Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal Realism

Previous legal provisions cannot predict and regulate all possible future situations, and laws are composed of words that are open-textured, meaning that they are always susceptible to different interpretations. This has made the role of judges crucial in determining the content of legal rules. How...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alireza Dabirnia, Adel Sheibani
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: University of Qom 2023-12-01
Series:پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب
Subjects:
Online Access:https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2410_358def344bf9c3f0c629e5878980b08f.pdf
_version_ 1797233031407206400
author Alireza Dabirnia
Adel Sheibani
author_facet Alireza Dabirnia
Adel Sheibani
author_sort Alireza Dabirnia
collection DOAJ
description Previous legal provisions cannot predict and regulate all possible future situations, and laws are composed of words that are open-textured, meaning that they are always susceptible to different interpretations. This has made the role of judges crucial in determining the content of legal rules. How is this role assessed in the fabrics of the Iranian legal system? Furthermore, what is the position of judges in lawmaking or, more precisely, what is their role in judicial legislation, and how does this position relate to the principles of public law and considerations related to the separation of powers? This descriptive-analytical research attempts to examine the conceptual framework of judicial legislation in light of the theory of "legal realism" and analyze the legitimate boundaries of judges' discretion in the production of legal rules from the perspective of public law. This analysis requires, on the one hand, the clarification of the relationship between jurisprudence and adjudication and legislation, and on the other hand, the evaluation of the relationship between the Iranian legal system and one of the modern schools of legal philosophy, namely the school of "legal realism." According to the research findings, historically, the "Mujtahid Judge" has been the authority for declaring and applying legal rules, which creates similarities between the role of judges in legal theory and the role of judges in the school of "legal realism," although currently the substitution of individual ijtihad by the will of representatives in the legislative branch has introduced a new formulation in the fundamental principles of the legal system.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T16:09:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d83f4d1703f4730b63aeb02e400ce55
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2476-4213
2476-4221
language fas
last_indexed 2024-04-24T16:09:42Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher University of Qom
record_format Article
series پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب
spelling doaj.art-2d83f4d1703f4730b63aeb02e400ce552024-03-31T19:13:15ZfasUniversity of Qomپژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب2476-42132476-42212023-12-01104254810.22091/csiw.2023.8449.23042410Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal RealismAlireza Dabirnia0Adel Sheibani1Associate Professor, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.PhD Student in Public Law, Department of Public Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom.Previous legal provisions cannot predict and regulate all possible future situations, and laws are composed of words that are open-textured, meaning that they are always susceptible to different interpretations. This has made the role of judges crucial in determining the content of legal rules. How is this role assessed in the fabrics of the Iranian legal system? Furthermore, what is the position of judges in lawmaking or, more precisely, what is their role in judicial legislation, and how does this position relate to the principles of public law and considerations related to the separation of powers? This descriptive-analytical research attempts to examine the conceptual framework of judicial legislation in light of the theory of "legal realism" and analyze the legitimate boundaries of judges' discretion in the production of legal rules from the perspective of public law. This analysis requires, on the one hand, the clarification of the relationship between jurisprudence and adjudication and legislation, and on the other hand, the evaluation of the relationship between the Iranian legal system and one of the modern schools of legal philosophy, namely the school of "legal realism." According to the research findings, historically, the "Mujtahid Judge" has been the authority for declaring and applying legal rules, which creates similarities between the role of judges in legal theory and the role of judges in the school of "legal realism," although currently the substitution of individual ijtihad by the will of representatives in the legislative branch has introduced a new formulation in the fundamental principles of the legal system.https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2410_358def344bf9c3f0c629e5878980b08f.pdflegal realismlegislationadjudicationjudicial legislationseparation of powers
spellingShingle Alireza Dabirnia
Adel Sheibani
Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal Realism
پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب
legal realism
legislation
adjudication
judicial legislation
separation of powers
title Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal Realism
title_full Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal Realism
title_fullStr Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal Realism
title_full_unstemmed Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal Realism
title_short Judicial Legislation: Examining the Relationship between the Iranian Legal System and the School of Legal Realism
title_sort judicial legislation examining the relationship between the iranian legal system and the school of legal realism
topic legal realism
legislation
adjudication
judicial legislation
separation of powers
url https://csiw.qom.ac.ir/article_2410_358def344bf9c3f0c629e5878980b08f.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT alirezadabirnia judiciallegislationexaminingtherelationshipbetweentheiranianlegalsystemandtheschooloflegalrealism
AT adelsheibani judiciallegislationexaminingtherelationshipbetweentheiranianlegalsystemandtheschooloflegalrealism