Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.

<h4>Objectives</h4>To retrospectively validate the new Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS).<h4>Methods</h4>This study retrospectively collected the information of 619 patients (371 cases with non-hematologic malignancies, 248 cases with hematologic malignancies) who suspected o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manzhi Wang, Haiming Kou, Jun Deng, Huafang Wang, Tao Guo, Heng Mei, Yu Hu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2015-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129170
_version_ 1818589473632419840
author Manzhi Wang
Haiming Kou
Jun Deng
Huafang Wang
Tao Guo
Heng Mei
Yu Hu
author_facet Manzhi Wang
Haiming Kou
Jun Deng
Huafang Wang
Tao Guo
Heng Mei
Yu Hu
author_sort Manzhi Wang
collection DOAJ
description <h4>Objectives</h4>To retrospectively validate the new Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS).<h4>Methods</h4>This study retrospectively collected the information of 619 patients (371 cases with non-hematologic malignancies, 248 cases with hematologic malignancies) who suspected of DIC in Wuhan Union Hospital during 2013-4 to 2014-6. We validated CDSS by comparing it with three leading scoring systems, from International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) and Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW), and evaluated its prognostic value by 28 days mortality, APACHE II and SOFA score.<h4>Results</h4>In non-hematologic malignancies, CDSS was more specific than JAAM (72.55% vs. 50.49%, p<0.05) and more sensitive than ISTH (77.07% vs. 62.03%, p<0.05). In hematologic malignancies, the area under the ROC curve of CDSS was larger than ISTH and JMHW (0.933 vs. 0.889, p<0.01 with ISTH, 0.944 vs. 0.845, p<0.01 with JMHW). In addition, the 28-day mortality rate, SOFA scores, APACHE II scores of DIC patients diagnosed by CDSS were significantly greater than non-DIC (P <0.05).<h4>Conclusions</h4>We are the first group to propose CDSS. It emphasized the values of the clinical manifestations, the rapidly declining platelet count, APTT in the diagnosis of DIC and used D-dimer as the fibrin-related maker. DIC with hematological malignancies was treated as a special part. In this study we can see that CDSS displayed an acceptable property for the diagnosis of DIC with appropriate sensitivity and specificity, and also had a good prognostic value for DIC patients.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T09:41:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d74045b14924220ae1cffd01c879a24
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T09:41:13Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2d74045b14924220ae1cffd01c879a242022-12-21T22:36:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032015-01-01106e012917010.1371/journal.pone.0129170Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.Manzhi WangHaiming KouJun DengHuafang WangTao GuoHeng MeiYu Hu<h4>Objectives</h4>To retrospectively validate the new Chinese DIC scoring system (CDSS).<h4>Methods</h4>This study retrospectively collected the information of 619 patients (371 cases with non-hematologic malignancies, 248 cases with hematologic malignancies) who suspected of DIC in Wuhan Union Hospital during 2013-4 to 2014-6. We validated CDSS by comparing it with three leading scoring systems, from International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH), Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) and Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (JMHW), and evaluated its prognostic value by 28 days mortality, APACHE II and SOFA score.<h4>Results</h4>In non-hematologic malignancies, CDSS was more specific than JAAM (72.55% vs. 50.49%, p<0.05) and more sensitive than ISTH (77.07% vs. 62.03%, p<0.05). In hematologic malignancies, the area under the ROC curve of CDSS was larger than ISTH and JMHW (0.933 vs. 0.889, p<0.01 with ISTH, 0.944 vs. 0.845, p<0.01 with JMHW). In addition, the 28-day mortality rate, SOFA scores, APACHE II scores of DIC patients diagnosed by CDSS were significantly greater than non-DIC (P <0.05).<h4>Conclusions</h4>We are the first group to propose CDSS. It emphasized the values of the clinical manifestations, the rapidly declining platelet count, APTT in the diagnosis of DIC and used D-dimer as the fibrin-related maker. DIC with hematological malignancies was treated as a special part. In this study we can see that CDSS displayed an acceptable property for the diagnosis of DIC with appropriate sensitivity and specificity, and also had a good prognostic value for DIC patients.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129170
spellingShingle Manzhi Wang
Haiming Kou
Jun Deng
Huafang Wang
Tao Guo
Heng Mei
Yu Hu
Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
PLoS ONE
title Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
title_full Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
title_fullStr Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
title_full_unstemmed Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
title_short Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.
title_sort retrospective evaluation of new chinese diagnostic scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129170
work_keys_str_mv AT manzhiwang retrospectiveevaluationofnewchinesediagnosticscoringsystemfordisseminatedintravascularcoagulation
AT haimingkou retrospectiveevaluationofnewchinesediagnosticscoringsystemfordisseminatedintravascularcoagulation
AT jundeng retrospectiveevaluationofnewchinesediagnosticscoringsystemfordisseminatedintravascularcoagulation
AT huafangwang retrospectiveevaluationofnewchinesediagnosticscoringsystemfordisseminatedintravascularcoagulation
AT taoguo retrospectiveevaluationofnewchinesediagnosticscoringsystemfordisseminatedintravascularcoagulation
AT hengmei retrospectiveevaluationofnewchinesediagnosticscoringsystemfordisseminatedintravascularcoagulation
AT yuhu retrospectiveevaluationofnewchinesediagnosticscoringsystemfordisseminatedintravascularcoagulation