The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of endoscopes after a conventional curettage adenoidectomy for detecting any residual adenoid tissue and to determine whether removing any residual, if present, affects the recurrence or not. Patients and methods Fifty patients...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2017-02-01
|
Series: | The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/1012-5574.199417 |
_version_ | 1797204376751702016 |
---|---|
author | Mohamed A. Abdelhamid Hazem M. Dewidar Ahmad M. Nassar Ahmad M. Eltelety |
author_facet | Mohamed A. Abdelhamid Hazem M. Dewidar Ahmad M. Nassar Ahmad M. Eltelety |
author_sort | Mohamed A. Abdelhamid |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of endoscopes after a conventional curettage adenoidectomy for detecting any residual adenoid tissue and to determine whether removing any residual, if present, affects the recurrence or not. Patients and methods Fifty patients were divided randomly into two equal groups. Group A underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy, followed by an endoscopic examination of the nasopharynx to detect and remove any residual adenoid tissue. Group B underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy only. Both groups were followed up for recurrence of symptomatic adenoid at fixed follow-up intervals at 10 days, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results There was a significant difference in the rate of adenoid recurrence between both groups 6 months postoperatively. Two (8%) patients in group A and nine (36%) patients in group B developed recurrence. The P value was statistically significant at 0.04. Conclusion Endoscopic examination after a conventional adenoidectomy is a safe and essential step for complete removal of the adenoid, thus reducing the recurrence rate. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:34:15Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2d9e171d734d465a9424811c56a482fe |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1012-5574 2090-8539 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-24T08:34:15Z |
publishDate | 2017-02-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology |
spelling | doaj.art-2d9e171d734d465a9424811c56a482fe2024-04-16T17:56:21ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology1012-55742090-85392017-02-01331243010.4103/1012-5574.199417The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomyMohamed A. Abdelhamid0Hazem M. Dewidar1Ahmad M. Nassar2Ahmad M. Eltelety3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of endoscopes after a conventional curettage adenoidectomy for detecting any residual adenoid tissue and to determine whether removing any residual, if present, affects the recurrence or not. Patients and methods Fifty patients were divided randomly into two equal groups. Group A underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy, followed by an endoscopic examination of the nasopharynx to detect and remove any residual adenoid tissue. Group B underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy only. Both groups were followed up for recurrence of symptomatic adenoid at fixed follow-up intervals at 10 days, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results There was a significant difference in the rate of adenoid recurrence between both groups 6 months postoperatively. Two (8%) patients in group A and nine (36%) patients in group B developed recurrence. The P value was statistically significant at 0.04. Conclusion Endoscopic examination after a conventional adenoidectomy is a safe and essential step for complete removal of the adenoid, thus reducing the recurrence rate.http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/1012-5574.199417adenoidadenoid recurrenceendoscopic examination |
spellingShingle | Mohamed A. Abdelhamid Hazem M. Dewidar Ahmad M. Nassar Ahmad M. Eltelety The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology adenoid adenoid recurrence endoscopic examination |
title | The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy |
title_full | The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy |
title_fullStr | The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy |
title_short | The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy |
title_sort | value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy |
topic | adenoid adenoid recurrence endoscopic examination |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/1012-5574.199417 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohamedaabdelhamid thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy AT hazemmdewidar thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy AT ahmadmnassar thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy AT ahmadmeltelety thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy AT mohamedaabdelhamid valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy AT hazemmdewidar valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy AT ahmadmnassar valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy AT ahmadmeltelety valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy |