Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice

The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cecilia Farias-Ruiz, Theresa Byrd, Eric J. MacLaughlin, Ronald G. Hall 2nd
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
Series:Pharmacy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/11/1/31
_version_ 1797618656755056640
author Cecilia Farias-Ruiz
Theresa Byrd
Eric J. MacLaughlin
Ronald G. Hall 2nd
author_facet Cecilia Farias-Ruiz
Theresa Byrd
Eric J. MacLaughlin
Ronald G. Hall 2nd
author_sort Cecilia Farias-Ruiz
collection DOAJ
description The Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we sought to identify themes regarding the barriers, motivators, and potential solutions associated with non-tenure-track faculty scholarship. Four focus group interviews were held via videoconference during July 2021, which consisted of non-tenure-track faculty within the TTUHSC Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy. Each focus group answered a standard script of questions that were evaluated for face validity over a 30–60 min session. Twenty-two non-tenure-track faculty members (47% response) participated in one of the four focus group interviews. The four common barriers were insufficient time, lack of acknowledgment, obscurity of scholarship expectations, and a lack of resources and support. Scholarship’s lasting impact on academia, students, and clinical practice was the one common motivator identified by the groups. The barriers identified were not unique to our faculty, despite the unique four-city structure of our program. Actions have continued to be taken to help address the barriers and potential solutions identified by the focus groups. In summary, our results echo that non-tenure-track faculty need more time and training to help them feel like they can meet institutional scholarship requirements.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:15:37Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d08e6f1ee454b0c97a40d00bf95d93a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2226-4787
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:15:37Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Pharmacy
spelling doaj.art-2d08e6f1ee454b0c97a40d00bf95d93a2023-11-16T22:44:02ZengMDPI AGPharmacy2226-47872023-02-011113110.3390/pharmacy11010031Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy PracticeCecilia Farias-Ruiz0Theresa Byrd1Eric J. MacLaughlin2Ronald G. Hall 2nd3Julia Jones Matthews School of Population and Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USAJulia Jones Matthews School of Population and Public Health, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX 79430, USADepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX 79430, USADepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Amarillo, TX 79430, USAThe Accreditation Council for Pharmacy Education (ACPE) Standards 2016 set explicit expectations for faculty scholarship. However, many non-tenure-track faculty have struggled with the scholarship portion of the academic tripart mission of clinical practice, teaching, and scholarship. Therefore, we sought to identify themes regarding the barriers, motivators, and potential solutions associated with non-tenure-track faculty scholarship. Four focus group interviews were held via videoconference during July 2021, which consisted of non-tenure-track faculty within the TTUHSC Jerry H. Hodge School of Pharmacy. Each focus group answered a standard script of questions that were evaluated for face validity over a 30–60 min session. Twenty-two non-tenure-track faculty members (47% response) participated in one of the four focus group interviews. The four common barriers were insufficient time, lack of acknowledgment, obscurity of scholarship expectations, and a lack of resources and support. Scholarship’s lasting impact on academia, students, and clinical practice was the one common motivator identified by the groups. The barriers identified were not unique to our faculty, despite the unique four-city structure of our program. Actions have continued to be taken to help address the barriers and potential solutions identified by the focus groups. In summary, our results echo that non-tenure-track faculty need more time and training to help them feel like they can meet institutional scholarship requirements.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/11/1/31facultyscholarshipresearchtimepharmacypharmacy practice
spellingShingle Cecilia Farias-Ruiz
Theresa Byrd
Eric J. MacLaughlin
Ronald G. Hall 2nd
Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice
Pharmacy
faculty
scholarship
research
time
pharmacy
pharmacy practice
title Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice
title_full Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice
title_fullStr Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice
title_short Evaluation of Scholarship Motivators and Barriers for Non-Tenure-Track Faculty in a Department of Pharmacy Practice
title_sort evaluation of scholarship motivators and barriers for non tenure track faculty in a department of pharmacy practice
topic faculty
scholarship
research
time
pharmacy
pharmacy practice
url https://www.mdpi.com/2226-4787/11/1/31
work_keys_str_mv AT ceciliafariasruiz evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice
AT theresabyrd evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice
AT ericjmaclaughlin evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice
AT ronaldghall2nd evaluationofscholarshipmotivatorsandbarriersfornontenuretrackfacultyinadepartmentofpharmacypractice