THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II)
The relevance of the article, which consists of two parts, is that the various theories of rationality presented only in philosophical works are considered. Meanwhile, it should be noted that in recent decades in scientific works on jurisprudence there is a clear trend of borrowing such terms from p...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
2019-12-01
|
| Series: | RUDN Journal of Law |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/viewFile/21540/17131 |
| _version_ | 1818081451907743744 |
|---|---|
| author | Valeriy P. Ivanskiy Sergey I. Kovalev |
| author_facet | Valeriy P. Ivanskiy Sergey I. Kovalev |
| author_sort | Valeriy P. Ivanskiy |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The relevance of the article, which consists of two parts, is that the various theories of rationality presented only in philosophical works are considered. Meanwhile, it should be noted that in recent decades in scientific works on jurisprudence there is a clear trend of borrowing such terms from philosophy as “classical”, “non-classical” or “post-non-classical” science in the description of a concept of law. Nevertheless, in legal studies there is still no concept of rationality, the criteria for its classification, allowing to describe the diversity of manifestations of legal reality. The purpose of the study is: 1) to find new non-classical foundations for the development of legal knowledge; 2) to substantiate the point of view that the category of “scientific rationality” and its typology used in philosophy, it is necessary to introduce into scientific use of legal science, which will push the boundaries of knowledge of legal reality; 3) to describe the features of understanding of the term "scientific rationality" in law in the context of its classification into the following two groups: classical and neoclassical (post-classical), as well as non-classical and post-classical. In the process of studying the philosophy of rationality in legal studies used a diverse set of methodological tools : 1) General philosophical methods (dialectical and idealistic); 2) General scientific methods - analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, analogy, comparison; 3) and private (special) - logical, comparative-legal, formal-legal, normative-dogmatic; 4) method of interpretation, including the method of problem-theoretical reconstruction. The main results of achieving the goal of the study were proposals on: 1) introduction of the concept of “types and models of legal rationality” into the scientific circulation of jurisprudence; 2) classification of legal rationality into classical and non - classical types and corresponding models-neoclassical (post-classical) and post-non-classical. It should be noted that the post-classical and post-non-classical styles of legal thinking are evolved versions, respectively, of the classical and non-classical types of legal rationality. The basis for the classification of types of scientific rationality in legal science was the anthropological factor-consciousness homo juridicus and methodological tools with which legal consciousness is known. The novelty of the study is that the above classification of epistemological paradigms allows us to look at the law as a multilevel reality, which is simultaneously inherent in the two mechanisms of its Constitution - external and internal. Moreover, the presented criteria-based classification of legal rationality is the basis for the development of legal knowledge. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-10T19:06:25Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2d5720dc5c7047fba6da4b735175d201 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2313-2337 2408-9001 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-10T19:06:25Z |
| publishDate | 2019-12-01 |
| publisher | Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | RUDN Journal of Law |
| spelling | doaj.art-2d5720dc5c7047fba6da4b735175d2012022-12-22T01:36:53ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of Law2313-23372408-90012019-12-0123218419910.22363/2313-2337-2019-23-2-184-19917802THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II)Valeriy P. Ivanskiy0Sergey I. Kovalev1Peoples' Friendship University of RussiaPeoples' Friendship University of RussiaThe relevance of the article, which consists of two parts, is that the various theories of rationality presented only in philosophical works are considered. Meanwhile, it should be noted that in recent decades in scientific works on jurisprudence there is a clear trend of borrowing such terms from philosophy as “classical”, “non-classical” or “post-non-classical” science in the description of a concept of law. Nevertheless, in legal studies there is still no concept of rationality, the criteria for its classification, allowing to describe the diversity of manifestations of legal reality. The purpose of the study is: 1) to find new non-classical foundations for the development of legal knowledge; 2) to substantiate the point of view that the category of “scientific rationality” and its typology used in philosophy, it is necessary to introduce into scientific use of legal science, which will push the boundaries of knowledge of legal reality; 3) to describe the features of understanding of the term "scientific rationality" in law in the context of its classification into the following two groups: classical and neoclassical (post-classical), as well as non-classical and post-classical. In the process of studying the philosophy of rationality in legal studies used a diverse set of methodological tools : 1) General philosophical methods (dialectical and idealistic); 2) General scientific methods - analysis and synthesis, deduction and induction, analogy, comparison; 3) and private (special) - logical, comparative-legal, formal-legal, normative-dogmatic; 4) method of interpretation, including the method of problem-theoretical reconstruction. The main results of achieving the goal of the study were proposals on: 1) introduction of the concept of “types and models of legal rationality” into the scientific circulation of jurisprudence; 2) classification of legal rationality into classical and non - classical types and corresponding models-neoclassical (post-classical) and post-non-classical. It should be noted that the post-classical and post-non-classical styles of legal thinking are evolved versions, respectively, of the classical and non-classical types of legal rationality. The basis for the classification of types of scientific rationality in legal science was the anthropological factor-consciousness homo juridicus and methodological tools with which legal consciousness is known. The novelty of the study is that the above classification of epistemological paradigms allows us to look at the law as a multilevel reality, which is simultaneously inherent in the two mechanisms of its Constitution - external and internal. Moreover, the presented criteria-based classification of legal rationality is the basis for the development of legal knowledge.http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/viewFile/21540/17131legal consciousnesslegal understandingphilosophy of rationalitylegal realitysubject of lawlaw-makingmethodologyclassicalnonclassical and post-non-classical paradigmscrisis |
| spellingShingle | Valeriy P. Ivanskiy Sergey I. Kovalev THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II) RUDN Journal of Law legal consciousness legal understanding philosophy of rationality legal reality subject of law law-making methodology classical nonclassical and post-non-classical paradigms crisis |
| title | THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II) |
| title_full | THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II) |
| title_fullStr | THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II) |
| title_full_unstemmed | THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II) |
| title_short | THE ROLE OF RATIONALITY PHILOSOPHY IN LEGAL STUDIES (PART II) |
| title_sort | role of rationality philosophy in legal studies part ii |
| topic | legal consciousness legal understanding philosophy of rationality legal reality subject of law law-making methodology classical nonclassical and post-non-classical paradigms crisis |
| url | http://journals.rudn.ru/law/article/viewFile/21540/17131 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT valeriypivanskiy theroleofrationalityphilosophyinlegalstudiespartii AT sergeyikovalev theroleofrationalityphilosophyinlegalstudiespartii AT valeriypivanskiy roleofrationalityphilosophyinlegalstudiespartii AT sergeyikovalev roleofrationalityphilosophyinlegalstudiespartii |