Naturalizing Self-Consciousness
The crucial problem of self-consciousness is how to account for knowing self-reference without launching into a regress or without presupposing self-consciousness rather than accounting for it (circle). In the literature we find two bottom-up proposals for solving the traditional problem: the postul...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages
2018-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7995_a9259d8d561c5997da7831085e4f5f41.pdf |
_version_ | 1797723746540191744 |
---|---|
author | رابرتو هوراسیو دِ سَ پِرِیرا |
author_facet | رابرتو هوراسیو دِ سَ پِرِیرا |
author_sort | رابرتو هوراسیو دِ سَ پِرِیرا |
collection | DOAJ |
description | The crucial problem of self-consciousness is how to account for knowing self-reference without launching into a regress or without presupposing self-consciousness rather than accounting for it (circle). In the literature we find two bottom-up proposals for solving the traditional problem: the postulation of nonconceptual forms of self-consciousness and the postulation of a pre-reflexive form of self-consciousness. However, none of them seems satisfactory for several reasons. In contrast, I believe that the only way of solving this traditional puzzle is to assume another bottom-up approach, namely the one that accepts Baker’s challenge to naturalism and provides a naturalist framework for self-consciousness; in Baker’s terms, to account for self-consciousness in non-intentional, non-semantic, and non-mental terms. That is the aim of this paper. My thesis rests on two claims. The first is the metaphysical claim that every creature enjoys a fundamental relation to itself, namely identity. The second is Dretske’s epistemological claim that representations do not require a Self, traditionally understood as the principle that spontaneously organizes mental activity and lies behind all intentional acts. Briefly, I argue for a naturalization of self-consciousness that postulates non-linguistic, naturalized, and selfless form of representation of the cognitive system based on the metaphysical, fundamental relation everyone has to himself, namely identity. Self-consciousness emerges when brain states are selflessly recruited through learning to represent the cognitive system itself as a subject. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:07:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2e15837654484777836bd9b82a42663d |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2251-7960 2423-4419 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-12T10:07:10Z |
publishDate | 2018-09-01 |
publisher | University of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen Languages |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Philosophical Investigations |
spelling | doaj.art-2e15837654484777836bd9b82a42663d2023-09-02T11:08:16ZengUniversity of Tabriz, Faculty of Literature and Forigen LanguagesJournal of Philosophical Investigations2251-79602423-44192018-09-0112241451707995Naturalizing Self-Consciousnessرابرتو هوراسیو دِ سَ پِرِیرا0استاد فلسفه، دانشگاه فدرال زیو دو ژانیرو برزیلThe crucial problem of self-consciousness is how to account for knowing self-reference without launching into a regress or without presupposing self-consciousness rather than accounting for it (circle). In the literature we find two bottom-up proposals for solving the traditional problem: the postulation of nonconceptual forms of self-consciousness and the postulation of a pre-reflexive form of self-consciousness. However, none of them seems satisfactory for several reasons. In contrast, I believe that the only way of solving this traditional puzzle is to assume another bottom-up approach, namely the one that accepts Baker’s challenge to naturalism and provides a naturalist framework for self-consciousness; in Baker’s terms, to account for self-consciousness in non-intentional, non-semantic, and non-mental terms. That is the aim of this paper. My thesis rests on two claims. The first is the metaphysical claim that every creature enjoys a fundamental relation to itself, namely identity. The second is Dretske’s epistemological claim that representations do not require a Self, traditionally understood as the principle that spontaneously organizes mental activity and lies behind all intentional acts. Briefly, I argue for a naturalization of self-consciousness that postulates non-linguistic, naturalized, and selfless form of representation of the cognitive system based on the metaphysical, fundamental relation everyone has to himself, namely identity. Self-consciousness emerges when brain states are selflessly recruited through learning to represent the cognitive system itself as a subject.http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7995_a9259d8d561c5997da7831085e4f5f41.pdfSelf-consciousnessnonconceptual self-consciousnesspre-reflexive self-consciousnessnaturalization of self-consciousness |
spellingShingle | رابرتو هوراسیو دِ سَ پِرِیرا Naturalizing Self-Consciousness Journal of Philosophical Investigations Self-consciousness nonconceptual self-consciousness pre-reflexive self-consciousness naturalization of self-consciousness |
title | Naturalizing Self-Consciousness |
title_full | Naturalizing Self-Consciousness |
title_fullStr | Naturalizing Self-Consciousness |
title_full_unstemmed | Naturalizing Self-Consciousness |
title_short | Naturalizing Self-Consciousness |
title_sort | naturalizing self consciousness |
topic | Self-consciousness nonconceptual self-consciousness pre-reflexive self-consciousness naturalization of self-consciousness |
url | http://philosophy.tabrizu.ac.ir/article_7995_a9259d8d561c5997da7831085e4f5f41.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rạbrtwhwrạsywdisapiriyrạ naturalizingselfconsciousness |