Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG Galaxies

Weak gravitational lensing shear could be measured far more precisely if information about unlensed attributes of source galaxies were available. Disk galaxy velocity fields supply such information, at least in principle, with idealized models predicting orders of magnitude more Fisher information w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jean Donet, David Wittman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbb70
_version_ 1797697172932657152
author Jean Donet
David Wittman
author_facet Jean Donet
David Wittman
author_sort Jean Donet
collection DOAJ
description Weak gravitational lensing shear could be measured far more precisely if information about unlensed attributes of source galaxies were available. Disk galaxy velocity fields supply such information, at least in principle, with idealized models predicting orders of magnitude more Fisher information when velocity-field observations are used to complement images. To test the level at which realistic features of disk galaxies (warps, bars, spiral arms, and other substructure) inject noise or bias into such shear measurements, we fit an idealized disk model, including shear, to unsheared galaxies in the Illustris TNG100 simulation. The inferred shear thus indicates the extent to which unmodeled galaxy features inject noise and bias. We find that γ _+ , the component of shear parallel to the galaxy’s first principal axis, is highly biased and noisy because disks violate the assumption of face-on circularity, displaying a range of intrinsic axis ratios (0.85 ± 0.11). The other shear component, γ _× , shows little bias and is well-described by a double Gaussian distribution with central core scatter σ _core ≈ 0.03, with low-amplitude, broad wings. This is the first measurement of the natural noise floor in the proposed velocity-field lensing technique. We conclude that the technique will achieve impressive precision gains for measurements of γ _× , but little gain for measurements of γ _+ .
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:36:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2dbfa9acf018471e96975bee5c511a6a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-4357
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:36:28Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj.art-2dbfa9acf018471e96975bee5c511a6a2023-09-03T13:08:56ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572023-01-0194528810.3847/1538-4357/acbb70Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG GalaxiesJean Donet0David Wittman1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0813-5888Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California , Davis, CA 95616, USA ; dwittman@physics.ucdavis.eduDepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of California , Davis, CA 95616, USA ; dwittman@physics.ucdavis.eduWeak gravitational lensing shear could be measured far more precisely if information about unlensed attributes of source galaxies were available. Disk galaxy velocity fields supply such information, at least in principle, with idealized models predicting orders of magnitude more Fisher information when velocity-field observations are used to complement images. To test the level at which realistic features of disk galaxies (warps, bars, spiral arms, and other substructure) inject noise or bias into such shear measurements, we fit an idealized disk model, including shear, to unsheared galaxies in the Illustris TNG100 simulation. The inferred shear thus indicates the extent to which unmodeled galaxy features inject noise and bias. We find that γ _+ , the component of shear parallel to the galaxy’s first principal axis, is highly biased and noisy because disks violate the assumption of face-on circularity, displaying a range of intrinsic axis ratios (0.85 ± 0.11). The other shear component, γ _× , shows little bias and is well-described by a double Gaussian distribution with central core scatter σ _core ≈ 0.03, with low-amplitude, broad wings. This is the first measurement of the natural noise floor in the proposed velocity-field lensing technique. We conclude that the technique will achieve impressive precision gains for measurements of γ _× , but little gain for measurements of γ _+ .https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbb70Gravitational lensingGravitational lensing shearWeak gravitational lensingGalaxy kinematicsMagnetohydrodynamical simulations
spellingShingle Jean Donet
David Wittman
Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG Galaxies
The Astrophysical Journal
Gravitational lensing
Gravitational lensing shear
Weak gravitational lensing
Galaxy kinematics
Magnetohydrodynamical simulations
title Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG Galaxies
title_full Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG Galaxies
title_fullStr Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG Galaxies
title_full_unstemmed Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG Galaxies
title_short Testing Velocity-field Lensing on IllustrisTNG Galaxies
title_sort testing velocity field lensing on illustristng galaxies
topic Gravitational lensing
Gravitational lensing shear
Weak gravitational lensing
Galaxy kinematics
Magnetohydrodynamical simulations
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acbb70
work_keys_str_mv AT jeandonet testingvelocityfieldlensingonillustristnggalaxies
AT davidwittman testingvelocityfieldlensingonillustristnggalaxies