Three-Way ROCs for Forensic Decision Making
AbstractFirearm examiners use a comparison microscope to judge whether bullets or cartridge cases were fired by the same gun. Examiners can reach one of three possible conclusions: Identification (a match), Elimination (not a match), or Inconclusive. Numerous error rate studies report that firearm e...
Main Authors: | Nicholas Scurich, Richard S. John |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2023-12-01
|
Series: | Statistics and Public Policy |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/10.1080/2330443X.2023.2239306 |
Similar Items
-
Subtleties in Bayesian decision-theoretic analysis for forensic findings: Notes on recent discussion of the role of validation study data in rational decision making
by: Alex Biedermann
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Inconclusive decisions and error rates in forensic science
by: H. Swofford, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01) -
Firearms the Law and forensic ballistics /
by: Warlow, T. A. (Tom A.)
Published: (2005) -
Forensic traces in forensic and veterinary opinions in case of suspicion of poaching with firearms
by: Marian Flis, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01) -
Gunshot wounds : practical aspects of firearms, ballistics, and forensic techniques /
by: 424203 Dimaio, Vincent J. M.
Published: (1985)