Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers

High potency growth promoter implants (HGPs) are widely used under feedlot conditions but there are few reports under grazing conditions. The study’s goal was to assess the effect of HGPs on the average daily gain of steers fattened in pastures. A total of 57 crossbreed steers (Hereford &a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rodrigo Arias, Cristobal Santa-Cruz, Alejandro Velásquez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-08-01
Series:Animals
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/9/587
_version_ 1819054570108616704
author Rodrigo Arias
Cristobal Santa-Cruz
Alejandro Velásquez
author_facet Rodrigo Arias
Cristobal Santa-Cruz
Alejandro Velásquez
author_sort Rodrigo Arias
collection DOAJ
description High potency growth promoter implants (HGPs) are widely used under feedlot conditions but there are few reports under grazing conditions. The study&#8217;s goal was to assess the effect of HGPs on the average daily gain of steers fattened in pastures. A total of 57 crossbreed steers (Hereford &#215; Angus)&#8212;initial body weight = 356.65 kg &#177; 5.04 (SEM)&#8212;were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Control without HGP (n = 19), Synovex group (n = 17), and Revalor group (n = 21). The fattening period was 67 days using paddocks of <i>Lolium perenne</i> L. and <i>Trifolium repens</i> L. Body weight was recorded three times in the period. The data were analyzed using an analysis of covariance with a level of significance of 5%. The average daily gain (ADG) (1.55 &#177; 0.07 and 1.48 &#177; 0.09 kg/d) and the total weight gain (103.4 &#177; 4.9 and 99.2 &#177; 5.8 kg) were similar for Revalor and Synovex, respectively (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Moreover, HGP groups showed higher ADG and total weight gain (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) than the control group (ADG = 0.93 &#177; 0.08 kg/d and a total weight gain of 62.2 &#177; 5.2 kg). Final body weights were 527.8 &#177; 8.5 kg and 512.2 &#177; 9.9 kg for Revalor and Synovex, respectively; and 479.9 &#177; 10.1 kg for Control. In conclusion, grazing-finished steers showed better performance when high potency HGPs were used, improving the ADG and final live body weight, generating a marginal income that justifies the use of the technology under grazing conditions
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:53:43Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e2f0b489219447d87683cab87bb3ba0
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2076-2615
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:53:43Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Animals
spelling doaj.art-2e2f0b489219447d87683cab87bb3ba02022-12-21T19:03:25ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152019-08-019958710.3390/ani9090587ani9090587Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened SteersRodrigo Arias0Cristobal Santa-Cruz1Alejandro Velásquez2Instituto de Producción Animal, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia-Chile, Valdivia 5090000, ChilePrivate consultors, Frutillar 5620000, ChileEscuela de Agronomía, Universidad Católica de Temuco, Temuco 4780000, ChileHigh potency growth promoter implants (HGPs) are widely used under feedlot conditions but there are few reports under grazing conditions. The study&#8217;s goal was to assess the effect of HGPs on the average daily gain of steers fattened in pastures. A total of 57 crossbreed steers (Hereford &#215; Angus)&#8212;initial body weight = 356.65 kg &#177; 5.04 (SEM)&#8212;were randomly allocated to one of three groups: Control without HGP (n = 19), Synovex group (n = 17), and Revalor group (n = 21). The fattening period was 67 days using paddocks of <i>Lolium perenne</i> L. and <i>Trifolium repens</i> L. Body weight was recorded three times in the period. The data were analyzed using an analysis of covariance with a level of significance of 5%. The average daily gain (ADG) (1.55 &#177; 0.07 and 1.48 &#177; 0.09 kg/d) and the total weight gain (103.4 &#177; 4.9 and 99.2 &#177; 5.8 kg) were similar for Revalor and Synovex, respectively (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Moreover, HGP groups showed higher ADG and total weight gain (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) than the control group (ADG = 0.93 &#177; 0.08 kg/d and a total weight gain of 62.2 &#177; 5.2 kg). Final body weights were 527.8 &#177; 8.5 kg and 512.2 &#177; 9.9 kg for Revalor and Synovex, respectively; and 479.9 &#177; 10.1 kg for Control. In conclusion, grazing-finished steers showed better performance when high potency HGPs were used, improving the ADG and final live body weight, generating a marginal income that justifies the use of the technology under grazing conditionshttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/9/587beef cattlegrazinganabolic
spellingShingle Rodrigo Arias
Cristobal Santa-Cruz
Alejandro Velásquez
Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers
Animals
beef cattle
grazing
anabolic
title Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers
title_full Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers
title_fullStr Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers
title_full_unstemmed Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers
title_short Effect of High Potency Growth Implants on Average Daily Gain of Grass-Fattened Steers
title_sort effect of high potency growth implants on average daily gain of grass fattened steers
topic beef cattle
grazing
anabolic
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/9/9/587
work_keys_str_mv AT rodrigoarias effectofhighpotencygrowthimplantsonaveragedailygainofgrassfattenedsteers
AT cristobalsantacruz effectofhighpotencygrowthimplantsonaveragedailygainofgrassfattenedsteers
AT alejandrovelasquez effectofhighpotencygrowthimplantsonaveragedailygainofgrassfattenedsteers