Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study
(1) Background: Previous studies reported limited performance of arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output (CO) estimation (FloTrac/Vigileo system; CO-FloTrac) compared with the intermittent thermodilution technique (CO<sub>int</sub>). However, errors due to bolus maneuver and inte...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/20/6093 |
_version_ | 1797440797784670208 |
---|---|
author | Chahyun Oh Soomin Lee Pyeonghwa Oh Woosuk Chung Youngkwon Ko Seok-Hwa Yoon Yoon-Hee Kim Sung-Mi Ji Boohwi Hong |
author_facet | Chahyun Oh Soomin Lee Pyeonghwa Oh Woosuk Chung Youngkwon Ko Seok-Hwa Yoon Yoon-Hee Kim Sung-Mi Ji Boohwi Hong |
author_sort | Chahyun Oh |
collection | DOAJ |
description | (1) Background: Previous studies reported limited performance of arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output (CO) estimation (FloTrac/Vigileo system; CO-FloTrac) compared with the intermittent thermodilution technique (CO<sub>int</sub>). However, errors due to bolus maneuver and intermittent measurements of CO<sub>int</sub> could limit its use as a reference. The continuous thermodilution technique (CO<sub>cont</sub>) may relieve such limitations. (2) Methods: The performance of CO-FloTrac was retrospectively assessed using continuous recordings of intraoperative physiological data acquired from patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) surgery with CO monitoring using both CO-FloTrac and CO<sub>cont</sub>. Optimal time adjustments between the two measurements were determined based on R-squared values. (3) Results: A total of 134.2 h of data from 30 patients was included in the final analysis. The mean bias was –0.94 (95% CI, −1.35 to −0.52) L/min and the limits of agreements were −3.64 (95% CI, −4.44 to −3.08) L/min and 1.77 (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.57) L/min. The percentage error was 66.1% (95% CI, 52.4 to 85.8%). Depending on the time scale and the size of the exclusion zone, concordance rates ranged from 61.0% to 75.0%. (4) Conclusion: Despite the time adjustments, CO-FloTrac showed non-negligible overestimation, clinically unacceptable precision, and poor trending ability during OPCAB surgery. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:13:37Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2d1b0f6755354e6d8fe817e0e9afc7ed |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2077-0383 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-09T12:13:37Z |
publishDate | 2022-10-01 |
publisher | MDPI AG |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Clinical Medicine |
spelling | doaj.art-2d1b0f6755354e6d8fe817e0e9afc7ed2023-11-30T22:49:07ZengMDPI AGJournal of Clinical Medicine2077-03832022-10-011120609310.3390/jcm11206093Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort StudyChahyun Oh0Soomin Lee1Pyeonghwa Oh2Woosuk Chung3Youngkwon Ko4Seok-Hwa Yoon5Yoon-Hee Kim6Sung-Mi Ji7Boohwi Hong8Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan 31116, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dankook University Hospital, Cheonan 31116, KoreaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Daejeon 35015, Korea(1) Background: Previous studies reported limited performance of arterial pressure waveform-based cardiac output (CO) estimation (FloTrac/Vigileo system; CO-FloTrac) compared with the intermittent thermodilution technique (CO<sub>int</sub>). However, errors due to bolus maneuver and intermittent measurements of CO<sub>int</sub> could limit its use as a reference. The continuous thermodilution technique (CO<sub>cont</sub>) may relieve such limitations. (2) Methods: The performance of CO-FloTrac was retrospectively assessed using continuous recordings of intraoperative physiological data acquired from patients who underwent off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) surgery with CO monitoring using both CO-FloTrac and CO<sub>cont</sub>. Optimal time adjustments between the two measurements were determined based on R-squared values. (3) Results: A total of 134.2 h of data from 30 patients was included in the final analysis. The mean bias was –0.94 (95% CI, −1.35 to −0.52) L/min and the limits of agreements were −3.64 (95% CI, −4.44 to −3.08) L/min and 1.77 (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.57) L/min. The percentage error was 66.1% (95% CI, 52.4 to 85.8%). Depending on the time scale and the size of the exclusion zone, concordance rates ranged from 61.0% to 75.0%. (4) Conclusion: Despite the time adjustments, CO-FloTrac showed non-negligible overestimation, clinically unacceptable precision, and poor trending ability during OPCAB surgery.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/20/6093cardiac outputhemodynamic monitoringthermodilutioncoronary artery bypass graftarterial pressure waveform |
spellingShingle | Chahyun Oh Soomin Lee Pyeonghwa Oh Woosuk Chung Youngkwon Ko Seok-Hwa Yoon Yoon-Hee Kim Sung-Mi Ji Boohwi Hong Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study Journal of Clinical Medicine cardiac output hemodynamic monitoring thermodilution coronary artery bypass graft arterial pressure waveform |
title | Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Comparison between Fourth-Generation FloTrac/Vigileo System and Continuous Thermodilution Technique for Cardiac Output Estimation after Time Adjustment during Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | comparison between fourth generation flotrac vigileo system and continuous thermodilution technique for cardiac output estimation after time adjustment during off pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery a retrospective cohort study |
topic | cardiac output hemodynamic monitoring thermodilution coronary artery bypass graft arterial pressure waveform |
url | https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/20/6093 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chahyunoh comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT soominlee comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT pyeonghwaoh comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT woosukchung comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT youngkwonko comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT seokhwayoon comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT yoonheekim comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT sungmiji comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy AT boohwihong comparisonbetweenfourthgenerationflotracvigileosystemandcontinuousthermodilutiontechniqueforcardiacoutputestimationaftertimeadjustmentduringoffpumpcoronaryarterybypassgraftsurgeryaretrospectivecohortstudy |