Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.

Switching inhalation devices is a reasonable option if problems with control, adherence, or inhalation technique occur in patients with asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA). However, evidence to determine the extent to which the carefully monitored period pe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rieko Kondo, Shotaro Maeda, Akira Kikuchi, Hiromichi Kiyono, Tohru Sato
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276001
_version_ 1811340282000572416
author Rieko Kondo
Shotaro Maeda
Akira Kikuchi
Hiromichi Kiyono
Tohru Sato
author_facet Rieko Kondo
Shotaro Maeda
Akira Kikuchi
Hiromichi Kiyono
Tohru Sato
author_sort Rieko Kondo
collection DOAJ
description Switching inhalation devices is a reasonable option if problems with control, adherence, or inhalation technique occur in patients with asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA). However, evidence to determine the extent to which the carefully monitored period persists after switching is insufficient. In this study, we aimed to investigate the duration of the carefully monitored period after switching to another ICS/LABA. This retrospective study used claims data from Japanese health insurance associations from May 2014 to April 2019. A total of 1,951 patients who switched to another ICS/LABA during the study period were selected for analysis. The relative risk of the first exacerbation after switching was calculated for each four-week interval after the switch compared with that before the switch in a self-controlled case series design. We further assessed patient background associated with exacerbations during the follow-up period. In the primary analysis, the risk of asthma exacerbation compared to the control period was derived from a conditional logistic regression model, which showed a significant decrease immediately after the switch (1 to 4 weeks, Odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.54). Subsequently, the risk increased again and was not significantly different from the control period until week 32 (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29-1.04). In a sensitivity analysis among patients with a history of exacerbations, up to week 20 was the period of no continuous risk reduction (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41-1.70). In the secondary analysis, chronic rhinosinusitis, sleep disorders, and a history of asthma exacerbation were significantly associated with asthma exacerbation. The incidence of exacerbation remained high for approximately 4 to 7 months after patients with asthma switched to another ICS/LABA. Therefore, these patients should be carefully monitored for at least 4 to 7 months and should be re-assessed at an earlier point in time, if necessary.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T18:39:35Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2da939cbc9f94a4c886d47f00e9599b7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T18:39:35Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2da939cbc9f94a4c886d47f00e9599b72022-12-22T02:34:46ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011710e027600110.1371/journal.pone.0276001Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.Rieko KondoShotaro MaedaAkira KikuchiHiromichi KiyonoTohru SatoSwitching inhalation devices is a reasonable option if problems with control, adherence, or inhalation technique occur in patients with asthma treated with inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting β2 agonist (LABA). However, evidence to determine the extent to which the carefully monitored period persists after switching is insufficient. In this study, we aimed to investigate the duration of the carefully monitored period after switching to another ICS/LABA. This retrospective study used claims data from Japanese health insurance associations from May 2014 to April 2019. A total of 1,951 patients who switched to another ICS/LABA during the study period were selected for analysis. The relative risk of the first exacerbation after switching was calculated for each four-week interval after the switch compared with that before the switch in a self-controlled case series design. We further assessed patient background associated with exacerbations during the follow-up period. In the primary analysis, the risk of asthma exacerbation compared to the control period was derived from a conditional logistic regression model, which showed a significant decrease immediately after the switch (1 to 4 weeks, Odds ratio [OR] 0.37, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.54). Subsequently, the risk increased again and was not significantly different from the control period until week 32 (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.29-1.04). In a sensitivity analysis among patients with a history of exacerbations, up to week 20 was the period of no continuous risk reduction (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.41-1.70). In the secondary analysis, chronic rhinosinusitis, sleep disorders, and a history of asthma exacerbation were significantly associated with asthma exacerbation. The incidence of exacerbation remained high for approximately 4 to 7 months after patients with asthma switched to another ICS/LABA. Therefore, these patients should be carefully monitored for at least 4 to 7 months and should be re-assessed at an earlier point in time, if necessary.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276001
spellingShingle Rieko Kondo
Shotaro Maeda
Akira Kikuchi
Hiromichi Kiyono
Tohru Sato
Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.
PLoS ONE
title Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.
title_full Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.
title_fullStr Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.
title_full_unstemmed Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.
title_short Optimal follow-up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma: A retrospective study using Japanese administrative claims data.
title_sort optimal follow up period after switching to another inhaled corticosteroid long acting β2 agonist in patients with asthma a retrospective study using japanese administrative claims data
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276001
work_keys_str_mv AT riekokondo optimalfollowupperiodafterswitchingtoanotherinhaledcorticosteroidlongactingb2agonistinpatientswithasthmaaretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseadministrativeclaimsdata
AT shotaromaeda optimalfollowupperiodafterswitchingtoanotherinhaledcorticosteroidlongactingb2agonistinpatientswithasthmaaretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseadministrativeclaimsdata
AT akirakikuchi optimalfollowupperiodafterswitchingtoanotherinhaledcorticosteroidlongactingb2agonistinpatientswithasthmaaretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseadministrativeclaimsdata
AT hiromichikiyono optimalfollowupperiodafterswitchingtoanotherinhaledcorticosteroidlongactingb2agonistinpatientswithasthmaaretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseadministrativeclaimsdata
AT tohrusato optimalfollowupperiodafterswitchingtoanotherinhaledcorticosteroidlongactingb2agonistinpatientswithasthmaaretrospectivestudyusingjapaneseadministrativeclaimsdata