Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia

Objectives: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of tramadol vs pethidine for treatment of shivering occurring after spinal anesthesia. Study Design: Double blind comparative study. Place and duration of study: Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine, Combined Military H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faisal Wahid, Aftab Hussain, Faiz ur Rehman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Rawalpindi Medical University 2019-09-01
Series:Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
Online Access:https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1202
_version_ 1811259707282685952
author Faisal Wahid
Aftab Hussain
Faiz ur Rehman
author_facet Faisal Wahid
Aftab Hussain
Faiz ur Rehman
author_sort Faisal Wahid
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of tramadol vs pethidine for treatment of shivering occurring after spinal anesthesia. Study Design: Double blind comparative study. Place and duration of study: Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine, Combined Military Hospital Malir Cantt Karachi from 1st September to 31st December 2017. Methodology: 70 patients were selected following non-random convenient sampling and were divided into Group A and B. Group A received 0.25mg/kg tramadol while Group B received 0.35mg/kg pethidine. Time to complete control of shivering was noted. Nausea and vomiting were also evaluated by using a four-point scale (Table1). Results: Shivering was successfully controlled in 91.4% and 85.7% respectively in group A and B; success rates were not statistically different (p=0.23). Average time between injection tramadol to complete control of shivering in successfully treated Group A patients was 210±63 seconds (range of 100 to 310 seconds) and for pethidine average time was 174±52 seconds (range of 90 to 258 seconds). Pethidine showed a shorter time to control shivering which was statistically significant (p=0.09) but in real time amounted to an average of 0.6 minutes (Figure 2). Nausea and vomiting were more frequent (14.3% vs 8.6%) in group B as compared to Group A and this was statistically significant (p=0.03). Conclusion: Tramadol was found to be as effective as pethidine in controlling shivering with fewer side effects in spinal anesthesia
first_indexed 2024-04-12T18:35:39Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2df562860a2f4a77ae203968b7455ba5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1683-3562
1683-3570
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T18:35:39Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher Rawalpindi Medical University
record_format Article
series Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
spelling doaj.art-2df562860a2f4a77ae203968b7455ba52022-12-22T03:20:57ZengRawalpindi Medical UniversityJournal of Rawalpindi Medical College1683-35621683-35702019-09-01233Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesiaFaisal Wahid0Aftab HussainFaiz ur Rehman1Combined Military Hospital Malir CanttCombined Military Hospital Malir CanttObjectives: The aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of tramadol vs pethidine for treatment of shivering occurring after spinal anesthesia. Study Design: Double blind comparative study. Place and duration of study: Department of anesthesiology and pain medicine, Combined Military Hospital Malir Cantt Karachi from 1st September to 31st December 2017. Methodology: 70 patients were selected following non-random convenient sampling and were divided into Group A and B. Group A received 0.25mg/kg tramadol while Group B received 0.35mg/kg pethidine. Time to complete control of shivering was noted. Nausea and vomiting were also evaluated by using a four-point scale (Table1). Results: Shivering was successfully controlled in 91.4% and 85.7% respectively in group A and B; success rates were not statistically different (p=0.23). Average time between injection tramadol to complete control of shivering in successfully treated Group A patients was 210±63 seconds (range of 100 to 310 seconds) and for pethidine average time was 174±52 seconds (range of 90 to 258 seconds). Pethidine showed a shorter time to control shivering which was statistically significant (p=0.09) but in real time amounted to an average of 0.6 minutes (Figure 2). Nausea and vomiting were more frequent (14.3% vs 8.6%) in group B as compared to Group A and this was statistically significant (p=0.03). Conclusion: Tramadol was found to be as effective as pethidine in controlling shivering with fewer side effects in spinal anesthesiahttps://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1202
spellingShingle Faisal Wahid
Aftab Hussain
Faiz ur Rehman
Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia
Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College
title Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia
title_full Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia
title_fullStr Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia
title_short Comparison of Tramadol and Pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia
title_sort comparison of tramadol and pethidine for the treatment of shivering during spinal anesthesia
url https://www.journalrmc.com/index.php/JRMC/article/view/1202
work_keys_str_mv AT faisalwahid comparisonoftramadolandpethidineforthetreatmentofshiveringduringspinalanesthesia
AT aftabhussain comparisonoftramadolandpethidineforthetreatmentofshiveringduringspinalanesthesia
AT faizurrehman comparisonoftramadolandpethidineforthetreatmentofshiveringduringspinalanesthesia