Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis

Background: The NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid Test is a commercially available lateral flow serological assay that is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. We conducted a study to estimate diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosis of active pulmonary tubercul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gideon Nsubuga, Samuel Kennedy, Yasha Rani, Zibran Hafiz, Soyeon Kim, Morten Ruhwald, David Alland, Jerrold Ellner, Moses Joloba, Susan E. Dorman, Adam Penn-Nicholson, Lydia Nakiyingi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-05-01
Series:Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000189
_version_ 1797837760779780096
author Gideon Nsubuga
Samuel Kennedy
Yasha Rani
Zibran Hafiz
Soyeon Kim
Morten Ruhwald
David Alland
Jerrold Ellner
Moses Joloba
Susan E. Dorman
Adam Penn-Nicholson
Lydia Nakiyingi
author_facet Gideon Nsubuga
Samuel Kennedy
Yasha Rani
Zibran Hafiz
Soyeon Kim
Morten Ruhwald
David Alland
Jerrold Ellner
Moses Joloba
Susan E. Dorman
Adam Penn-Nicholson
Lydia Nakiyingi
author_sort Gideon Nsubuga
collection DOAJ
description Background: The NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid Test is a commercially available lateral flow serological assay that is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. We conducted a study to estimate diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease and for detection of M. tuberculosis infection. Methods: This study used existing frozen plasma specimens that had been obtained previously from consenting HIV-negative adults in Cambodia, South Africa, and Vietnam whose tuberculosis status was rigorously characterized using sputum mycobacterial cultures and blood interferon gamma release assay. The investigational assay was performed in a single laboratory by laboratory staff specifically trained to conduct the assays according to the manufacturer’s procedures. In addition, intensity of the test band was subjectively assessed. Results: Plasma specimens from 150 participants were tested. All testing attempts yielded a determinate result of either positive or negative. For diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, test sensitivity and specificity were 40.0 % (20/50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 27.6 % to 53.8 %) and 85.0 % (95 % CI 76.7 % to 90.7 %), respectively. For detection of M. tuberculosis infection, test sensitivity and specificity were 28.0 % (95 % CI 20.5 % to 37.2 %) and 86.0 % (95 % CI 73.8 % to 93.0 %), respectively. Among the 35 positive tests, no statistically significant band intensity trend was found across participant groups (p = 0.17). Conclusion: Study findings do not support a role for the NOVA Tuberculosis Test in current tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:29:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e1218e8ee2546c99f669e0b2aadd7b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2405-5794
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:29:51Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
spelling doaj.art-2e1218e8ee2546c99f669e0b2aadd7b12023-04-28T08:55:55ZengElsevierJournal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases2405-57942023-05-0131100362Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosisGideon Nsubuga0Samuel Kennedy1Yasha Rani2Zibran Hafiz3Soyeon Kim4Morten Ruhwald5David Alland6Jerrold Ellner7Moses Joloba8Susan E. Dorman9Adam Penn-Nicholson10Lydia Nakiyingi11College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USAFrontier Science Foundation, Brookline, MA, USARutgers University – New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USAFrontier Science Foundation, Brookline, MA, USAFIND, Geneva, SwitzerlandRutgers University – New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USARutgers University – New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USACollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; Corresponding author at: Medical University of South Carolina, 135 Rutledge Avenue, Room 1207, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.FIND, Geneva, SwitzerlandCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, UgandaBackground: The NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid Test is a commercially available lateral flow serological assay that is intended to be used as an aid in the diagnosis of tuberculosis. We conducted a study to estimate diagnostic accuracy of this assay for diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease and for detection of M. tuberculosis infection. Methods: This study used existing frozen plasma specimens that had been obtained previously from consenting HIV-negative adults in Cambodia, South Africa, and Vietnam whose tuberculosis status was rigorously characterized using sputum mycobacterial cultures and blood interferon gamma release assay. The investigational assay was performed in a single laboratory by laboratory staff specifically trained to conduct the assays according to the manufacturer’s procedures. In addition, intensity of the test band was subjectively assessed. Results: Plasma specimens from 150 participants were tested. All testing attempts yielded a determinate result of either positive or negative. For diagnosis of active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, test sensitivity and specificity were 40.0 % (20/50, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 27.6 % to 53.8 %) and 85.0 % (95 % CI 76.7 % to 90.7 %), respectively. For detection of M. tuberculosis infection, test sensitivity and specificity were 28.0 % (95 % CI 20.5 % to 37.2 %) and 86.0 % (95 % CI 73.8 % to 93.0 %), respectively. Among the 35 positive tests, no statistically significant band intensity trend was found across participant groups (p = 0.17). Conclusion: Study findings do not support a role for the NOVA Tuberculosis Test in current tuberculosis diagnostic algorithms.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000189TuberculosisMycobacteriaDiagnostic accuracySpecificitySensitivityLateral flow
spellingShingle Gideon Nsubuga
Samuel Kennedy
Yasha Rani
Zibran Hafiz
Soyeon Kim
Morten Ruhwald
David Alland
Jerrold Ellner
Moses Joloba
Susan E. Dorman
Adam Penn-Nicholson
Lydia Nakiyingi
Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases
Tuberculosis
Mycobacteria
Diagnostic accuracy
Specificity
Sensitivity
Lateral flow
title Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_fullStr Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_short Diagnostic accuracy of the NOVA Tuberculosis Total Antibody Rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
title_sort diagnostic accuracy of the nova tuberculosis total antibody rapid test for detection of pulmonary tuberculosis and infection with mycobacterium tuberculosis
topic Tuberculosis
Mycobacteria
Diagnostic accuracy
Specificity
Sensitivity
Lateral flow
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405579423000189
work_keys_str_mv AT gideonnsubuga diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT samuelkennedy diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT yasharani diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT zibranhafiz diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT soyeonkim diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT mortenruhwald diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT davidalland diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT jerroldellner diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT mosesjoloba diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT susanedorman diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT adampennnicholson diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis
AT lydianakiyingi diagnosticaccuracyofthenovatuberculosistotalantibodyrapidtestfordetectionofpulmonarytuberculosisandinfectionwithmycobacteriumtuberculosis