Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations

<i>Background and objectives:</i> There is a lack of good quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic musculoskeletal pain, including chronic low back pain. High quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been calle...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter W. Gladwell, Fiona Cramp, Shea Palmer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/2/149
_version_ 1797478251319263232
author Peter W. Gladwell
Fiona Cramp
Shea Palmer
author_facet Peter W. Gladwell
Fiona Cramp
Shea Palmer
author_sort Peter W. Gladwell
collection DOAJ
description <i>Background and objectives:</i> There is a lack of good quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic musculoskeletal pain, including chronic low back pain. High quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been called for to establish effectiveness over and above placebo and some guidance has already been offered regarding the design of such trials. This article expands the discussion regarding the design of future TENS trials. There is qualitative evidence of the complexity of TENS as an intervention which should be considered in future TENS evaluations. This complexity includes multiple benefits reported by patients, depending on their chosen contexts of TENS use. The ideal content and delivery of support for patients to optimise TENS use also lacks consensus. There is no evidence that a TENS education package has been designed to support the complex set of behaviours and choices which experienced users suggest are required to optimise TENS benefits. Finally, clinical and research outcomes have not been contextualised and related to the specific strategies of use. <i>Conclusions:</i> We suggest that research is required to develop consensus about the content and delivery of training in TENS use for patients who live with pain, informed by the experience of patients, clinicians, and researchers. Once a consensus about the content of TENS training has been reached, there is then a need to develop a TENS training course (TTC) based on this content. An effective and acceptable TTC is needed to develop the knowledge and skills required to optimise TENS use, supporting patients to build confidence in using TENS in everyday life situations with the aim of reducing the impact of chronic pain on function and quality of life. Further research is required to extend the evidence base regarding appropriate, contextualised TENS patient-reported outcomes.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T21:29:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d10daea4a384844809020f2f60ca99f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1010-660X
1648-9144
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T21:29:17Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj.art-2d10daea4a384844809020f2f60ca99f2023-11-23T20:58:46ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X1648-91442022-01-0158214910.3390/medicina58020149Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation EvaluationsPeter W. Gladwell0Fiona Cramp1Shea Palmer2Pain Management Service, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB, UKFaculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol BS16 1QY, UKCentre for Care Excellence, Coventry University and University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust Richard Crossman Building, Jordan Well, Coventry CV1 5RW, UK<i>Background and objectives:</i> There is a lack of good quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for chronic musculoskeletal pain, including chronic low back pain. High quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have been called for to establish effectiveness over and above placebo and some guidance has already been offered regarding the design of such trials. This article expands the discussion regarding the design of future TENS trials. There is qualitative evidence of the complexity of TENS as an intervention which should be considered in future TENS evaluations. This complexity includes multiple benefits reported by patients, depending on their chosen contexts of TENS use. The ideal content and delivery of support for patients to optimise TENS use also lacks consensus. There is no evidence that a TENS education package has been designed to support the complex set of behaviours and choices which experienced users suggest are required to optimise TENS benefits. Finally, clinical and research outcomes have not been contextualised and related to the specific strategies of use. <i>Conclusions:</i> We suggest that research is required to develop consensus about the content and delivery of training in TENS use for patients who live with pain, informed by the experience of patients, clinicians, and researchers. Once a consensus about the content of TENS training has been reached, there is then a need to develop a TENS training course (TTC) based on this content. An effective and acceptable TTC is needed to develop the knowledge and skills required to optimise TENS use, supporting patients to build confidence in using TENS in everyday life situations with the aim of reducing the impact of chronic pain on function and quality of life. Further research is required to extend the evidence base regarding appropriate, contextualised TENS patient-reported outcomes.https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/2/149transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulationmusculoskeletal painlow back painpatient reported outcome measuresqualitative researchcomplex intervention
spellingShingle Peter W. Gladwell
Fiona Cramp
Shea Palmer
Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations
Medicina
transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
musculoskeletal pain
low back pain
patient reported outcome measures
qualitative research
complex intervention
title Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations
title_full Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations
title_fullStr Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations
title_full_unstemmed Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations
title_short Foundational Research Could Improve Future Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation Evaluations
title_sort foundational research could improve future transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation evaluations
topic transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation
musculoskeletal pain
low back pain
patient reported outcome measures
qualitative research
complex intervention
url https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/58/2/149
work_keys_str_mv AT peterwgladwell foundationalresearchcouldimprovefuturetranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationevaluations
AT fionacramp foundationalresearchcouldimprovefuturetranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationevaluations
AT sheapalmer foundationalresearchcouldimprovefuturetranscutaneouselectricalnervestimulationevaluations