#101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist Protocol

Background and Aims: We have previous proposed a retrospective matched-case control study comparing the effect of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The result showed the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was significantly higher the in the L...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jui-Chun Chang, Wei-Szu Lin, Ming-Jer Chen, Ching-Heng Lin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: World Scientific Publishing 2023-12-01
Series:Fertility & Reproduction
Online Access:https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2661318223743886
_version_ 1797237048241815552
author Jui-Chun Chang
Wei-Szu Lin
Ming-Jer Chen
Ching-Heng Lin
author_facet Jui-Chun Chang
Wei-Szu Lin
Ming-Jer Chen
Ching-Heng Lin
author_sort Jui-Chun Chang
collection DOAJ
description Background and Aims: We have previous proposed a retrospective matched-case control study comparing the effect of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The result showed the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was significantly higher the in the LH group (53% vs. 64%, p=0.02). In this study we aim to do the cost analysis between these two groups based on our previous study. Method: The analysis consisted of 425 IVF and ICSI cycles performed in Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan between 2013 and 2018 in our previous study. They were chosen by Propensity score matching with balanced age, anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) level, and oocyte retrieval date. There were 259 cycles in hMG ± FSH group and 166 cycles in LH ± FSH group. The total cost related to treatment of each patient was recorded. Results: The treatment cost was showed in Table 1. The total treatment cost per patient was significantly higher in the LH than in the hMG group (USD 4194.93 ± 713.6 vs. $ 4466.33 ± 793.18 p=0.001). However, the mean costs per live birth in the hMG goup was higher with US $7875.42, vs. US $6928.83 in the LH group. The analysis of CLBR in the two groups in different treatment cost range results were showed in Figure 1 and Table 2. The CLBR was almost higher in the LH group in each range except for range between USD 5000-5499. When treatment cost between $4000-4499, the CLBR was significantly higher in the LH group than in the hMG group (81.8% vs. 54.3% p=0.006). Conclusions: The cost analysis showed that recombinant LH is more cost effectiveness than hMG supplementation on FSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T17:13:33Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2daeed2a8477414ab84053eca292f57b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2661-3182
2661-3174
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T17:13:33Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher World Scientific Publishing
record_format Article
series Fertility & Reproduction
spelling doaj.art-2daeed2a8477414ab84053eca292f57b2024-03-28T07:54:18ZengWorld Scientific PublishingFertility & Reproduction2661-31822661-31742023-12-01050466867010.1142/S2661318223743886#101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist ProtocolJui-Chun Chang0Wei-Szu Lin1Ming-Jer Chen2Ching-Heng Lin3Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Taichung, TaiwanTaichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Taichung, TaiwanTaichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Taichung, TaiwanTaichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, Taichung, TaiwanBackground and Aims: We have previous proposed a retrospective matched-case control study comparing the effect of recombinant LH versus hMG supplementation on FSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol. The result showed the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was significantly higher the in the LH group (53% vs. 64%, p=0.02). In this study we aim to do the cost analysis between these two groups based on our previous study. Method: The analysis consisted of 425 IVF and ICSI cycles performed in Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan between 2013 and 2018 in our previous study. They were chosen by Propensity score matching with balanced age, anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) level, and oocyte retrieval date. There were 259 cycles in hMG ± FSH group and 166 cycles in LH ± FSH group. The total cost related to treatment of each patient was recorded. Results: The treatment cost was showed in Table 1. The total treatment cost per patient was significantly higher in the LH than in the hMG group (USD 4194.93 ± 713.6 vs. $ 4466.33 ± 793.18 p=0.001). However, the mean costs per live birth in the hMG goup was higher with US $7875.42, vs. US $6928.83 in the LH group. The analysis of CLBR in the two groups in different treatment cost range results were showed in Figure 1 and Table 2. The CLBR was almost higher in the LH group in each range except for range between USD 5000-5499. When treatment cost between $4000-4499, the CLBR was significantly higher in the LH group than in the hMG group (81.8% vs. 54.3% p=0.006). Conclusions: The cost analysis showed that recombinant LH is more cost effectiveness than hMG supplementation on FSH during COH in the GnRH-antagonist protocol.https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2661318223743886
spellingShingle Jui-Chun Chang
Wei-Szu Lin
Ming-Jer Chen
Ching-Heng Lin
#101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist Protocol
Fertility & Reproduction
title #101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist Protocol
title_full #101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist Protocol
title_fullStr #101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist Protocol
title_full_unstemmed #101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist Protocol
title_short #101 : A Direct Healthcare Cost Analysis of Recombinant LH Versus hMG Supplementation on FSH During Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation in the GnRH-Antagonist Protocol
title_sort 101 a direct healthcare cost analysis of recombinant lh versus hmg supplementation on fsh during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the gnrh antagonist protocol
url https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/10.1142/S2661318223743886
work_keys_str_mv AT juichunchang 101adirecthealthcarecostanalysisofrecombinantlhversushmgsupplementationonfshduringcontrolledovarianhyperstimulationinthegnrhantagonistprotocol
AT weiszulin 101adirecthealthcarecostanalysisofrecombinantlhversushmgsupplementationonfshduringcontrolledovarianhyperstimulationinthegnrhantagonistprotocol
AT mingjerchen 101adirecthealthcarecostanalysisofrecombinantlhversushmgsupplementationonfshduringcontrolledovarianhyperstimulationinthegnrhantagonistprotocol
AT chinghenglin 101adirecthealthcarecostanalysisofrecombinantlhversushmgsupplementationonfshduringcontrolledovarianhyperstimulationinthegnrhantagonistprotocol