The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy

Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of endoscopes after a conventional curettage adenoidectomy for detecting any residual adenoid tissue and to determine whether removing any residual, if present, affects the recurrence or not. Patients and methods Fifty patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mohamed A. Abdelhamid, Hazem M. Dewidar, Ahmad M. Nassar, Ahmad M. Eltelety
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-02-01
Series:The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/1012-5574.199417
_version_ 1797204376751702016
author Mohamed A. Abdelhamid
Hazem M. Dewidar
Ahmad M. Nassar
Ahmad M. Eltelety
author_facet Mohamed A. Abdelhamid
Hazem M. Dewidar
Ahmad M. Nassar
Ahmad M. Eltelety
author_sort Mohamed A. Abdelhamid
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of endoscopes after a conventional curettage adenoidectomy for detecting any residual adenoid tissue and to determine whether removing any residual, if present, affects the recurrence or not. Patients and methods Fifty patients were divided randomly into two equal groups. Group A underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy, followed by an endoscopic examination of the nasopharynx to detect and remove any residual adenoid tissue. Group B underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy only. Both groups were followed up for recurrence of symptomatic adenoid at fixed follow-up intervals at 10 days, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results There was a significant difference in the rate of adenoid recurrence between both groups 6 months postoperatively. Two (8%) patients in group A and nine (36%) patients in group B developed recurrence. The P value was statistically significant at 0.04. Conclusion Endoscopic examination after a conventional adenoidectomy is a safe and essential step for complete removal of the adenoid, thus reducing the recurrence rate.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T08:34:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2d9e171d734d465a9424811c56a482fe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1012-5574
2090-8539
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T08:34:15Z
publishDate 2017-02-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
spelling doaj.art-2d9e171d734d465a9424811c56a482fe2024-04-16T17:56:21ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology1012-55742090-85392017-02-01331243010.4103/1012-5574.199417The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomyMohamed A. Abdelhamid0Hazem M. Dewidar1Ahmad M. Nassar2Ahmad M. Eltelety3Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo UniversityAbstract Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of the use of endoscopes after a conventional curettage adenoidectomy for detecting any residual adenoid tissue and to determine whether removing any residual, if present, affects the recurrence or not. Patients and methods Fifty patients were divided randomly into two equal groups. Group A underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy, followed by an endoscopic examination of the nasopharynx to detect and remove any residual adenoid tissue. Group B underwent a conventional curettage adenoidectomy only. Both groups were followed up for recurrence of symptomatic adenoid at fixed follow-up intervals at 10 days, 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Results There was a significant difference in the rate of adenoid recurrence between both groups 6 months postoperatively. Two (8%) patients in group A and nine (36%) patients in group B developed recurrence. The P value was statistically significant at 0.04. Conclusion Endoscopic examination after a conventional adenoidectomy is a safe and essential step for complete removal of the adenoid, thus reducing the recurrence rate.http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/1012-5574.199417adenoidadenoid recurrenceendoscopic examination
spellingShingle Mohamed A. Abdelhamid
Hazem M. Dewidar
Ahmad M. Nassar
Ahmad M. Eltelety
The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
adenoid
adenoid recurrence
endoscopic examination
title The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
title_full The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
title_fullStr The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
title_full_unstemmed The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
title_short The value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
title_sort value of endoscopic examination at the end of conventional adenoidectomy
topic adenoid
adenoid recurrence
endoscopic examination
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.4103/1012-5574.199417
work_keys_str_mv AT mohamedaabdelhamid thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy
AT hazemmdewidar thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy
AT ahmadmnassar thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy
AT ahmadmeltelety thevalueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy
AT mohamedaabdelhamid valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy
AT hazemmdewidar valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy
AT ahmadmnassar valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy
AT ahmadmeltelety valueofendoscopicexaminationattheendofconventionaladenoidectomy