Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping review
Abstract Objective: The purpose of this scoping review is two-fold: to assess the literature that quantitatively measures outcomes of mentorship programs designed to support research-focused junior faculty and to identify mentoring strategies that promote diversity within academic medicine mentori...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Cambridge University Press
2023-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122004745/type/journal_article |
_version_ | 1811156479842975744 |
---|---|
author | Joni S. Williams Rebekah J. Walker Kaylin M. Burgess L. Aubree Shay Susanne Schmidt Joel Tsevat Jennifer A. Campbell Aprill Z. Dawson Mukoso N. Ozieh Shane A. Phillips Leonard E. Egede |
author_facet | Joni S. Williams Rebekah J. Walker Kaylin M. Burgess L. Aubree Shay Susanne Schmidt Joel Tsevat Jennifer A. Campbell Aprill Z. Dawson Mukoso N. Ozieh Shane A. Phillips Leonard E. Egede |
author_sort | Joni S. Williams |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
Abstract
Objective:
The purpose of this scoping review is two-fold: to assess the literature that quantitatively measures outcomes of mentorship programs designed to support research-focused junior faculty and to identify mentoring strategies that promote diversity within academic medicine mentoring programs.
Methods:
Studies were identified by searching Medline using MESH terms for mentoring and academic medicine. Eligibility criteria included studies focused on junior faculty in research-focused positions, receiving mentorship, in an academic medical center in the USA, with outcomes collected to measure career success (career trajectory, career satisfaction, quality of life, research productivity, leadership positions). Data were abstracted using a standardized data collection form, and best practices were summarized.
Results:
Search terms resulted in 1,842 articles for title and abstract review, with 27 manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria. Two studies focused specifically on women, and four studies focused on junior faculty from racial/ethnic backgrounds underrepresented in medicine. From the initial search, few studies were designed to specifically increase diversity or capture outcomes relevant to promotion within academic medicine. Of those which did, most studies captured the impact on research productivity and career satisfaction. Traditional one-on-one mentorship, structured peer mentorship facilitated by a senior mentor, and peer mentorship in combination with one-on-one mentorship were found to be effective strategies to facilitate research productivity.
Conclusion:
Efforts are needed at the mentee, mentor, and institutional level to provide mentorship to diverse junior faculty on research competencies and career trajectory, create a sense of belonging, and connect junior faculty with institutional resources to support career success.
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:52:23Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2d0a683ead9a47c1a4e5451642a9b3f8 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2059-8661 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T04:52:23Z |
publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical and Translational Science |
spelling | doaj.art-2d0a683ead9a47c1a4e5451642a9b3f82023-03-09T12:31:13ZengCambridge University PressJournal of Clinical and Translational Science2059-86612023-01-01710.1017/cts.2022.474Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping reviewJoni S. Williams0Rebekah J. Walker1Kaylin M. Burgess2L. Aubree Shay3https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1756-4294Susanne Schmidt4https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7684-1648Joel Tsevat5https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0413-8969Jennifer A. Campbell6Aprill Z. Dawson7Mukoso N. Ozieh8Shane A. Phillips9Leonard E. Egede10https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1546-1515Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USACenter for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USAUTHealth School of Public Health in San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USADepartment of Population Health Sciences, Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USAReACH Center and Department of Medicine, Joe R. and Teresa Lozano Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USACenter for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Department of Medicine, Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, WI, USADepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Applied Health Sciences, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USADepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Center for Advancing Population Science, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA Abstract Objective: The purpose of this scoping review is two-fold: to assess the literature that quantitatively measures outcomes of mentorship programs designed to support research-focused junior faculty and to identify mentoring strategies that promote diversity within academic medicine mentoring programs. Methods: Studies were identified by searching Medline using MESH terms for mentoring and academic medicine. Eligibility criteria included studies focused on junior faculty in research-focused positions, receiving mentorship, in an academic medical center in the USA, with outcomes collected to measure career success (career trajectory, career satisfaction, quality of life, research productivity, leadership positions). Data were abstracted using a standardized data collection form, and best practices were summarized. Results: Search terms resulted in 1,842 articles for title and abstract review, with 27 manuscripts meeting inclusion criteria. Two studies focused specifically on women, and four studies focused on junior faculty from racial/ethnic backgrounds underrepresented in medicine. From the initial search, few studies were designed to specifically increase diversity or capture outcomes relevant to promotion within academic medicine. Of those which did, most studies captured the impact on research productivity and career satisfaction. Traditional one-on-one mentorship, structured peer mentorship facilitated by a senior mentor, and peer mentorship in combination with one-on-one mentorship were found to be effective strategies to facilitate research productivity. Conclusion: Efforts are needed at the mentee, mentor, and institutional level to provide mentorship to diverse junior faculty on research competencies and career trajectory, create a sense of belonging, and connect junior faculty with institutional resources to support career success. https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122004745/type/journal_articleMentoringdiversityjunior facultyclinical researchscoping review |
spellingShingle | Joni S. Williams Rebekah J. Walker Kaylin M. Burgess L. Aubree Shay Susanne Schmidt Joel Tsevat Jennifer A. Campbell Aprill Z. Dawson Mukoso N. Ozieh Shane A. Phillips Leonard E. Egede Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping review Journal of Clinical and Translational Science Mentoring diversity junior faculty clinical research scoping review |
title | Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping review |
title_full | Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping review |
title_fullStr | Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping review |
title_short | Mentoring strategies to support diversity in research-focused junior faculty: A scoping review |
title_sort | mentoring strategies to support diversity in research focused junior faculty a scoping review |
topic | Mentoring diversity junior faculty clinical research scoping review |
url | https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2059866122004745/type/journal_article |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joniswilliams mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT rebekahjwalker mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT kaylinmburgess mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT laubreeshay mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT susanneschmidt mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT joeltsevat mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT jenniferacampbell mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT aprillzdawson mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT mukosonozieh mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT shaneaphillips mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview AT leonardeegede mentoringstrategiestosupportdiversityinresearchfocusedjuniorfacultyascopingreview |