How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective Study

Introduction: Blood is a scarce and life saving resource, however blood transfusion can be a source for transmitting life threatening infections if screening is not carried out properly. Aim: The objective of the present study was to assess the prevalence and trend of transfusion transmitted in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Apra Kalra, Parminder Kaur Gill, Gopal Dutt Uniya
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd. 2014-03-01
Series:National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2000/7645_E(_)_F(H)_Reformatted_PF1(PrH)_PFA(KH)_OLF.pdf
_version_ 1818153472112984064
author Apra Kalra
Parminder Kaur Gill
Gopal Dutt Uniya
author_facet Apra Kalra
Parminder Kaur Gill
Gopal Dutt Uniya
author_sort Apra Kalra
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Blood is a scarce and life saving resource, however blood transfusion can be a source for transmitting life threatening infections if screening is not carried out properly. Aim: The objective of the present study was to assess the prevalence and trend of transfusion transmitted infections (HIV, HBsAg, HCV and syphilis and malaria infections in the pretransfusion blood) among voluntary and replacement donors in the Department of transfusion Medicine in a multispecialty hospital of Mohali during the period from Jan 2008 to Dec 2012. Methods: A retrospective review of donors’ record covering the period from 2008 to 2012 was carried out. All samples were screened for HIV, HBsAg, HCV, Syphilis and Malaria. Results: Of the 45,337 samples studied, 4144 (9.1%) were voluntary donors and the remaining 41193 (90.8%) were replacement donors. The overall prevalence of HIV, HbsAg, HCV and syphilis were 0.44, 1.27, 0.23 and 0.28%, respectively. One blood donor tested revealed positivity for malarial parasite. Majority were replacement donors with male preponderance. In all the markers tested there was increased prevalence of TTI among the replacement donors as compared to voluntary donors. Conclusion: By implementing strict donor criteria and using sensitive screening tests, it may be possible to reduce the incidence of TTI in the Indian scenario.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T14:11:09Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d515890b78042958a40fd031fad8466
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2277-8551
2455-6882
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T14:11:09Z
publishDate 2014-03-01
publisher JCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.
record_format Article
series National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
spelling doaj.art-2d515890b78042958a40fd031fad84662022-12-22T01:03:26ZengJCDR Research and Publications Pvt. Ltd.National Journal of Laboratory Medicine2277-85512455-68822014-03-01311310.7860/NJLM/2014/7645:2000How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective StudyApra Kalra0 Parminder Kaur Gill1Gopal Dutt Uniya2Consultant, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India.Senior Resident, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India.Team leader, Fortis Hospital, Mohali, Punjab, India.Introduction: Blood is a scarce and life saving resource, however blood transfusion can be a source for transmitting life threatening infections if screening is not carried out properly. Aim: The objective of the present study was to assess the prevalence and trend of transfusion transmitted infections (HIV, HBsAg, HCV and syphilis and malaria infections in the pretransfusion blood) among voluntary and replacement donors in the Department of transfusion Medicine in a multispecialty hospital of Mohali during the period from Jan 2008 to Dec 2012. Methods: A retrospective review of donors’ record covering the period from 2008 to 2012 was carried out. All samples were screened for HIV, HBsAg, HCV, Syphilis and Malaria. Results: Of the 45,337 samples studied, 4144 (9.1%) were voluntary donors and the remaining 41193 (90.8%) were replacement donors. The overall prevalence of HIV, HbsAg, HCV and syphilis were 0.44, 1.27, 0.23 and 0.28%, respectively. One blood donor tested revealed positivity for malarial parasite. Majority were replacement donors with male preponderance. In all the markers tested there was increased prevalence of TTI among the replacement donors as compared to voluntary donors. Conclusion: By implementing strict donor criteria and using sensitive screening tests, it may be possible to reduce the incidence of TTI in the Indian scenario.http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2000/7645_E(_)_F(H)_Reformatted_PF1(PrH)_PFA(KH)_OLF.pdftransfusion transmitted infectionsnucleic acid testingblood donation
spellingShingle Apra Kalra
Parminder Kaur Gill
Gopal Dutt Uniya
How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective Study
National Journal of Laboratory Medicine
transfusion transmitted infections
nucleic acid testing
blood donation
title How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective Study
title_full How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective Study
title_fullStr How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective Study
title_short How Safe is Blood? A 5 Year Retrospective Study
title_sort how safe is blood a 5 year retrospective study
topic transfusion transmitted infections
nucleic acid testing
blood donation
url http://www.njlm.net/articles/PDF/2000/7645_E(_)_F(H)_Reformatted_PF1(PrH)_PFA(KH)_OLF.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT aprakalra howsafeisblooda5yearretrospectivestudy
AT parminderkaurgill howsafeisblooda5yearretrospectivestudy
AT gopalduttuniya howsafeisblooda5yearretrospectivestudy