Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific Works

Law is a set of institutional statements that oblige, prohibit, or authorize actions for actors in different situations. Understanding these language-based institutional statements will help to better understand processes and design more efficient policies. However, the linguistic complexities conta...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Reza Hesan, Amir Hossein Seddighi, Rahman Sharifzadeh
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology 2020-07-01
Series:Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article-1-4371-en.html
_version_ 1818288291713122304
author Reza Hesan
Amir Hossein Seddighi
Rahman Sharifzadeh
author_facet Reza Hesan
Amir Hossein Seddighi
Rahman Sharifzadeh
author_sort Reza Hesan
collection DOAJ
description Law is a set of institutional statements that oblige, prohibit, or authorize actions for actors in different situations. Understanding these language-based institutional statements will help to better understand processes and design more efficient policies. However, the linguistic complexities contained in the text of these propositions have made it difficult to process them. In order to overcome these problems, this paper presents a systematic way of processing rules in Persian language based on institutional grammar tool. Institutional grammar tool uses a general syntactic structure, including the five components: “attributes”, “deontic”, “aim”, “conditions”, and “or else”. “Attribute” is any kind of value that separates the actors subject to the institutional statement from other actors. “Deontic” expresses possible (permitted), must (obligatory), and must not (forbidden) meanings. “Aim” describes the action and consequence that the deontic component is concerned with. “Conditions” refer to variables that specify the time and place that an action is permitted, obligatory, or forbidden. “Or else” relates to the consequence of non-compliance. The most important component that should be considered more due to the characteristics of Persian language as the contextual language of this research is the “Deontic” component. In this regard, by examining the literature and studying the existing laws, the examples of expressing the deontic component in Persian language in the form of modal verbs, linking sentences and declarative sentences are identified and classified according to the different types of deontic. Finally, the proposed systematic method is used for analysing the law on preventing and combating fraud in carrying out scientific works. The results of this analysis indicate some shortcomings in this law. For example, some of the main actors who can contribute to the process of preventing fraud in scientific works have been neglected. The “or else” component has not been explicitly stated in many statements which may decrease the effectiveness of these statements as they may be treated as a norm, which are not obligatory, instead of rules. The results of this analysis led to a better understanding of the law and the identification of its shortcomings, which could be used for further corrections.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T01:54:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e11d883aa284bb08b1d0e392b054b4a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2251-8223
2251-8231
language fas
last_indexed 2024-12-13T01:54:03Z
publishDate 2020-07-01
publisher Iranian Research Institute for Information and Technology
record_format Article
series Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
spelling doaj.art-2e11d883aa284bb08b1d0e392b054b4a2022-12-22T00:03:27ZfasIranian Research Institute for Information and TechnologyIranian Journal of Information Processing & Management2251-82232251-82312020-07-01354893920Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific WorksReza Hesan0Amir Hossein Seddighi1Rahman Sharifzadeh2 Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc) Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc) Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc) Law is a set of institutional statements that oblige, prohibit, or authorize actions for actors in different situations. Understanding these language-based institutional statements will help to better understand processes and design more efficient policies. However, the linguistic complexities contained in the text of these propositions have made it difficult to process them. In order to overcome these problems, this paper presents a systematic way of processing rules in Persian language based on institutional grammar tool. Institutional grammar tool uses a general syntactic structure, including the five components: “attributes”, “deontic”, “aim”, “conditions”, and “or else”. “Attribute” is any kind of value that separates the actors subject to the institutional statement from other actors. “Deontic” expresses possible (permitted), must (obligatory), and must not (forbidden) meanings. “Aim” describes the action and consequence that the deontic component is concerned with. “Conditions” refer to variables that specify the time and place that an action is permitted, obligatory, or forbidden. “Or else” relates to the consequence of non-compliance. The most important component that should be considered more due to the characteristics of Persian language as the contextual language of this research is the “Deontic” component. In this regard, by examining the literature and studying the existing laws, the examples of expressing the deontic component in Persian language in the form of modal verbs, linking sentences and declarative sentences are identified and classified according to the different types of deontic. Finally, the proposed systematic method is used for analysing the law on preventing and combating fraud in carrying out scientific works. The results of this analysis indicate some shortcomings in this law. For example, some of the main actors who can contribute to the process of preventing fraud in scientific works have been neglected. The “or else” component has not been explicitly stated in many statements which may decrease the effectiveness of these statements as they may be treated as a norm, which are not obligatory, instead of rules. The results of this analysis led to a better understanding of the law and the identification of its shortcomings, which could be used for further corrections.http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article-1-4371-en.htmllawrule processinginstitutional analysisinstitutional grammar toolinformation technology.
spellingShingle Reza Hesan
Amir Hossein Seddighi
Rahman Sharifzadeh
Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific Works
Iranian Journal of Information Processing & Management
law
rule processing
institutional analysis
institutional grammar tool
information technology.
title Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific Works
title_full Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific Works
title_fullStr Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific Works
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific Works
title_short Systematic Analysis of Law:A Case study of The Iranian Law on Preventing and Confronting Misconducts in Scientific Works
title_sort systematic analysis of law a case study of the iranian law on preventing and confronting misconducts in scientific works
topic law
rule processing
institutional analysis
institutional grammar tool
information technology.
url http://jipm.irandoc.ac.ir/article-1-4371-en.html
work_keys_str_mv AT rezahesan systematicanalysisoflawacasestudyoftheiranianlawonpreventingandconfrontingmisconductsinscientificworks
AT amirhosseinseddighi systematicanalysisoflawacasestudyoftheiranianlawonpreventingandconfrontingmisconductsinscientificworks
AT rahmansharifzadeh systematicanalysisoflawacasestudyoftheiranianlawonpreventingandconfrontingmisconductsinscientificworks