions and public policies for the climatic, demographic and economic regime of the Anthropocene.https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/spch/article/view/13089environmental political philosophyindustrial democracyenvironmental democracyhuman rightsanthropocene
spellingShingle Richard St’ahel
Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature
Studia Philosophiae Christianae
environmental political philosophy
industrial democracy
environmental democracy
human rights
anthropocene
title Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature
title_full Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature
title_fullStr Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature
title_full_unstemmed Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature
title_short Industrial and Environmental Democracies as Models of a Politically Organized Relationship Between Society and Nature
title_sort industrial and environmental democracies as models of a politically organized relationship between society and nature
topic environmental political philosophy
industrial democracy
environmental democracy
human rights
anthropocene
url https://czasopisma.uksw.edu.pl/index.php/spch/article/view/13089
work_keys_str_mv AT richardstahel industrialandenvironmentaldemocraciesasmodelsofapoliticallyorganizedrelationshipbetweensocietyandnature