Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance

Governing complex environmental issues involves intensive interaction between public and private actors. These governance processes are fraught with uncertainties about, for example, the current state of environmental affairs, the relevant set of decision alternatives, the reactions of other actors...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Art Dewulf, Robbert Biesbroek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2018-10-01
Series:Policy & Society
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484
_version_ 1811230422631186432
author Art Dewulf
Robbert Biesbroek
author_facet Art Dewulf
Robbert Biesbroek
author_sort Art Dewulf
collection DOAJ
description Governing complex environmental issues involves intensive interaction between public and private actors. These governance processes are fraught with uncertainties about, for example, the current state of environmental affairs, the relevant set of decision alternatives, the reactions of other actors to proposed solutions or the future developments likely to affect an issue. Uncertainty comes in different shapes and sizes and different strands in the literature, which has placed emphasis either on the substance of the issue (e.g. in environmental sciences) or on the decision-making process (e.g. policy sciences). In this paper, we bring together these different strands of literature on uncertainty to present a novel analytical framework. We build on the argument that the nature of uncertainty consists of three types: epistemic uncertainty (involving the lack of knowledge about a particular system), ontological uncertainty (irreducible unpredictability due to inherently complex system behavior) and ambiguity (conflicts between fundamentally different frames about the issue at hand). Scholars have also argued the importance of differentiating between three different objects of uncertainty: substantive uncertainty (uncertainty about the content of decisions or policy issues), strategic uncertainty (uncertainty about the actions of other actors in the strategic game of decision-making) and institutional uncertainty (uncertainty about the rules of the game in decision-making). The framework is useful for analyzing and addressing the nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making. Better understanding of the range of uncertainties is crucial to design more robust policies and governance arrangements and to deal with wicked environmental problems.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T10:29:02Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e2aaef3c7c34eb999b565f01f1f8f26
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1449-4035
1839-3373
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T10:29:02Z
publishDate 2018-10-01
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format Article
series Policy & Society
spelling doaj.art-2e2aaef3c7c34eb999b565f01f1f8f262022-12-22T03:36:53ZengOxford University PressPolicy & Society1449-40351839-33732018-10-0137444145810.1080/14494035.2018.15044841504484Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governanceArt Dewulf0Robbert Biesbroek1Wageningen University and ResearchWageningen University and ResearchGoverning complex environmental issues involves intensive interaction between public and private actors. These governance processes are fraught with uncertainties about, for example, the current state of environmental affairs, the relevant set of decision alternatives, the reactions of other actors to proposed solutions or the future developments likely to affect an issue. Uncertainty comes in different shapes and sizes and different strands in the literature, which has placed emphasis either on the substance of the issue (e.g. in environmental sciences) or on the decision-making process (e.g. policy sciences). In this paper, we bring together these different strands of literature on uncertainty to present a novel analytical framework. We build on the argument that the nature of uncertainty consists of three types: epistemic uncertainty (involving the lack of knowledge about a particular system), ontological uncertainty (irreducible unpredictability due to inherently complex system behavior) and ambiguity (conflicts between fundamentally different frames about the issue at hand). Scholars have also argued the importance of differentiating between three different objects of uncertainty: substantive uncertainty (uncertainty about the content of decisions or policy issues), strategic uncertainty (uncertainty about the actions of other actors in the strategic game of decision-making) and institutional uncertainty (uncertainty about the rules of the game in decision-making). The framework is useful for analyzing and addressing the nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making. Better understanding of the range of uncertainties is crucial to design more robust policies and governance arrangements and to deal with wicked environmental problems.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484Uncertaintyambiguitywicked problemsdecision-makingenvironmental governance
spellingShingle Art Dewulf
Robbert Biesbroek
Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
Policy & Society
Uncertainty
ambiguity
wicked problems
decision-making
environmental governance
title Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
title_full Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
title_fullStr Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
title_full_unstemmed Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
title_short Nine lives of uncertainty in decision-making: strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
title_sort nine lives of uncertainty in decision making strategies for dealing with uncertainty in environmental governance
topic Uncertainty
ambiguity
wicked problems
decision-making
environmental governance
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1504484
work_keys_str_mv AT artdewulf ninelivesofuncertaintyindecisionmakingstrategiesfordealingwithuncertaintyinenvironmentalgovernance
AT robbertbiesbroek ninelivesofuncertaintyindecisionmakingstrategiesfordealingwithuncertaintyinenvironmentalgovernance