Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen

Abstract Background There is speculation that beef bull semen quality is inferior to that of dairy bulls although few scientific studies are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate sperm quality in beef bull semen and to determine which parameters could be indicative of fe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jane Margaret Morrell, Andra Sabina Valeanu, Nils Lundeheim, Anders Johannisson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2018-07-01
Series:Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13028-018-0396-2
_version_ 1818621475904552960
author Jane Margaret Morrell
Andra Sabina Valeanu
Nils Lundeheim
Anders Johannisson
author_facet Jane Margaret Morrell
Andra Sabina Valeanu
Nils Lundeheim
Anders Johannisson
author_sort Jane Margaret Morrell
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background There is speculation that beef bull semen quality is inferior to that of dairy bulls although few scientific studies are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate sperm quality in beef bull semen and to determine which parameters could be indicative of fertility after insemination. Sperm quality, assessed by computer assisted sperm motility analysis and flow cytometric evaluation of membrane integrity, levels of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial membrane potential, acrosome status and DNA fragmentation index, was evaluated in beef and dairy bull semen. Results For beef bulls, normal morphology (r = 0.62, P < 0.05) and WOBBLE (r = 0.57, P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with 56-day non-return rate, whereas sperm quality was not significantly correlated with the fertility index score for dairy bulls. Membrane integrity (46 ± 8.0% versus 40 ± 11%, P < 0.05), normal morphology (87 ± 6% versus 76 ± 8%; P < 0.05), and high respiratory activity (52 ± 13 versus 12 ± 4%; P < 0.001) were higher for dairy bulls than for beef bulls. The DNA fragmentation index was lower for dairy bull spermatozoa than beef (3.8 ± 1.1% versus 6.1 ± 2.9%; P < 0.01), whereas some sperm kinematics were higher. Multivariate analysis indicated that type of bull (beef versus dairy) had an impact on sperm quality. Conclusions Different assays of sperm quality may be needed for appropriate analysis of beef and dairy bull semen. These finding could be important for cattle breeding stations when evaluating semen quality.
first_indexed 2024-12-16T18:09:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2df6707d265e4bf28e3f6aaab4d9e3a8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1751-0147
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-16T18:09:52Z
publishDate 2018-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
spelling doaj.art-2df6707d265e4bf28e3f6aaab4d9e3a82022-12-21T22:21:48ZengBMCActa Veterinaria Scandinavica1751-01472018-07-0160111010.1186/s13028-018-0396-2Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semenJane Margaret Morrell0Andra Sabina Valeanu1Nils Lundeheim2Anders Johannisson3Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural SciencesDivision of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)Abstract Background There is speculation that beef bull semen quality is inferior to that of dairy bulls although few scientific studies are available in the literature. The aim of this study was to evaluate sperm quality in beef bull semen and to determine which parameters could be indicative of fertility after insemination. Sperm quality, assessed by computer assisted sperm motility analysis and flow cytometric evaluation of membrane integrity, levels of reactive oxygen species, mitochondrial membrane potential, acrosome status and DNA fragmentation index, was evaluated in beef and dairy bull semen. Results For beef bulls, normal morphology (r = 0.62, P < 0.05) and WOBBLE (r = 0.57, P < 0.05) were significantly correlated with 56-day non-return rate, whereas sperm quality was not significantly correlated with the fertility index score for dairy bulls. Membrane integrity (46 ± 8.0% versus 40 ± 11%, P < 0.05), normal morphology (87 ± 6% versus 76 ± 8%; P < 0.05), and high respiratory activity (52 ± 13 versus 12 ± 4%; P < 0.001) were higher for dairy bulls than for beef bulls. The DNA fragmentation index was lower for dairy bull spermatozoa than beef (3.8 ± 1.1% versus 6.1 ± 2.9%; P < 0.01), whereas some sperm kinematics were higher. Multivariate analysis indicated that type of bull (beef versus dairy) had an impact on sperm quality. Conclusions Different assays of sperm quality may be needed for appropriate analysis of beef and dairy bull semen. These finding could be important for cattle breeding stations when evaluating semen quality.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13028-018-0396-2Chromatin integrityMembrane integrityMitochondrial membrane potentialMotilityReactive oxygen species
spellingShingle Jane Margaret Morrell
Andra Sabina Valeanu
Nils Lundeheim
Anders Johannisson
Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica
Chromatin integrity
Membrane integrity
Mitochondrial membrane potential
Motility
Reactive oxygen species
title Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen
title_full Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen
title_fullStr Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen
title_full_unstemmed Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen
title_short Sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen
title_sort sperm quality in frozen beef and dairy bull semen
topic Chromatin integrity
Membrane integrity
Mitochondrial membrane potential
Motility
Reactive oxygen species
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13028-018-0396-2
work_keys_str_mv AT janemargaretmorrell spermqualityinfrozenbeefanddairybullsemen
AT andrasabinavaleanu spermqualityinfrozenbeefanddairybullsemen
AT nilslundeheim spermqualityinfrozenbeefanddairybullsemen
AT andersjohannisson spermqualityinfrozenbeefanddairybullsemen