Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.

To establish a method for assessing graft viability, in-vivo, following corneal transplantation.Optimization of calcein AM fluorescence and toxicity assessment was performed in cultured human corneal endothelial cells and ex-vivo corneal tissue. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Maninder Bhogal, Chan N Lwin, Xin-Yi Seah, Elavazhagan Murugan, Khadijah Adnan, Shu-Jun Lin, Gary Peh, Jodhbir S Mehta
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5627903?pdf=render
_version_ 1819122833457938432
author Maninder Bhogal
Chan N Lwin
Xin-Yi Seah
Elavazhagan Murugan
Khadijah Adnan
Shu-Jun Lin
Gary Peh
Jodhbir S Mehta
author_facet Maninder Bhogal
Chan N Lwin
Xin-Yi Seah
Elavazhagan Murugan
Khadijah Adnan
Shu-Jun Lin
Gary Peh
Jodhbir S Mehta
author_sort Maninder Bhogal
collection DOAJ
description To establish a method for assessing graft viability, in-vivo, following corneal transplantation.Optimization of calcein AM fluorescence and toxicity assessment was performed in cultured human corneal endothelial cells and ex-vivo corneal tissue. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts were incubated with calcein AM and imaged pre and post preparation, and in-situ after insertion and unfolding in a pig eye model. Global, macroscopic images of the entire graft and individual cell resolution could be attained by altering the magnification of a clinical confocal scanning laser microscope. Patterns of cell loss observed in situ were compared to those seen using standard ex-vivo techniques.Calcein AM showed a positive dose-fluorescence relationship. A dose of 2.67μmol was sufficient to allow clear discrimination between viable and non-viable areas (sensitivity of 96.6% with a specificity of 96.1%) and was not toxic to cultured endothelial cells or ex-vivo corneal tissue. Patterns of cell loss seen in-situ closely matched those seen on ex-vivo assessment with fluorescence viability imaging, trypan blue/alizarin red staining or scanning electron microscopy. Iatrogenic graft damage from preparation and insertion varied between 7-35% and incarceration of the graft tissue within surgical wounds was identified as a significant cause of endothelial damage.In-situ graft viability assessment using clinical imaging devices provides comparable information to ex-vivo methods. This method shows high sensitivity and specificity, is non-toxic and can be used to evaluate immediate cell viability in new grafting techniques in-vivo.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T06:58:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2dbf91cc5f8b4ba78e9cc7dc6290a7ac
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T06:58:44Z
publishDate 2017-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2dbf91cc5f8b4ba78e9cc7dc6290a7ac2022-12-21T18:34:51ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011210e018482410.1371/journal.pone.0184824Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.Maninder BhogalChan N LwinXin-Yi SeahElavazhagan MuruganKhadijah AdnanShu-Jun LinGary PehJodhbir S MehtaTo establish a method for assessing graft viability, in-vivo, following corneal transplantation.Optimization of calcein AM fluorescence and toxicity assessment was performed in cultured human corneal endothelial cells and ex-vivo corneal tissue. Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty grafts were incubated with calcein AM and imaged pre and post preparation, and in-situ after insertion and unfolding in a pig eye model. Global, macroscopic images of the entire graft and individual cell resolution could be attained by altering the magnification of a clinical confocal scanning laser microscope. Patterns of cell loss observed in situ were compared to those seen using standard ex-vivo techniques.Calcein AM showed a positive dose-fluorescence relationship. A dose of 2.67μmol was sufficient to allow clear discrimination between viable and non-viable areas (sensitivity of 96.6% with a specificity of 96.1%) and was not toxic to cultured endothelial cells or ex-vivo corneal tissue. Patterns of cell loss seen in-situ closely matched those seen on ex-vivo assessment with fluorescence viability imaging, trypan blue/alizarin red staining or scanning electron microscopy. Iatrogenic graft damage from preparation and insertion varied between 7-35% and incarceration of the graft tissue within surgical wounds was identified as a significant cause of endothelial damage.In-situ graft viability assessment using clinical imaging devices provides comparable information to ex-vivo methods. This method shows high sensitivity and specificity, is non-toxic and can be used to evaluate immediate cell viability in new grafting techniques in-vivo.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5627903?pdf=render
spellingShingle Maninder Bhogal
Chan N Lwin
Xin-Yi Seah
Elavazhagan Murugan
Khadijah Adnan
Shu-Jun Lin
Gary Peh
Jodhbir S Mehta
Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.
PLoS ONE
title Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.
title_full Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.
title_fullStr Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.
title_full_unstemmed Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.
title_short Real-time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for DMEK.
title_sort real time assessment of corneal endothelial cell damage following graft preparation and donor insertion for dmek
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5627903?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT maninderbhogal realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek
AT channlwin realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek
AT xinyiseah realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek
AT elavazhaganmurugan realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek
AT khadijahadnan realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek
AT shujunlin realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek
AT garypeh realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek
AT jodhbirsmehta realtimeassessmentofcornealendothelialcelldamagefollowinggraftpreparationanddonorinsertionfordmek