Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method

In this research, inverted bulk heterojunction organic solar cells (BHJ OSC) with poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl): (6,6)-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl (P3HT:PCBM) as the active layer were fabricated by a sol-gel spin coating method using flexible PET and non-flexible glass as substrates. The power...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohammad-Reza Zamani-Meymian, Saeb Sheikholeslami, Milad Fallah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-07-01
Series:Surfaces
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9637/3/3/23
_version_ 1797562912081969152
author Mohammad-Reza Zamani-Meymian
Saeb Sheikholeslami
Milad Fallah
author_facet Mohammad-Reza Zamani-Meymian
Saeb Sheikholeslami
Milad Fallah
author_sort Mohammad-Reza Zamani-Meymian
collection DOAJ
description In this research, inverted bulk heterojunction organic solar cells (BHJ OSC) with poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl): (6,6)-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl (P3HT:PCBM) as the active layer were fabricated by a sol-gel spin coating method using flexible PET and non-flexible glass as substrates. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) and the stability of the cells were investigated. According to the results, the non-flexible device showed higher short circuit current (J<sub>sc</sub>) as well as open-circuit voltage (V<sub>oc</sub>) as compared to the flexible one so that 2.52% and 0.67% PCE for non-flexible and flexible cells were obtained, respectively. From the stability point of view, the non-flexible device maintained 51% of its initial efficiency after six weeks in a dark atmosphere, while it was about 19% for the flexible cell after four weeks. The most important reason for the higher PCE with the higher stability in the non-flexible cell can be attributed to its higher shunt resistance (R<sub>sh</sub>) and better interlayer connections at the electron collector side.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T18:35:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d58d76985ba4fb7876bee0bc8756688
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2571-9637
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T18:35:20Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Surfaces
spelling doaj.art-2d58d76985ba4fb7876bee0bc87566882023-11-20T06:15:14ZengMDPI AGSurfaces2571-96372020-07-013331932710.3390/surfaces3030023Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating MethodMohammad-Reza Zamani-Meymian0Saeb Sheikholeslami1Milad Fallah2School of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, IranSchool of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, IranSchool of Physics, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran 1684613114, IranIn this research, inverted bulk heterojunction organic solar cells (BHJ OSC) with poly(3-hexylthiophene-2,5-diyl): (6,6)-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl (P3HT:PCBM) as the active layer were fabricated by a sol-gel spin coating method using flexible PET and non-flexible glass as substrates. The power conversion efficiency (PCE) and the stability of the cells were investigated. According to the results, the non-flexible device showed higher short circuit current (J<sub>sc</sub>) as well as open-circuit voltage (V<sub>oc</sub>) as compared to the flexible one so that 2.52% and 0.67% PCE for non-flexible and flexible cells were obtained, respectively. From the stability point of view, the non-flexible device maintained 51% of its initial efficiency after six weeks in a dark atmosphere, while it was about 19% for the flexible cell after four weeks. The most important reason for the higher PCE with the higher stability in the non-flexible cell can be attributed to its higher shunt resistance (R<sub>sh</sub>) and better interlayer connections at the electron collector side.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9637/3/3/23stabilityPCEOSCinverted flexible structureZnO
spellingShingle Mohammad-Reza Zamani-Meymian
Saeb Sheikholeslami
Milad Fallah
Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method
Surfaces
stability
PCE
OSC
inverted flexible structure
ZnO
title Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method
title_full Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method
title_fullStr Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method
title_full_unstemmed Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method
title_short Stability of Non-Flexible vs. Flexible Inverted Bulk-Heterojunction Organic Solar Cells with ZnO as Electron Transport Layer Prepared by a Sol-Gel Spin Coating Method
title_sort stability of non flexible vs flexible inverted bulk heterojunction organic solar cells with zno as electron transport layer prepared by a sol gel spin coating method
topic stability
PCE
OSC
inverted flexible structure
ZnO
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9637/3/3/23
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadrezazamanimeymian stabilityofnonflexiblevsflexibleinvertedbulkheterojunctionorganicsolarcellswithznoaselectrontransportlayerpreparedbyasolgelspincoatingmethod
AT saebsheikholeslami stabilityofnonflexiblevsflexibleinvertedbulkheterojunctionorganicsolarcellswithznoaselectrontransportlayerpreparedbyasolgelspincoatingmethod
AT miladfallah stabilityofnonflexiblevsflexibleinvertedbulkheterojunctionorganicsolarcellswithznoaselectrontransportlayerpreparedbyasolgelspincoatingmethod