Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators

Abstract Background Karyotype analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are commonly used for prenatal diagnosis, however they have many disadvantages. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Guanhua Qian, Liuyun Cai, Hong Yao, Xiaojing Dong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-11-01
Series:BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06052-z
_version_ 1797629874660179968
author Guanhua Qian
Liuyun Cai
Hong Yao
Xiaojing Dong
author_facet Guanhua Qian
Liuyun Cai
Hong Yao
Xiaojing Dong
author_sort Guanhua Qian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Karyotype analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are commonly used for prenatal diagnosis, however they have many disadvantages. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of CMA in the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal anomalies in southwest of China. Methods A total of 3336 samples of amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood from pregnant women with high-risk indicators at our center in southwest of China from June 2018 to January 2023 were included in the retrospective analysis. 3222 cases tested by CMA and karyotyping, 114 cases only tested by CMA. Results 3336 samples divided into 2911 cases with single and 425 cases with multiple high-risk indicators. The aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) of 2911 cases with single high-risk indicator were 4.43% (129/2911) and 2.44% (71/2911) respectively; the aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs of 425 cases with multiple high-risk indicators were 6.82% (29/425) and 2.12% (9/425) respectively. The rate of aneuploidy increased significantly with pregnancy age or NT value. The detection rate of aneuploidy on cases with AMA combined NT ≥ 2.5 mm was significantly higher than that in cases only with AMA (p < 0.001); the detection rate of aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs in cases with AMA combined NIPT high-risk were higher than that in cases only with AMA (p < 0.001, p < 0.05). Conclusions The combined application of CMA and karyotyping were recommended in prenatal diagnosis for providing a scientific and accurate genetic diagnosis and improving the quality of prenatal genetic counseling.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:59:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d374c6ac22b4c6bb6c241b1320fe07e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2393
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:59:56Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
spelling doaj.art-2d374c6ac22b4c6bb6c241b1320fe07e2023-11-12T12:32:59ZengBMCBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth1471-23932023-11-012311710.1186/s12884-023-06052-zChromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicatorsGuanhua Qian0Liuyun Cai1Hong Yao2Xiaojing Dong3Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityObstetrics and Gynecology Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical UniversityAbstract Background Karyotype analysis and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are commonly used for prenatal diagnosis, however they have many disadvantages. Chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) has the potential to overcome these disadvantages. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical value of CMA in the diagnosis of fetal chromosomal anomalies in southwest of China. Methods A total of 3336 samples of amniotic fluid or umbilical cord blood from pregnant women with high-risk indicators at our center in southwest of China from June 2018 to January 2023 were included in the retrospective analysis. 3222 cases tested by CMA and karyotyping, 114 cases only tested by CMA. Results 3336 samples divided into 2911 cases with single and 425 cases with multiple high-risk indicators. The aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) of 2911 cases with single high-risk indicator were 4.43% (129/2911) and 2.44% (71/2911) respectively; the aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs of 425 cases with multiple high-risk indicators were 6.82% (29/425) and 2.12% (9/425) respectively. The rate of aneuploidy increased significantly with pregnancy age or NT value. The detection rate of aneuploidy on cases with AMA combined NT ≥ 2.5 mm was significantly higher than that in cases only with AMA (p < 0.001); the detection rate of aneuploidy and pathogenic/likely pathogenic CNVs in cases with AMA combined NIPT high-risk were higher than that in cases only with AMA (p < 0.001, p < 0.05). Conclusions The combined application of CMA and karyotyping were recommended in prenatal diagnosis for providing a scientific and accurate genetic diagnosis and improving the quality of prenatal genetic counseling.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06052-zPrenatal diagnosisChromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)Copy number variation (CNV)Karyotype analysis
spellingShingle Guanhua Qian
Liuyun Cai
Hong Yao
Xiaojing Dong
Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Prenatal diagnosis
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)
Copy number variation (CNV)
Karyotype analysis
title Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators
title_full Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators
title_fullStr Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators
title_full_unstemmed Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators
title_short Chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high-risk indicators
title_sort chromosome microarray analysis combined with karyotype analysis is a powerful tool for the detection in pregnant women with high risk indicators
topic Prenatal diagnosis
Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA)
Copy number variation (CNV)
Karyotype analysis
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-023-06052-z
work_keys_str_mv AT guanhuaqian chromosomemicroarrayanalysiscombinedwithkaryotypeanalysisisapowerfultoolforthedetectioninpregnantwomenwithhighriskindicators
AT liuyuncai chromosomemicroarrayanalysiscombinedwithkaryotypeanalysisisapowerfultoolforthedetectioninpregnantwomenwithhighriskindicators
AT hongyao chromosomemicroarrayanalysiscombinedwithkaryotypeanalysisisapowerfultoolforthedetectioninpregnantwomenwithhighriskindicators
AT xiaojingdong chromosomemicroarrayanalysiscombinedwithkaryotypeanalysisisapowerfultoolforthedetectioninpregnantwomenwithhighriskindicators