PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDES

Three hundred laying hens of two commercial and one experimental crossbreed were evaluated in Peruvian Andes. The Commercial crossbreeds were Babcock Brown and Improved Creole ISAMISA (CM), and local experimental crossbreed (CE). The experimental crossbreed was obtained from Naked Neck Creole Hens,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Manuel Paredes, Fani Raico
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Asociación Peruana de Reproducción Animal 2021-10-01
Series:SPERMOVA
Subjects:
Online Access:http://spermova.pe/site2/files/Revistas/Rev.%2011%20Vol.1/04-_Paredes_2021.pdf
_version_ 1818821754800308224
author Manuel Paredes
Fani Raico
author_facet Manuel Paredes
Fani Raico
author_sort Manuel Paredes
collection DOAJ
description Three hundred laying hens of two commercial and one experimental crossbreed were evaluated in Peruvian Andes. The Commercial crossbreeds were Babcock Brown and Improved Creole ISAMISA (CM), and local experimental crossbreed (CE). The experimental crossbreed was obtained from Naked Neck Creole Hens, legs feather Creole Hens and Babcock Brown (BB) commercial layer. The females were reared to 52 wk. of age, and recorded data included body weight, feed intake, egg number, and egg weight, allowing the calculation of egg mass and feed conversion ratio. The economic value of each crossbreed was determined by overall egg production and body weight at 52-wk old. The highest laying rate was exhibited by Babcock (76.9%) and CE (58.9%), followed by CM (53.1%). The crossbreeds differed in feed intake and in females’ feed conversion, with BB leading (2.55) followed by CE (3.49) and CM (4.32). In egg production, BB were the best, as expected from specialized tableegg crossbreeds. In summary, BB was the best egg-producing crossbreed, but poor in meat production. Better choice for dual-purpose production would be CE, ranked second in egg production. CM was the best meat-producing crossbreed and were second in egg-mass production. Hence, CE might be the best dual-purpose hybrid with better feed efficiency than CM and the consumers prefer large eggs and birds.
first_indexed 2024-12-18T23:13:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2e39b10388a2424cbba150ef35040536
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2223-9375
2308-4928
language Spanish
last_indexed 2024-12-18T23:13:13Z
publishDate 2021-10-01
publisher Asociación Peruana de Reproducción Animal
record_format Article
series SPERMOVA
spelling doaj.art-2e39b10388a2424cbba150ef350405362022-12-21T20:48:17ZspaAsociación Peruana de Reproducción AnimalSPERMOVA2223-93752308-49282021-10-01111243110.18548/aspe/0009.04PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDESManuel Paredes0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4717-3393Fani Raico1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5770-8152Facultad de Ingeniería en Ciencias Pecuarias de la Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca, Perú.Facultad de Ingeniería en Ciencias Pecuarias de la Universidad Nacional de Cajamarca, Perú.Three hundred laying hens of two commercial and one experimental crossbreed were evaluated in Peruvian Andes. The Commercial crossbreeds were Babcock Brown and Improved Creole ISAMISA (CM), and local experimental crossbreed (CE). The experimental crossbreed was obtained from Naked Neck Creole Hens, legs feather Creole Hens and Babcock Brown (BB) commercial layer. The females were reared to 52 wk. of age, and recorded data included body weight, feed intake, egg number, and egg weight, allowing the calculation of egg mass and feed conversion ratio. The economic value of each crossbreed was determined by overall egg production and body weight at 52-wk old. The highest laying rate was exhibited by Babcock (76.9%) and CE (58.9%), followed by CM (53.1%). The crossbreeds differed in feed intake and in females’ feed conversion, with BB leading (2.55) followed by CE (3.49) and CM (4.32). In egg production, BB were the best, as expected from specialized tableegg crossbreeds. In summary, BB was the best egg-producing crossbreed, but poor in meat production. Better choice for dual-purpose production would be CE, ranked second in egg production. CM was the best meat-producing crossbreed and were second in egg-mass production. Hence, CE might be the best dual-purpose hybrid with better feed efficiency than CM and the consumers prefer large eggs and birds.http://spermova.pe/site2/files/Revistas/Rev.%2011%20Vol.1/04-_Paredes_2021.pdflaying hensdual-purpose henslocal breed hensovipositionbody weight
spellingShingle Manuel Paredes
Fani Raico
PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDES
SPERMOVA
laying hens
dual-purpose hens
local breed hens
oviposition
body weight
title PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDES
title_full PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDES
title_fullStr PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDES
title_full_unstemmed PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDES
title_short PRODUCTIVE PERFORMANCE OF GENETICALLY DIFFERENT HEN CROSSBREEDS IN PERUVIAN ANDES
title_sort productive performance of genetically different hen crossbreeds in peruvian andes
topic laying hens
dual-purpose hens
local breed hens
oviposition
body weight
url http://spermova.pe/site2/files/Revistas/Rev.%2011%20Vol.1/04-_Paredes_2021.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT manuelparedes productiveperformanceofgeneticallydifferenthencrossbreedsinperuvianandes
AT faniraico productiveperformanceofgeneticallydifferenthencrossbreedsinperuvianandes