Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives

Introduction: Bonding orthodontic attachments to large amalgam restorations of posterior teeth is a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic attachments bonded to amalgam with different chemical surface preparations.Materials and metho...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Forogh Khalilinejad, Shiva Alavi
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences 2011-01-01
Series:مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
Subjects:
Online Access:http://jids.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/223
_version_ 1827851691585699840
author Forogh Khalilinejad
Shiva Alavi
author_facet Forogh Khalilinejad
Shiva Alavi
author_sort Forogh Khalilinejad
collection DOAJ
description Introduction: Bonding orthodontic attachments to large amalgam restorations of posterior teeth is a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic attachments bonded to amalgam with different chemical surface preparations.Materials and methods: In this in vitro study 105 convex amalgam surface samples were subjected to aluminium oxide sandblasting. The amalgam sampless were randomly divided into three equal groups. In each group buccal tubes were bonded with Transbond Plus using Reliance Metal Primer (RMP), All Bond II (AB2), and Alloy Primer (AP). Thirty-five human teeth served as the controls to test buccal tube bonding to acid-etched enamel with Transbond Plus and Transbond XT. All the samples were stored in artificial saliva; after thermocycling for 1000 times, all the sampels were tested for SBS. Data were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.Results: There were statistically significant differences in SBS values between all the groups (p value < 0.001). AB2 created the strongest bond to amalgam (6.75 MPa). However, there were no significant differences between SBS values achieved with AB2 and those in the control group (p value = 0.455). No Significant differences were observed between AP and RMP (p value = 0.051) but both had significant differences with the control group (p value < 0.001).Conclusion: The results of the present study revealed that AB2 intermediate resin is useful for strong bonding of metal orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam.Key words: Acrylic resin, Artificial saliva, Dental amalgam, Shear bond strength.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T10:37:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e1f1eda214e435fb5d876078cc6c21f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-255X
2008-6989
language fas
last_indexed 2024-03-12T10:37:19Z
publishDate 2011-01-01
publisher Isfahan University of Medical Sciences
record_format Article
series مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
spelling doaj.art-2e1f1eda214e435fb5d876078cc6c21f2023-09-02T08:35:08ZfasIsfahan University of Medical Sciencesمجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان1735-255X2008-69892011-01-0164305314Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesivesForogh KhalilinejadShiva AlaviIntroduction: Bonding orthodontic attachments to large amalgam restorations of posterior teeth is a challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of orthodontic attachments bonded to amalgam with different chemical surface preparations.Materials and methods: In this in vitro study 105 convex amalgam surface samples were subjected to aluminium oxide sandblasting. The amalgam sampless were randomly divided into three equal groups. In each group buccal tubes were bonded with Transbond Plus using Reliance Metal Primer (RMP), All Bond II (AB2), and Alloy Primer (AP). Thirty-five human teeth served as the controls to test buccal tube bonding to acid-etched enamel with Transbond Plus and Transbond XT. All the samples were stored in artificial saliva; after thermocycling for 1000 times, all the sampels were tested for SBS. Data were analysed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests.Results: There were statistically significant differences in SBS values between all the groups (p value < 0.001). AB2 created the strongest bond to amalgam (6.75 MPa). However, there were no significant differences between SBS values achieved with AB2 and those in the control group (p value = 0.455). No Significant differences were observed between AP and RMP (p value = 0.051) but both had significant differences with the control group (p value < 0.001).Conclusion: The results of the present study revealed that AB2 intermediate resin is useful for strong bonding of metal orthodontic attachments to dental amalgam.Key words: Acrylic resin, Artificial saliva, Dental amalgam, Shear bond strength.http://jids.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/223Key words: Acrylic resinArtificial salivaDental amalgamShear bond strength.
spellingShingle Forogh Khalilinejad
Shiva Alavi
Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives
مجله دانشکده دندانپزشکی اصفهان
Key words: Acrylic resin
Artificial saliva
Dental amalgam
Shear bond strength.
title Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives
title_full Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives
title_fullStr Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives
title_short Comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives
title_sort comparison of shear bond strength of orthodontic attachments bonded to sandblasted amalgam with different adhesives
topic Key words: Acrylic resin
Artificial saliva
Dental amalgam
Shear bond strength.
url http://jids.mui.ac.ir/index.php/jids/article/view/223
work_keys_str_mv AT foroghkhalilinejad comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticattachmentsbondedtosandblastedamalgamwithdifferentadhesives
AT shivaalavi comparisonofshearbondstrengthoforthodonticattachmentsbondedtosandblastedamalgamwithdifferentadhesives