Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint
Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the validity Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular joint Disorder (DC/TMD) in the diagnosis of disc displacement (DD) disorders of temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Study Design: It was a prospective study in which total of 55 patients accounting...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2020-01-01
|
| Series: | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2020;volume=11;issue=4;spage=332;epage=335;aulast=Goyal |
| _version_ | 1828969732490919936 |
|---|---|
| author | Shikha N Goyal Freny R Karjodkar Kaustubh Sansare |
| author_facet | Shikha N Goyal Freny R Karjodkar Kaustubh Sansare |
| author_sort | Shikha N Goyal |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the validity Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular joint Disorder (DC/TMD) in the diagnosis of disc displacement (DD) disorders of temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Study Design: It was a prospective study in which total of 55 patients accounting to 110 TMJ; with clinical diagnosis of DD disorder as per DC/TMD criteria and all above age of 18 years were included. All the patients with clinical diagnosis of DD disorder were advised MRI. All the MRI scans were read by single radiologist. Clinician and Radiologist were blinded to each others findings. MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis were compared and results were formulated. Results: The use of the Kappa statistic test indicated a good diagnostic agreement (k = 0.68) between the clinician and the radiologist. The DC/TMD criterion was found to have good validity and reliability in the diagnosis of DD disorders with sensitivity of 91.57% and specificity of 77.78%. The positive predictive value and negative predicted value calculated were 92.68% and 78%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio found was 4.12 and 0.11, respectively. Conclusion: DC/TMD is a simple, reliable, valid, cost-effective tool in the diagnosis of DD disorders. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-14T12:36:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2dab15250b304b9f86494aa26b5fc922 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0976-237X 0976-2361 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-14T12:36:19Z |
| publishDate | 2020-01-01 |
| publisher | Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Contemporary Clinical Dentistry |
| spelling | doaj.art-2dab15250b304b9f86494aa26b5fc9222022-12-21T23:01:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsContemporary Clinical Dentistry0976-237X0976-23612020-01-0111433233510.4103/ccd.ccd_237_18Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular jointShikha N GoyalFreny R KarjodkarKaustubh SansareObjective: The objective of this study is to assess the validity Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular joint Disorder (DC/TMD) in the diagnosis of disc displacement (DD) disorders of temporomandibular joint (TMJ). Study Design: It was a prospective study in which total of 55 patients accounting to 110 TMJ; with clinical diagnosis of DD disorder as per DC/TMD criteria and all above age of 18 years were included. All the patients with clinical diagnosis of DD disorder were advised MRI. All the MRI scans were read by single radiologist. Clinician and Radiologist were blinded to each others findings. MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis were compared and results were formulated. Results: The use of the Kappa statistic test indicated a good diagnostic agreement (k = 0.68) between the clinician and the radiologist. The DC/TMD criterion was found to have good validity and reliability in the diagnosis of DD disorders with sensitivity of 91.57% and specificity of 77.78%. The positive predictive value and negative predicted value calculated were 92.68% and 78%, respectively. The positive and negative likelihood ratio found was 4.12 and 0.11, respectively. Conclusion: DC/TMD is a simple, reliable, valid, cost-effective tool in the diagnosis of DD disorders.http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2020;volume=11;issue=4;spage=332;epage=335;aulast=Goyaldiagnostic criteriadisc displacement disordermagnetic resonance imaging |
| spellingShingle | Shikha N Goyal Freny R Karjodkar Kaustubh Sansare Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint Contemporary Clinical Dentistry diagnostic criteria disc displacement disorder magnetic resonance imaging |
| title | Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint |
| title_full | Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint |
| title_fullStr | Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint |
| title_full_unstemmed | Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint |
| title_short | Validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint |
| title_sort | validity of diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular joint disorder in the diagnosis of disc displacement disorders of temporomandibular joint |
| topic | diagnostic criteria disc displacement disorder magnetic resonance imaging |
| url | http://www.contempclindent.org/article.asp?issn=0976-237X;year=2020;volume=11;issue=4;spage=332;epage=335;aulast=Goyal |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT shikhangoyal validityofdiagnosticcriteriafortemporomandibularjointdisorderinthediagnosisofdiscdisplacementdisordersoftemporomandibularjoint AT frenyrkarjodkar validityofdiagnosticcriteriafortemporomandibularjointdisorderinthediagnosisofdiscdisplacementdisordersoftemporomandibularjoint AT kaustubhsansare validityofdiagnosticcriteriafortemporomandibularjointdisorderinthediagnosisofdiscdisplacementdisordersoftemporomandibularjoint |