Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice
The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Pharmacy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/11/1/31 |
_version_ | 1797618656755056640 |
---|---|
author | Cecilia Farias-Ruiz Theresa Byrd Eric J. MacLaughlin Ronald G. Hall 2nd |
author_facet | Cecilia Farias-Ruiz Theresa Byrd Eric J. MacLaughlin Ronald G. Hall 2nd |
author_sort | Cecilia Farias-Ruiz |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we sought to identify themes regarding the barriers, motivators, and potential solutions associated with non-tenure-track faculty scholarship. Four focus group interviews were held via videoconference during July 2021, which consisted of non-tenure-track faculty within the TTUHSC Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy. Each focus group answered a standard script of questions that were evaluated for face validity over a 30–60 min session. Twenty-two non-tenure-track faculty members (47% response) participated in one of the four focus group interviews. The four common barriers were insufficient time, lack of acknowledgment, obscurity of scholarship expectations, and a lack of resources and support. Scholarship’s lasting impact on academia, students, and clinical practice was the one common motivator identified by the groups. The barriers identified were not unique to our faculty, despite the unique four-city structure of our program. Actions have continued to be taken to help address the barriers and potential solutions identified by the focus groups. In summary, our results echo that non-tenure-track faculty need more time and training to help them feel like they can meet institutional scholarship requirements. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-11T08:15:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2d08e6f1ee454b0c97a40d00bf95d93a |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2226-4787 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-11T08:15:37Z |
publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Pharmacy |
spelling | doaj.art-2d08e6f1ee454b0c97a40d00bf95d93a2023-11-16T22:44:02ZengMDPI AGPharmacy2226-47872023-02-011113110.3390/pharmacy11010031Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy PracticeCecilia Farias-Ruiz0Theresa Byrd1Eric J. MacLaughlin2Ronald G. Hall 2nd3Julia Jones Matthews School of Population and Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USAJulia Jones Matthews School of Population and Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USADepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX 79430, USADepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX 79430, USAThe Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we sought to identify themes regarding the barriers, motivators, and potential solutions associated with non-tenure-track faculty scholarship. Four focus group interviews were held via videoconference during July 2021, which consisted of non-tenure-track faculty within the TTUHSC Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy. Each focus group answered a standard script of questions that were evaluated for face validity over a 30–60 min session. Twenty-two non-tenure-track faculty members (47% response) participated in one of the four focus group interviews. The four common barriers were insufficient time, lack of acknowledgment, obscurity of scholarship expectations, and a lack of resources and support. Scholarship’s lasting impact on academia, students, and clinical practice was the one common motivator identified by the groups. The barriers identified were not unique to our faculty, despite the unique four-city structure of our program. Actions have continued to be taken to help address the barriers and potential solutions identified by the focus groups. In summary, our results echo that non-tenure-track faculty need more time and training to help them feel like they can meet institutional scholarship requirements.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/11/1/31facultyscholarshipresearchtimepharmacypharmacy practice |
spellingShingle | Cecilia Farias-Ruiz Theresa Byrd Eric J. MacLaughlin Ronald G. Hall 2nd Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice Pharmacy faculty scholarship research time pharmacy pharmacy practice |
title | Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice |
title_full | Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice |
title_short | Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice |
title_sort | evaluation of scholarship motivators and barriers for non tenure track faculty in a department of pharmacy practice |
topic | faculty scholarship research time pharmacy pharmacy practice |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/11/1/31 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ceciliafariasruiz evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice AT theresabyrd evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice AT ericjmaclaughlin evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice AT ronaldghall2nd evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice |